| Literature DB >> 23807163 |
S Bellone1, R Tassi, M Betti, D English, E Cocco, S Gasparrini, I Bortolomai, J D Black, P Todeschini, C Romani, A Ravaggi, E Bignotti, E Bandiera, L Zanotti, S Pecorelli, L Ardighieri, M Falchetti, C Donzelli, E R Siegel, M Azodi, D-A Silasi, E Ratner, P E Schwartz, T J Rutherford, A D Santin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We studied the genetic fingerprints of ovarian cancer and validated the potential of Mammaglobin b (SCGB2A1), one of the top differentially expressed genes found in our analysis, as a novel ovarian tumour rejection antigen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23807163 PMCID: PMC3721400 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients
| | | | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Normal ovary | 14 | 37–61 | 53 | 6 | — | NA | — | | — | NA | — |
| Primary EOC | Serous | 24 | 41–84 | 60 | 12 | — | 2 | 22 | — | 3 | 12 | 9 |
| | Endometrioid | 24 | 39–71 | 56 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 2 |
| | Clear cell | 15 | 34–74 | 60 | 12 | — | — | 15 | 6 | 5 | 4 | — |
| Undifferentiated | 7 | 38–84 | 55 | 16 | — | — | 7 | — | 1 | 4 | 2 | |
Abbreviations: EOC=epithelial ovarian carcinoma; NA=not available; Y=years.
Fifteen most frequently upregulated genes in OSPC vs HOSE
| 216834_at | 976.89 | ||
| 205979_at | 788.77 | ||
| 1558034_s_at | 282.25 | ||
| 225645_at | 244.63 | ||
| 225846_at | 226.47 | ||
| 203953_s_at | 213.31 | ||
| 221884_at | 213.07 | ||
| 219768_at | 194.11 | ||
| 231192_at | 193.62 | ||
| 204846_at | 192.74 | ||
| 214677_x_at | 191.07 | ||
| 213993_at | 163.23 | ||
| 228377_at | 131.84 | ||
| 211430_s_at | 131.10 | ||
| 227253_at | 128.69 | Ceruloplasmin (ferroxidase) |
Abbreviations: HOSE=human ovarian surface epithelial control cell line; OSPC=ovarian serous papillary carcinoma.
Fifteen most frequently upregulated genes in endometrioid EOC vs HOSE
| 205979_at | 1843.78 | ||
| 216834_at | 418.89 | ||
| 225645_at | 336.68 | ||
| 203953_s_at | 186.30 | ||
| 225846_at | 183.31 | ||
| 221884_at | 165.92 | ||
| 206799_at | 156.66 | ||
| 227235_at | 139.50 | ||
| 219768_at | 135.86 | ||
| 1558034_s_at | 126.31 | ||
| 209173_at | 123.32 | ||
| 232361_s_at | 123.23 | ||
| 231007_at | 122.48 | ||
| 226147_s_at | 118.02 | ||
| 240304_s_at | 114.63 |
Abbreviations: EOC=epithelial ovarian carcinoma; HOSE=human ovarian surface epithelial control cell line.
Fifteen most frequently upregulated genes in clear-cell EOC vs HOSE
| 205979_at | 773.01 | ||
| 216834_at | 294.06 | ||
| 221884_at | 291.28 | ||
| 231007_at | 256.42 | ||
| 218960_at | 227.29 | ||
| 219768_at | 225.97 | ||
| 1558034_s_at | 189.84 | ||
| 228692_at | 162.60 | ||
| 204846_at | 162.27 | ||
| 209173_at | 159.77 | ||
| 210397_at | 149.24 | ||
| 225846_at | 140.15 | ||
| 202992_at | 137.24 | ||
| 203953_s_at | 136.34 | ||
| 219607_s_at | 133.21 |
Abbreviations: EOC=epithelial ovarian carcinoma; HOSE=human ovarian surface epithelial control cell line.
Fifteen most frequently upregulated genes in undifferentiated EOC vs HOSE
| 216834_at | 462.81 | ||
| 214677_x_at | 225.64 | ||
| 205979_at | 218.68 | ||
| 231192_at | 215.95 | ||
| 225645_at | 208.35 | ||
| 225846_at | 182.76 | ||
| 213993_at | 182.33 | ||
| 213975_s_at | 159.39 | ||
| 1558034_s_at | 139.02 | ||
| 211430_s_at | 135.28 | ||
| 221884_at | 124.92 | ||
| 219768_at | 103.35 | ||
| 213994_s_at | 102.09 | ||
| 204846_at | 98.24 | ||
| 201839_s_at | 97.61 |
Abbreviations: EOC=epithelial ovarian carcinoma; HOSE=human ovarian surface epithelial control cell line.
Figure 1Quantitative RT–PCR analysis of The box plots of the relative quantification (RQ) expression values for each histological type of ovarian cancer when compared with HOSE in log scale. CC, clear-cell ovarian carcinoma; EAC, endometrioid ovarian carcinoma; HOSE, normal human ovarian surface epithelial control cell lines; OSPC, ovarian serous papillary carcinoma; UOC, poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma. The qRT–PCR data were highly correlated to the microarray data (P<0.01).
Figure 2Representative patterns of SCGB2A1 immunoreactivity in the different histological types of ovarian cancer tested. (A) High-grade serous carcinoma, (B) endometrioid carcinoma, (C) clear-cell carcinoma and (D) undifferentiated carcinoma. Original magnification × 400.
Figure 3Tumour-specific CD8+ CTL responses induced by SCGB2A1-pulsed DCs against autologous chemotherapy-naive (upper panel) and metastatic/chemotherapy-resistant (middle and lower panels) primary cell lines, measured in a 5 h Percentage lysis (+s.d.) at a 5 : 1 and 10 : 1 effector/target cell ratios are shown. Anti-HLA class I blocking antibody (W6/32) was used at 50 μg ml−1. Ctr, control.
Figure 4Representative dot plot analysis of intracellular IFN- T cells were tested at ∼6 weeks after priming, after resting for 14 days after the last antigen stimulation before activation by PMA and ionomycin as described in the Materials and Methods. Numbers in the quadrants represent the percentage of CD8+ cytokine-positive T lymphocytes. FL1-H channel: IFN-γ; FL2-H channel: IL-4.