Literature DB >> 23807774

MET overexpression assessed by new interpretation method predicts gene amplification and poor survival in advanced gastric carcinomas.

Sang Y Ha1, Jeeyun Lee, So Y Kang, In-Gu Do, Soomin Ahn, Joon O Park, Won K Kang, Min-Gew Choi, Tae S Sohn, Jae M Bae, Sung Kim, Minji Kim, Seonwoo Kim, Cheol K Park, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Kyoung-Mee Kim.   

Abstract

The establishment of better selection criteria for identifying sub-populations that may benefit from treatment is a key aspect of the development and success of targeted therapy. To investigate methods for assessing MET overexpression in gastric cancer, we conducted immunohistochemistry using a new anti-Total MET monoclonal antibody in a single-institution cohort of 495 patients. As antibody is directed against a membranous and/or cytoplasmic epitope, two interpretation methods were used: (1) membranous and cytoplasmic and (2) membranous alone. In selected 120 cases, copy number gain and mRNA expression levels were measured using quantitative real-time PCR. Further in situ hybridization confirmed the presence of MET gene amplification. Among the 495 gastric cancers, simultaneous membranous and cytoplasmic overexpression of MET was found in 108 cases (21.8%) and membranous alone overexpression was observed in 40 cases (8.1%). The highest correlation was observed in membranous and cytoplasmic staining of MET: MET expression scores correlated significantly with high MET mRNA levels (r=0.465, P<0.0001), increased copy number gain (r=0.393, P=0.000002) and amplification of MET gene. Moreover, patients with MET overexpression showed shorter overall survival (HR, 1.781; 95% CI, 1.324-2.395; P<0.001) and disease-free survival (HR, 1.765; 95% CI, 1.227-2.541; P=0.002) compared with patients without MET overexpression. However, membranous overexpression of MET did not highly correlate with mRNA level (r=0.274, P=0.002), copy number gain or survival (P>0.05). We developed highly correlating interpretation methods of MET immunohistochemistry in gastric carcinomas. MET overexpression is an independent prognostic factor and could be a potential target and predictor of benefit for targeted therapy with MET inhibitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807774     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  57 in total

1.  PET of c-Met in Cancer with ⁶⁴Cu-Labeled Hepatocyte Growth Factor.

Authors:  Haiming Luo; Hao Hong; Michael R Slater; Stephen A Graves; Sixiang Shi; Yunan Yang; Robert J Nickles; Frank Fan; Weibo Cai
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  HDAC6 regulates microRNA-27b that suppresses proliferation, promotes apoptosis and target MET in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Y J Jia; Z B Liu; W G Wang; C B Sun; P Wei; Y L Yang; M J You; B H Yu; X Q Li; X Y Zhou
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Prognostic and predictive value of MET deregulation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giovanna Finocchiaro; Luca Toschi; Letizia Gianoncelli; Marina Baretti; Armando Santoro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-04

4.  A Randomized Phase II Study of FOLFOX With or Without the MET Inhibitor Onartuzumab in Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction.

Authors:  Manish A Shah; Jae-Yong Cho; Iain B Tan; Niall C Tebbutt; Chia-Jui Yen; Alice Kang; David S Shames; Lilian Bu; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 5.  Novel targets in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a perspective review.

Authors:  Elisa Fontana; Elizabeth C Smyth
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  Prognostic impact of HER2, EGFR, and c-MET status on overall survival of advanced gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Nozomu Fuse; Yasutoshi Kuboki; Takeshi Kuwata; Tomohiro Nishina; Shigenori Kadowaki; Eiji Shinozaki; Nozomu Machida; Satoshi Yuki; Akira Ooki; Shinya Kajiura; Tetsuo Kimura; Takeharu Yamanaka; Kohei Shitara; Akiko Kawano Nagatsuma; Takayuki Yoshino; Atsushi Ochiai; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Clinical and prognostic value of MET gene copy number gain and chromosome 7 polysomy in primary colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  An Na Seo; Kyoung Un Park; Gheeyoung Choe; Woo Ho Kim; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 8.  Exploring the role of molecular biomarkers as a potential weapon against gastric cancer: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Marwa Matboli; Sarah El-Nakeep; Nourhan Hossam; Alaa Habieb; Ahmed E M Azazy; Ali E Ebrahim; Ziad Nagy; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  The Therapeutic Potential of Targeting the HGF/cMET Axis in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Kim Moran-Jones
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Rosa Berenato; Luca Turati; Alessia Mennitto; Francesca Steccanella; Marta Caporale; Pierpaolo Dallera; Filippo de Braud; Ezio Pezzica; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Giovanni Sgroi; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Filippo Pietrantonio; Sandro Barni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.