Counseling of female veterans about risks of medication-induced birth defects.

BACKGROUND: Medications that may increase risk of birth defects if used during pregnancy or immediately preconception are dispensed to approximately half of female Veterans who fill prescriptions at a VA pharmacy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess receipt of counseling about risk of medication-induced birth defects among female Veterans of reproductive age and to examine Veterans' confidence that their healthcare provider would counsel them about teratogenic risks. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis of data provided by 286 female Veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom and/or Operation Enduring Freedom who completed a mailed survey between July 2008 and October 2010. MAIN MEASURES: We examined associations between demographic, reproductive, and health service utilization variables and female Veterans' receipt of counseling and confidence that they would receive such counseling. KEY
RESULTS: The response rate was 11 %; the large majority (89 %) of responding female Veterans reported use of a prescription medication in the last 12 months. Most (90 %) of the 286 female Veterans who reported medication use were confident that they would be told by their healthcare provider if a medication might cause a birth defect. However, only 24 % of women who received prescription medications reported they had been warned of teratogenic risks. Female Veterans who used medications that are known to be teratogenic were not more likely than women using other medications to report having been warned about risks of medication-induced birth defects, and fewer were confident that their health care providers would provide teratogenic risk counseling when needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Female Veterans may not receive appropriate counseling when medications that can cause birth defects are prescribed.

Birth defects are a leading cause of infant mortality.1 Each year, an estimated 120,000 US infants suffer from birth defects2 and require billions of dollars in health care.3 Although the causes of most birth defects are unknown, some medications have been identified as increasing risk of birth defects. In the United States, women of reproductive age receive an estimated 12 million prescriptions for potentially teratogenic medications each year.4

While the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has historically served a predominantly male population, the number of female Veterans enrolled in the VA health care system has been growing rapidly. Between 1999 and 2006, the number of women served by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) more than doubled. Currently, there are approximately 337,000 female Veterans using VHA care on an annual basis, and the number of women in the military continues to increase. As two thirds of female Veterans returning from Operation Enduring Freedom(OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) were under 30 years of age, the VA Healthcare system is caring for a growing number of women of childbearing age.5

Given the higher burden of comorbid conditions in female Veterans compared to women seen in other settings,6 female Veterans are more likely to be dispensed potentially teratogenic medications. It is estimated that half of fertile female Veterans who receive prescriptions from a VA pharmacy fill a prescription for a potentially teratogenic medication each year.7 For example, each year, VA pharmacies dispense potentially teratogenic psychiatric medications to over 20,000 female Veterans of reproductive age, a statin is dispensed to close to 9,000 female Veterans, and an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or “angiotensin receptor blockers” (ARB) is dispensed to over 6,000 female Veterans.7

Nationally, it is estimated that fewer than 50 % of women using potentially teratogenic medications receive contraceptive counseling during ambulatory care visits.4,6 As a result, approximately 6 % of US pregnancies are exposed to potentially teratogenic medications.8,9 As little is known about how VA clinicians counsel their patients about the risks of medication-induced birth defects, the goal of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of receipt of counseling about teratogenic risks among female Veterans, and to assess female Veterans’ confidence that their healthcare providers would tell them if a medication they were taking might cause a birth defect.

METHODS

The data used for this study was collected as part of a larger research study, the Women Veterans Cohort Study (WVCS).10 WVCS is a two-phase longitudinal study examining healthcare utilization, health outcomes, and costs of care among a cohort of OEF/OIF male and female veterans in VA care. The sampling frame for the overall study is the OEF/OIF roster, provided to the VA by the Department of Defense Manpower Data Center’s (DMDC) Contingency Tracking System. The OEF/OIF roster is a database of veterans who separated from OEF/OIF military service and enrolled in VA healthcare between October 1, 2001 and April 30, 2010 (N = 749,036 of whom 88,166 are women). Roster information includes veterans’ sex, race, date of birth, deployment dates, armed forces branch (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, or Coast Guard) and component (National Guard, Reserve or active duty).

This paper utilizes data from the second phase (prospective survey component) of WVCS. OEF/OIF veterans who were enrolled for care in the New England Region or Indiana were invited to participate in this prospective study. These regions were selected as a matter of convenience, as funding constraints precluded the study of more regions. Thus, letters were sent to 3,251 female OEF/OIF veterans. Veterans expressing interest in the study, that is those who “opted in,” either met with or called the research coordinator, who provided a detailed description of the study, which would involve completion of three surveys over the course of 2 years, and screened for eligibility criteria including the ability to speak and read English, and participation in OEF or OIF. Those who agreed to participate were given an appointment at which they provided signed informed consent and completed the baseline survey, which was the source of data for these analyses. This survey was developed and pilot-tested by the WVCS investigators. Between July 2008 and October 2011, baseline surveys were completed by 11 % of female Veterans who were invited to participate (n = 365). For the purposes of this analysis, we excluded Veterans over 50 years of age (n = 27) and those using post-menopausal hormone therapy (n = 16), producing a sample of 322 female premenopausal Veterans. For analyses regarding receipt of counseling about risks of medication-induced birth defects, we further excluded 36 women who had not used prescription medication in the last 12 months.

All medication data was self-reported; no data was drawn from VA medical or pharmacy records. Specifically, female Veterans were asked “Have you taken any prescription medications in the past 12 months? (yes/no),” and then were asked about use of multiple different classes of medications. Veterans were asked about use of a number of potentially teratogenic medications, which included those most commonly used: benzodiazepines, statins, and antihypertensive medications. For example, Veterans were asked whether they had taken a “Benzodiazepine such as Diazepam (Valium), Lorazepam (Ativan), Clonazepam (Klonopin), or Alprazolam (Xanax),” or a “Statin such as Lovastatin (Mevacor). Simvastatin (Zocor), Atorvastatin (Lipitor), Pravastatin (Pravachol), Rosuvastatin (Crestor), or Fluvastatin (Lescol).” Similarly, Veterans were asked if they had “taken an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor such as lisinopril (Zestril, Prinivil), Enalapril (Vasotec), Captopril (Capoten),”and/or “angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) such as losartan (Cozaar), Irbesartan (Avapro), Valsartan (Diovan).” Unfortunately, data was not collected on use of anti-epileptic medications, or other commonly used potentially teratogenic medications. Female Veterans were then asked, “when your healthcare provider prescribed the medications listed above, did he/she tell you if these medications had any chance of causing a birth defect? (yes/no),” and “How confident are you that your healthcare provider would tell you if a medication you are taking might cause a birth defect?” Response options included: very confident, moderately confident, neither confident nor unconfident, moderately unconfident, and very unconfident; we dichotomized these responses by considering Veterans to have felt “confident” in receipt of this counseling if they reported they were very confident, moderately confident, neither confident or unconfident, or “unconfident” if they reported feeling either moderately or very unconfident, in order to most conservatively estimate the number of women Veterans who lack confidence that they will receive desired counseling.

Details of women’s reproductive health history were collected, including whether the Veteran was sexually active, had ever been pregnant, whether pregnancies had been planned, whether pregnancies resulted in abortion or birth, and whether any of the Veteran’s children had been affected by birth defects. In addition, Veterans were asked, “Were any of the pregnancies the result of sexual assault or abuse while in the military? (yes/no)” Veterans were asked whether they had a history of infertility and whether they had used condoms with last sex. Veterans’ recent use of hormonal contraception was self-reported; Veterans were asked, “During the past 12 months, have you taken prescription medicine for birth control?” In addition, Veterans were asked, “While in the military, did you ever have problems getting the birth control that you needed? (yes/no).”

Data were also collected on Veterans’ sociodemographic characteristics, self-reported health history, including substance abuse, and health services use. Specifically, the survey asked whether the Veteran received healthcare from the VA only, non-VA providers only, or received both VA and non-VA care, and whether the veteran had received care from a VA women’s health clinic. Veterans were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement, “The VA has good, quality health care.” Finally, Veterans were asked, “Do you plan to use the VA Healthcare system in the future?” and provided with the following response options: yes, as a primary source of care, as a back up to non-VA care, for prescriptions only, and no.

We tabulated responses to each of these questions and then used chi-square tests, or Fischer’s exact tests when appropriate, to examine whether female Veterans’ receipt of teratogenic risk counseling varied by the Veteran’s sociodemographic characteristics, health history, or where the Veteran received healthcare. In addition, we examined whether receipt of such counseling was associated with Veterans’ recent use of hormonal contraception. Finally, we examined the relationship between women’s use of potentially teratogenic medications in the last year and their confidence that they would be counseled about teratogenic risks. All analyses were done using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC); a priori, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the VA Connecticut and Yale University.

RESULTS

Of the 322 premenopausal female Veterans who completed surveys, 286 (89 %) female Veterans reported use of a prescription medication in the last 12 months. The mean age of these Veterans was 30.2 years; other sociodemographic characteristics of these Veterans are shown in Table 1. Most (88 %) of these female Veterans were sexually active. Less than half (48 %) of participating Veterans reported use of prescription contraception in the last 12 months (Table 2).

Table 1

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participating Female Veterans, By Self-Reported Receipt of Counseling About Risk of Medication-Induced Birth Defects (n = 286*)

	Total	Received counseling	No counseling	p-value†
	N (%)
Education				0.92
High School diploma or G.E.D.	73 (25)	16 (22)	56 (77)
Some college or Associates degree	69 (24)	17 (25)	51 (74)
College degree	108 (38)	25 (23)	83 (77)
Graduate or professional degree	36 (13)	10 (28)	26 (72)
Race/ethnicity				0.94
White, not Hispanic/ Latino	239 (84)	56 (23)	182 (76)
Black, not Hispanic/Latino	17 (6)	4 (24)	13 (76)
Hispanic/Latino	25 (9)	7 (28)	17 (68)
Asian or Pacific Islander	5 (2)	1 (20)	4 (80)
Married	116 (41)	32 (28)	83 (72)	0.41
Divorced	55 (19)	15 (27)	40 (73)
Separated	5 (2)	1 (20)	4 (80)
Widowed	4 (1)	0 (0)	4 (100)
Single	106 (37)	20 (19)	85 (80)
Living alone	64 (22)	15 (23)	48 (75)	0.98
With husband	106 (48)	27 (25)	78 (74)	0.78
With male partner or boyfriend	30 (14)	5 (17)	25 (83)	0.78
Annual income (own)				0.33
< $25,000	107 (37)	26 (25)	79 (75)
$25,001 – $50,000	92 (32)	15 (16)	77 (84)
$50,001 – $75,000	52 (18)	17 (33)	35 (67)
$75,001 – $100,000	25 (9)	8 (32)	17 (68)
$100,001 – $150,000	6 (2)	2 (33)	4 (67)
Refused/Don’t know	4 (2)	0 (0)	4 (100)
Current Private Health Insurance	160 (56)	36 (23)	124 (78)	0.52
Health Care from				0.42
Only from VA providers	47 (17)	14 (30)	32 (68)
Only from non-VA providers	45 (17)	9 (20)	36 (80)
Both VA and non-VA providers	186 (67)	41 (22)	144 (77)
VA Women’s Center patient	37 (32)	7 (19)	30 (81)	0.43

*We excluded from these analyses data from female veterans over 50 years of age, those who were using postmenopausal hormone therapy, and female veterans who had not used prescription medication in the last 12 months

†From chi-squared tests, or Fisher’s exact tests for overall differences in receipt of counseling by groups

Table 2

Reproductive Characteristics of Participating Female Veterans, By Self-Reported Receipt of Counseling About Risk of Medication-Induced Birth Defects (n = 286*)

	Total N (%)	Received counseling N (%)	No counseling N (%)	p-value‡
Sexually active	245 (86)	62 (25)	183 (74)	0.15
Prior pregnancy	173 (63)	44 (25)	129 (75)	0.27
Unintended pregnancy	126 (72)	32 (25)	94 (75)	0.61
Prior abortion	51 (29)	12 (24)	39 (76)	0.58
Prior birth	114 (66)	30 (26)	84 (74)	0.96
Prior birth defect	10 (6)	3 (30)	7 (70)	0.79
Infertility†	31 (11)	11 (35)	20 (65)	0.12
Used contraception
Condom with last sex	61 (22)	9 (15)	52 (85)	0.06
Hormonal method in last 12 months	136 (48)	38 (28)	98 (72)	0.16

*We excluded from these analyses data from female veterans over 50 years of age, veterans using postmenopausal hormone therapy, or veterans who had not used a prescription medication in the last 12 months

†Infertility measured as ever tried to become pregnant for >12 months

‡From chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests, when appropriate

Only 24 % of participating Veterans reported they had been told by a healthcare provider if their medications had any chance of causing birth defects. Receipt of teratogenic risk counseling by female Veterans was similar whether the Veteran received care within or outside the VA system, and whether the veteran had visited a VA women’s clinic (Table 1). Receipt of counseling about risk of medication-induced birth defects did not vary by education, race, marital status (Table 1), or reproductive history (Table 2). Women who used potentially teratogenic medications, such as an ACE-inhibitor or ARB, were not more likely to be warned about the risk of medication-induced birth defects, and in fact, tended to be less likely to receive such counseling, than women who used other medications (Table 3). Women who had been counseled about teratogenic risks tended to be more likely to use prescription contraception (56 % vs 46 %, p = 0.16), but this finding did not reach statistical significance.

Table 3

Self-Reported Receipt of Counseling about Risks of Medication-Induced Birth Defects and Confidence in Receiving Such Counseling

	Received counseling	Confident they would receive counseling
Any medication (n = 286)	24 %	90 %
Specific class D or X*medications: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (n = 4)	0 %	50 %
Benzodiazepine (n = 37)	22 %	81 %
Statin (n = 16)	19 %	81 %

*The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labels medications using five categories. Class A and B medications are those for which there is no evidence of fetal harm in humans. Class C designates drugs for which adequate studies are not available. Classes D and X are used to identify potentially teratogenic medications. Specifically, class D medications are those for which there is evidence of fetal risk, but “the potential benefits from the use of the drug in pregnant women may be acceptable despite its potential risks;” class X medications are “contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant”

The majority of female Veterans were confident that they would be told by their healthcare provider if a medication they were prescribed might cause a birth defect (41 % very confident, 29 % moderately confident, 19 % neither confident/unconfident). Only 7 % reported they were moderately unconfident, while 4 % were very unconfident that they would be counseled about teratogenic risks. However, women who had recently used a medication labeled by the FDA as potentially teratogenic were less confident that they would be counseled about teratogenic risks (Table 3). For example, confidence that they would receive teratogenic risk counseling was lower among the four women who reported use of an ACE-inhibitor or ARB than among women who were not using one of these medications (50 % vs 90 %, p = 0.05).

Veterans’ confidence that they would receive teratogenic risk counseling was not significantly associated with their sociodemographic characteristics. However, female Veterans were less likely to report confidence that they would receive teratogenic risk counseling if they had difficulty obtaining birth control while in the military (78 % vs 91 %, p = 0.04). Similarly, the 2.1 % of female Veterans (n = 6) who reported they had become pregnant as the result of military sexual trauma were less confident they would receive such counseling (67 % vs 91 %, p = 0.05). Veterans were also less confident they would receive such counseling if they had a history of drug use (e.g. marijuana (75 % vs 91 %, p = 0.02), alcohol (81 % vs 91 %, p = 0.04), or “tranquilizers or ‘nerve pills’ such as benzodiazepines without a doctor’s prescription” (71 % vs 91 %, p = 0.006)). In contrast, Veterans were more confident that they would be informed of teratogenic risks if they had previously had a pregnancy affected by birth defects.

Veterans who were confident that they would receive teratogenic risk counseling were more likely to agree with the statement that the “VA provides good quality healthcare,” p = 0.04, and to indicate that they planned to use the VA as a primary source of healthcare in the future (85 % vs 94 %, p = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

We found that only a quarter of young female Veterans reported that their healthcare provider had warned them of teratogenic risks with medication use. This is concerning, as half the study participants reported no use of contraception, and thus may be at risk of unintended pregnancy. Given the relatively small size of this study, all associations identified should be viewed primarily as hypothesis-generating. However, as prior studies have found that half of female Veterans are dispensed potentially teratogenic medications,7 these findings indicate that need for ongoing efforts to ensure that female Veterans receive appropriate counseling when they are prescribed medications that can cause birth defects. Although the VA has only recently expanded its focus to include female Veterans, outside the VA this issue requires similar attention, as studies from multiple clinical settings have found that women of childbearing potentially are frequently prescribed potentially teratogenic medications.4,6,11,12

In order to help women optimize their health before pregnancy, comprehensive preconception counseling must include information about medication risks, alternative treatments that may be considered if pregnancy is desired, and effective methods of contraception if pregnancy is not desired. Unfortunately, many primary care physicians have limited knowledge of both teratogenic risks13 and rates of unintended pregnancy14; thus, ensuring that women receive teratogenic risk counseling may require ongoing clinician education. Currently, the VA is addressing this challenge by offering clinicians “mini-residencies” in Women’s Health. Educational efforts modeled after those that have successfully encouraged clinicians to screen for depression15,16 may also be useful. Clinical decision support has been proposed as a way to alert clinicians to the need for teratogenic risk counseling,17 but refinement and evaluation of such decision support systems remain needed. Involving pharmacists in efforts to notify women about medication risks may also be of benefit. However, prior efforts to use laboratory and ultrasound data to alert dispensing pharmacists to pregnancies had unacceptably high rates of misidentification of ongoing pregnancy.18 In addition, women have indicated that they prefer to discuss plans for pregnancy with their primary care provider in the privacy of the clinic, rather than in pharmacy settings.19 Thus, if pharmacists are to be involved in providing reproductive health counseling, attention must be given to ensuring patient privacy for discussions in pharmacies or other clinical settings.

Although the large majority of female Veterans trusted that their health care providers would provide them with information about teratogenic risks, Veterans who had received medications that were labeled as potentially teratogenic, such as ACE-I and ARB, without discussing these risks with their prescribing clinician had less confidence in their healthcare providers. Similarly, women who had ever had difficulties accessing desired services (e.g., contraception) in the military were less likely to trust they would receive counseling about teratogenic risks.

Patients’ trust in their healthcare providers is important for many reasons.20–23 For example, trust in healthcare providers has been associated with adherence to therapeutic regimens,24 receipt of needed services,25 and health outcomes.26 Thus, appropriately alerting female patients to teratogenic risks can be seen as part of the larger mission of earning our patients trust in order to effectively work with them to improve health outcomes.

Limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size and limited response rate. We conducted multiple comparisons, which may increase the chance of type 1 error; thus, none of our findings should be considered definitive, but rather as hypothesis-generating. We have no information on the ways Veterans who responded to this survey may differ from those who did not; however, this study population was more educated, and included fewer Black Veterans than nationally representative samples, which are 30 % Black.7 As WVCS did not ask women about their use of all potentially teratogenic medications, it is not possible to estimate whether women in this sample were more or less likely to use potentially teratogenic medications than the average female Veteran. In addition, we have no data on the quality, timing or content of the counseling Veterans received about risks of medication-induced birth defects. Veterans’ responses to the question about how confident they were that they would receive teratogenic risk counseling when needed may have been affected by the survey’s first asking whether women had received such counseling.

Nonetheless, relatively few women Veterans reported they had been told their medications had any chance of causing a birth defect. Thus, these findings support other recent work17 in indicating that efforts remain needed to ensure that all women receive appropriate counseling when medications that can cause birth defects are prescribed. Recent changes in VA women’s healthcare, such as the implementation of comprehensive primary care to eliminate fragmentation and gaps in women Veterans’ care, efforts to educate VA primary care providers in basic women’s health, including preconception care, through Women’s Health Mini-Residencies, development of a preconception care template, and multiple educational conferences have all been designed to ensure the VA provides women Veterans the best possible care. Private sector health care providers should join VA providers in striving to meet these new national standards for provision of comprehensive Women’s Health care.