Sarcopenia and change in body composition following maximal androgen suppression with abiraterone in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard medical castration reduces muscle mass. We sought to characterize body composition changes in men undergoing maximal androgen suppression with and without exogenous gluocorticoids.
METHODS: Cross-sectional areas of total fat, visceral fat and muscle were measured on serial CT scans in a post-hoc analysis of patients treated in Phase I/II trials with abiraterone followed by abiraterone and dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily. Linear mixed regression models were used to account for variations in time-on-treatment and baseline body mass index (BMI).
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients received a median of 7.5 months abiraterone followed by 5.4 months abiraterone and dexamethasone. Muscle loss was observed on single-agent abiraterone (maximal in patients with baseline BMI >30, -4.3%), but no further loss was observed after addition of dexamethasone. Loss of visceral fat was also observed on single-agent abiraterone, (baseline BMI >30 patients -19.6%). In contrast, addition of dexamethasone led to an increase in central visceral and total fat and BMI in all the patients.
INTERPRETATION: Maximal androgen suppression was associated with loss of muscle and visceral fat. Addition of low dose dexamethasone resulted in significant increases in visceral and total fat. These changes could have important quality-of-life implications for men treated with abiraterone.

Androgens, together with growth hormone mimetics and follistatin, activate anabolic pathways in a process that results in the accrual of muscle mass (Basaria and Bhasin, 2012). Androgens are therefore an important determinant of body composition in men. In fact, serum testosterone concentrations correlate positively with muscle and negatively with fat mass (Vermeulen ). A change in body composition, with loss of muscle mass and increased subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat, is widely recognised as an adverse effect of castration for men with prostate cancer (Lee ; Hamilton ; Smith ). Skeletal muscle depletion is associated with reduced functional ability and increased mortality (Fearon ) and may also contribute to the increased cardio-metabolic risk associated with androgen-deprivation therapy (Basaria and Bhasin, 2012). Testosterone levels decline from >50 ng dl−1 to a median of 7 ng dl−1 following castration for prostate cancer (Attard ; Ryan ). Treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with abiraterone, a selective inhibitor of CYP17A1, results in a further decline in serum testosterone to <0.9 ng dl−1 (Attard ). A decline in cortisol associated with a compensatory rise in adrenocorticotrophic hormone and a consequent syndrome of secondary mineralocorticoid excess in most patients treated with abiraterone alone has led to its development in combination with exogenous glucocorticoids, most commonly prednisone 5 mg bid.

Abiraterone improves the survival of men with docetaxel-treated and chemotherapy-naive CRPC (de Bono ; Ryan ). As abiraterone is better tolerated than chemotherapy, it is anticipated that it will be increasingly widely used before chemotherapy. A change in body composition with abiraterone could have important implications for the quality of life of men with advanced prostate cancer, especially men who are asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. If recognized, body composition changes can be addressed through exercise interventions (Segal ; Galvao ). We hypothesized that both abiraterone and exogenous glucocorticoids could affect body composition, and we therefore separately evaluated the effects of abiraterone alone (resulting in ‘super-castrate' levels of serum androgens) and after addition of exogenous glucocorticoids to abiraterone in men with progressive CRPC.

Materials and Methods

Patients

All patients treated with single-agent abiraterone in clinical trials at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK (COU-AA-001 (Attard ), COU-AA-003 (Reid ) and COU-Bioequivalence (Carden )) were considered for this post-hoc analysis. Entry to these trials required histological evidence of prostate adenocarcinoma with progressing disease by Prostate Working Group criteria (Bubley ), adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function and good performance status; without brain metastases, spinal cord compression, uncontrolled hypertension or serious concurrent medical illness. All patients maintained a castrate state throughout study participation by means of ongoing LHRH analogue therapy or surgical castration. These trials allowed addition of dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily at PSA progression on abiraterone alone or for management of abiraterone-related toxicity. Dexamethasone was utilized in preference to prednisone due to higher activity reported in CRPC (Venkitaraman ), less mineralocorticoid activity (Lan ) and to evaluate re-induction of sensitivity to abiraterone in patients who had been previously treated with the same dose and regimen of glucocorticoid (Attard ). Patients were not provided specific instructions about nutrition or exercise. Study protocols were approved by the Royal Marsden institutional research board (IRB), and all patients provided informed consent for imaging and data collection.

Study design

The primary outcome of this analysis was change of muscle, subcutaneous fat, visceral fat and total fat area and of body mass index (BMI) after a minimum of 6 weeks treatment with single-agent abiraterone and a minimum of 6 weeks treatment with abiraterone combined with dexamethasone. Previous studies have shown linear relationships between lumbar skeletal muscle and fat cross-sectional areas measured using multiple-slice computed tomography (CT) and whole-body muscle and fat mass measured using dedicated dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans (Shen ; Mourtzakis ). We thus were able to use CT scans performed for clinical or restaging purposes for analyses of changes in body composition. For this analysis, patients were required to have three available CT scans: a pretreatment CT for baseline assessment, a CT following a minimum of 6 weeks treatment on abiraterone alone (before initiation of dexamethasone; treatment period 1, see Supplementary Table S1) and a CT after a similar duration of treatment with combination abiraterone and dexamethasone (treatment period 2). Cross-sectional areas of muscle were averaged from two consecutive CT slices at the L3 level as has been described previously (Prado ; Antoun ) using OsiriX version 4.0 (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) and Slice-O-Matic version 4.3 (TomoVision, Magog, QC, Canada) software. Total fat and visceral fat were measured at the L4 level using the same technique. Subcutaneous fat was manually calculated from the difference between total and visceral fat. Measurements were undertaken by three trained assessors (CP, DM, GS) and were independently reviewed by a radiologist (NT). Anthropomorphic measurements of height at baseline and weight at each assessment point were used to calculate BMI (expressed as kg m−2).

Statistical analysis

Changes in body composition were assessed by baseline BMI status (<25, 25–30, >30) as the relative change in body composition on treatment was expected to vary between these baseline groups. Unlike the fixed treatment intervals used in adjuvant hormone schedules, CRPC patients receive abiraterone for highly variable periods of time. The inter-scan intervals (from start to completion of treatment, see Supplementary Table S1) therefore differ between patients, and observed changes in body composition could be similarly expected to depend on the length of treatment patients received. Thus a model-based approach was used, with selection of linear mixed regression models to account for the natural correlation among repeated measures (Verbeke and Molenberghs, 2000). The individual patient data were incorporated in this model to account for variability in scan intervals, and all results represent estimated change after 6 months on the reported treatment combination. Predictor variables were abiraterone and dexamethasone treatment, time on abiraterone, time on dexamethasone and interactions between these variables and the baseline BMI group. These interactions allowed for potentially different slopes and effects in the different BMI groups. Models were built separately for muscle, total fat, visceral fat and subcutaneous fat areas and BMI, all of which were log transformed for analysis. The mean (and 95% confidence interval (CI)) effect estimates were derived from linear combinations of coefficients from these models at fixed time points, which were selected to represent the average length of time spent on the different treatment combinations. Two-sided P values are reported, and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Interaction P values were provided to demonstrate whether the changes observed were different between the baseline BMI groups. Due to the predefined study endpoints, no adjustment for multiplicity was considered necessary (Rothman, 1990). Analyses were performed using Stata version 12 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) by an experienced biostatistician (AMC). Pearson correlation analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.0a (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 96 patients treated with abiraterone in early clinical trials that evaluated abiraterone alone followed by abiraterone and dexamethasone at the Royal Marsden Hospital, only 55 patients were eligible for body composition analyses (Figure 1, patient characteristics described in Table 1 and Supplementary Table S2). All subsequent studies have utilised combinations of abiraterone and exogenous glucocorticoids, and this therefore represents a unique population for evaluating the effect of ‘super-castration' without the confounding factors introduced by concomitant exogenous glucocorticoids. The majority of patients were of European descent (53 Caucasian, 1 Black African, 1 Black Caribbean) and 46 patients were docetaxel-naive. Before starting treatment, 10 (18%) patients had a BMI <25, 26 (47%) had a BMI 25–30 and 19 (35%) had a BMI >30. Patients received a median of 7.5 months abiraterone alone and 5.4 months abiraterone and dexamethasone. At the CT scan evaluating change on abiraterone alone, 46 patients had a confirmed rise in PSA as defined by PSAWG I (Bubley ), 3 (of 46) had soft-tissue progression on CT scan and three patients had progression on bone scan. Of the nine patients without PSA progression, five had toxicity and four required addition of dexamethasone following a protocol amendment (Supplementary Table S1). At the scan evaluating change on abiraterone and dexamethasone, 33 patients had a confirmed rise in PSA (7 (of 33) had soft-tissue progression on CT scan and 9 had progression on bone scan), and 22 patients had an ongoing response or stable disease and continued on study treatment.

Figure 1

Selection of patients for body composition analyses.

Table 1

Demographics of patients included in body composition analysis (n=55)

Population, n=55	Median (range)	N (%)
Ethnicity
Caucasian		53 (96)
Black African		1 (2)
Black Caribbean		1 (2)
Gleason at diagnosis	8 (4–10) (NA in 3 patients)
Time from castration to abiraterone, years	3.7 (0.4–13.7)
Baseline PSA	79 (8.8–10 335)
Baseline BMI
<25		10 (18)
25–30		26 (47)
>30		19 (35)
Previous glucocorticoid treatment for prostate cancer		28 (51)
Duration of steroids in pre-chemotherapy patients, months (n=17)	11.2 (1.0–38.0)
Steroid-free interval in pre-chemotherapy patients, months (n=17)	5.2 (1.2–12.7)
Previous docetaxel treatment		11 (20)
Age at starting abiraterone, years	68 (49–86)
Metastases at baseline
Bone		49 (89)
L/N		30 (55)
Visceral		5 (9)
ECOG performance status
0		37 (67)
1		18 (33)
Overall survival, months	43.7 (range 8.5–75.7a)

Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; L/N=lymph node; NA=not assessable; PSA=prostate-specific antigen.

Survival data censored as of 4 December 2012.

Assessment of muscle mass and body fat using CT scans

Two software packages for evaluating body composition (OsiriX and Slice-O-Matic; Figure 2, Supplementary Figure S1) were first used to evaluate pretreatment scans by operators blinded to each other's results. There was strong correlation between area measurements with the two software techniques, with r-values of 0.96 for total fat, 0.94 for visceral fat and 0.80 for muscle. Both software platforms were equally user friendly, and OsiriX was selected due to individual operator choice. Baseline BMI was compared with measurements of cross-sectional areas of fat and muscle. Total fat (r=0.85) and subcutaneous fat (r=0.83) strongly correlated with BMI and visceral fat and muscle were less strongly correlated (r=0.59 and 0.65, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S2).

Figure 2

Analysis of body composition using OsiriX software: (A) total (visceral and subcutaneous) and visceral fat analysis at baseline, (B) after abiraterone and (A) (C) after abiraterone plus dexamethasone; (A+D) muscle analysis, including psoas, paravertebral and abdominal muscles at (D) baseline, (E) after abiraterone and (F) after abiraterone plus dexamethasone.

Changes in muscle and fat on treatment with abiraterone followed by abiraterone and dexamethasone

Muscle loss was observed in patients treated with single-agent abiraterone, with loss greatest in patients with a baseline BMI >30 (median change: BMI <25: −2.9% (95% CI: −6.5, +0.8); BMI 25–30, −2.8% (95% CI: −5.1, −0.5); BMI >30, −4.3% (95% CI: −7.1, −1.5); Table 2, Figure 3A). There was no further significant change in muscle mass after the addition of dexamethasone. Surprisingly, loss of visceral fat was also observed on single-agent abiraterone. Similarly, this effect was most evident in patients with a baseline BMI >30 who had a 19.6% (95% CI: −26.9, −11.6%) loss of visceral fat area (median change: BMI <25: −10.6% (95% CI: −20.9, 1%); BMI: 25–30: −9.9% (95% CI: −16.6, −2.7%); Table 2, Figures 3B and C). Loss of subcutaneous fat was less marked (Table 2, Supplementary Figure S3). In keeping with loss of fat and muscle with single-agent abiraterone, there was also a decrease in BMI, again most significant in patients with a baseline BMI >30 (−8.1% (95% CI: −10.8, −5.4); Table 2, Figure 3D).

Table 2

Changes in fat and muscle following treatment with abiraterone (abi) and after addition of dexamethasone (dexa) to abiraterone

		Change on abi from baseline		Change on abi+dexa from abi alone			Change on abi+dexa from baseline
	Relative change at 6 months (95% CI)	P-value	Int. p	Relative change at 12 months (95% CI)	P-value	Int. p	Relative change at 12 months (95% CI)	P-value	Int. p
Muscle
BMI<25	0.971 (0.935, 1.008)	0.1278	0.6840	1.016 (0.978, 1.055)	0.4132	0.5047	0.987 (0.949, 1.026)	0.4969	0.5875
BMI 25–30	0.972 (0.949, 0.995)	0.0191		1.005 (0.982, 1.029)	0.6584		0.977 (0.953, 1.001)	0.0653
BMI>30	0.957 (0.929, 0.985)	0.0029		0.990 (0.963, 1.017)	0.4578		0.947 (0.917, 0.977)	0.0007
Total fat
BMI<25	0.935 (0.852, 1.026)	0.1549	0.0573	1.186 (1.081, 1.302)	0.0003	0.2447	1.109 (1.008, 1.220)	0.0341	0.1068
BMI 25–30	0.941 (0.888, 0.998)	0.0426		1.125 (1.062, 1.191)	0.0001		1.059 (0.997, 1.125)	0.0647
BMI>30	0.845 (0.786, 0.908)	<0.0001		1.211 (1.131, 1.296)	<0.0001		1.023 (0.946, 1.106)	0.5725
Visceral fat
BMI<25	0.894 (0.791, 1.010)	0.0725	0.1640	1.236 (1.093, 1.398)	0.0007	0.3832	1.105 (0.973, 1.253)	0.1230	0.3160
BMI 25–30	0.901 (0.834, 0.973)	0.0082		1.178 (1.092, 1.271)	<0.0001		1.062 (0.980, 1.150)	0.1431
BMI>30	0.804 (0.731, 0.884)	<0.0001		1.279 (1.169, 1.399)	<0.0001		1.028 (0.928, 1.140)	0.5931
Subcutaneous fat
BMI<25	0.980 (0.864, 1.111)	0.7510	0.2540	1.130 (0.996, 1.282)	0.0581	0.2180	1.107 (0.972, 1.261)	0.1242	0.1562
BMI 25–30	0.975 (0.901, 1.056)	0.5379		1.049 (0.970, 1.134)	0.2326		1.023 (0.942, 1.110)	0.5884
BMI>30	0.884 (0.802, 0.974)	0.0131		1.164 (1.061, 1.277)	0.0013		1.029 (0.925, 1.143)	0.6005
BMI
<25	0.979 (0.943, 1.017)	0.2789	0.0043	1.060 (1.020, 1.102)	0.0027	0.5419	1.038 (0.998, 1.080)	0.0619	0.0535
25–30	0.975 (0.952, 0.998)	0.0362		1.058 (1.033, 1.083)	<0.0001		1.031 (1.006, 1.057)	0.0154
>30	0.919 (0.892, 0.946)	<0.0001		1.038 (1.010, 1.068)	0.0084		0.954 (0.924, 0.985)	0.0040

Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; CI=confidence interval; int. p=interaction P value.

Changes that are statistically significant shown in bold.

Figure 3

Percentage change in ( Modeled individual patient data are presented on the left, and median trend divided by BMI on the right. Solid blue arrows indicate the phase of treatment.

In contrast, the addition of dexamethasone led to a striking increase in central fat in all the patients regardless of baseline BMI and most notably visceral (BMI<25: +23.6% (95% CI: +9.3, +39.8%), BMI 25–30: +17.8% (95% CI: +9.2, +27.1%), BMI>30: +27.9% (95% CI: +16.9, +39.9%)), with a recovery in fat to pre-abiraterone levels (Table 2, Figures 3B and C). The change in subcutaneous fat was again less marked (Table 2, Supplementary Figure S3). Overall, there was a significant increase in total fat (+10.9% (95% CI: +0.8, +22%)) by completion of both treatment periods in patients with a baseline BMI <25 (Table 2). After the addition of dexamethasone, all groups experienced a marked increase in BMI (<25: 6.0% (2.0, 10.2); 25–30: 5.8% (3.3, 8.3); >30: 3.8% (1.0, 6.8)). However, over both treatment periods there was a median increase in BMI of +3.8% for patients with a baseline BMI <25 (95% CI: −0.2, 8.0) and 3.1% in patients with a baseline BMI 25–30 (95% CI: 0.6, 5.7; Table 2, Figure 3E). In contrast, there was a 4.6% decrease (95% CI: −7.6, −1.5) in BMI in patients with a baseline BMI >30.

Loss of fat and muscle shows stabilization on castration before abiraterone treatment

In view of the finding of muscle and fat loss with abiraterone, we sought to exclude whether this was ongoing secondary to castration or induced by initiation of abiraterone. We identified a subset of seven men with CT scans performed a minimum of 6 months before commencing abiraterone and who had muscle loss (range: 2.1–17.1% reduction in area) on single-agent abiraterone. Pretreatment CT scans were performed a median of 9.7 months earlier (range: 6.5–15.1 months). No patient had muscle loss in this interval (Figure 4), and there was no consistent effect on visceral or subcutaneous fat measurements. Moreover, in the entire cohort there was no correlation between loss of muscle or fat on abiraterone and time from commencing castration (Supplementary Figure S4).

Figure 4

Changes in muscle before and after starting abiraterone (

Discussion

This is the first study to report muscle loss in castrate men caused by increasing suppression of serum androgens to a ‘super-castrate' range by abiraterone. This is notable because a significant proportion of patients remain on abiraterone for many months and the prevalence and risks of sarcopenia are likely to be underestimated, despite the potential impact on patients' quality of life. Side-effects associated with androgen suppression, including hot flushes and testicular atrophy, have been reported previously (Attard ; Ryan ), but changes in body composition have, to date, not been studied. Patients with a pretreatment BMI >30 experienced the most significant loss of muscle mass. The finding that single-agent abiraterone resulted in loss of visceral fat in addition to muscle, with a corresponding decrease in BMI, was unexpected. Small cohort studies utilizing CT scans have previously reported conflicting effects on visceral fat with androgen deprivation. A study in 32 men commencing first-line androgen deprivation suggested no change after 48 weeks on treatment (Smith ), whereas a 22% increase in visceral abdominal fat was reported in 26 men over the first 12 months of androgen deprivation (Hamilton ). Most studies of sarcopenia in prostate cancer utilize DEXA scans and therefore cannot identify changes in visceral fat.

No additional loss of muscle was observed on addition of dexamethasone to abiraterone. Although this is likely to be a result of a plateau in muscle loss as has also been observed in men treated with initial androgen-deprivation therapy (Lee ; Smith ), we cannot exclude the possibility that glucocorticoids initiated with abiraterone would protect against muscle loss. This could be a consideration for trials utilizing lower dose of exogenous glucocortiocoids. Sarcopenia could occur secondary to disease progression, but the absence of significant changes in progressing patients before initiation of abiraterone (Figure 4), the plateau in muscle loss maintained after addition of dexamethasone and the fact that the majority of patients had a rising PSA in the absence of radiological progression at evaluation for changes on single-agent abiraterone (Supplementary Table S1) suggest that disease progression cannot explain our findings. Also, there was no significant gastro-intestinal toxicity with abiraterone that could explain the loss of muscle and fat observed. Conversely and as anticipated, there was gain of central fat, most notably visceral, and BMI on addition of exogenous glucocorticoid (0.5 mg dexamethasone, equivalent to 5–7.5 mg prednisone). In this study, we only observed a significant gain in fat after completion of both study periods compared with pre-abiraterone in patients with a BMI <25. In current routine clinical practice, glucocorticoids are initiated with abiraterone, and this could change the extent of fat gain.

These data were obtained in an unplanned post-hoc analysis and must be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The sample size limited the statistical power for subgroup analyses. The variability in treatment duration and imaging was accounted for in the statistical model. However, an important potential confounder was the previous exposure to glucocorticoid treatment in half of the subjects. The impact of such treatment would only be explored through further analysis of larger patient groups. Abiraterone has now been extensively evaluated in Phase I, II and III clinical trials, and there are no reports of an association with an increase in cardio-metabolic events. However, overall these data introduce important considerations on the long-term implications of profound androgen suppression. Importantly, they should instigate further in-depth evaluation of changes in body composition in a larger cohort of patients using restaging CT scans obtained in the post- and pre-chemotherapy abiraterone Phase III studies (COU-301, COU-302), ongoing clinical studies of other C17,20-lyase inhibitors and prospective Phase IV studies. The incidence of sarcopenia secondary to other novel hormonal manipulations, including for example enzalutamide recently shown to improve overall survival of CRPC patients (Scher ), should also be evaluated.