| Literature DB >> 23807117 |
Brenton Prosser1, Shannon Clark, Rachel Davey, Rhian Parker.
Abstract
A frustration often expressed by researchers and policy-makers in public health is an apparent mismatch between respective priorities and expectations for research. Academics bemoan an oversimplification of their work, a reticence for independent critique and the constant pressure to pursue evaluation funding. Meanwhile, policy-makers look for research reports written in plain language with clear application, which are attuned to current policy settings and produced quickly. In a context where there are calls in western nations for evidence based policy with stronger links to academic research, such a mismatch can present significant challenges to policy program evaluation. The purpose of this paper is to present one attempt to overcome these challenges. Specifically, the paper describes the development of a conceptual framework for a large-scale, multifaceted evaluation of an Australian Government health initiative to expand Nurse Practitioner models of practice in aged care service delivery. In doing so, the paper provides a brief review of key points for the facilitation of a strong research-policy nexus in public health evaluations, as well as describes how this particular evaluation embodies these key points. As such, the paper presents an evaluation approach which may be adopted and adapted by others undertaking public health policy program evaluations.Keywords: Nurse Practitioner; Policy evaluation; Public health; Research-policy nexus
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23807117 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eval Program Plann ISSN: 0149-7189