Literature DB >> 23807060

Racial/ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk factors among women veterans.

Danielle E Rose1, Melissa M Farmer, Elizabeth M Yano, Donna L Washington.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart disease is the leading cause of death for women in the United States, accounting for 24.5 % of all deaths among women. Earlier research has demonstrated racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of cardiovascular (CVD) risk factors.
OBJECTIVE: To empirically examine the prevalence of CVD risk factors among a national sample of women Veterans by race/ethnicity, providing the first portrait of women Veterans' cardiovascular care needs. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, national population-based telephone survey of 3,611 women Veterans. MEASUREMENTS: Women Veterans were queried about presence of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, tobacco use and physical activity. Four racial/ethnic categories were created: Hispanic, Non-Hispanic White (White), Non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Other. Logistic regressions were conducted for each risk factor to test for racial/ethnic differences, controlling for age (under 40 vs. 40 and over). KEY
RESULTS: Racial/ethnic differences in CVD risk factors persisted after adjusting for age. Black women Veterans were more likely to report a diagnosis of diabetes (OR: 2.58, 95 % CI: 1.07, 6.21) or hypertension (OR: 2.31, 95 % CI: 1.10, 4.83) and be obese (OR: 2.06, 95 % CI: 1.05, 3.91) than White women Veterans. Hispanic women Veterans were more likely than White women Veterans to report diabetes (OR: 4.20, 95 % CI: 1.15, 15.39) and daily smoking (OR: 3.38, 95 % CI: 1.01, 11.30), but less likely to report a hypertension diagnosis (OR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.64) or to be obese (OR: 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.18, 0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Among women Veterans, CVD risks vary by race/ethnicity. Black women Veterans consistently face higher CVD risk compared to White women Veterans, while results are mixed for Hispanic women Veterans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807060      PMCID: PMC3695277          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2309-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


INTRODUCTION

Heart disease is the leading cause of death for women in the United States, accounting for 24.5 % of all deaths among women.1 Research has demonstrated age-adjusted differences in heart disease-related mortality by race and ethnicity. Specifically, Non-Hispanic Black (Black) women have higher heart disease-related mortality compared to Non-Hispanic White (White) women. In contrast, ethnicity appears to be protective against heart disease-related mortality: Hispanic women experience lower heart disease-related mortality compared to White women.1 These heart disease-related mortality differences reflect, at least in part, racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, obesity, tobacco use, and physical inactivity). For example, Black women carry a greater burden of cardiovascular disease compared to White or Mexican-American women.2 Blacks and Hispanics have higher prevalence rates of diabetes compared to Whites. Black women have higher rates of diagnosed hypertension, compared to Hispanic and White women. Black and Hispanic women are more likely to be obese than White women. Current tobacco use was nearly double among Black and White women, compared to Hispanic women. Racial/ethnic differences in physical inactivity rates also exist: about half of Black and Hispanic women were considered inactive, compared to one-third of White women.3 Efforts to reduce these racial/ethnic and gender disparities in CVD risk, disease and mortality will likely require both healthcare delivery and public health approaches to improved screening, assessment and treatment. Despite the Veterans Health Administration’s (VA) substantial efforts to reduce CVD risk, significant gender disparities in CVD risks have persisted.4 While the number of women Veterans using the VA healthcare system has doubled in the past decade,5 the vast majority of women Veterans use private and other public healthcare providers, making CVD risk factors for women Veterans a salient issue not only for VA providers, but also primary care providers nationwide. The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the prevalence of CVD risk factors among women Veterans by race and ethnicity, providing the first portrait of their cardiovascular care needs regardless of VA use. We capitalize on a unique data source—the National Survey of Women Veterans (NSWV) (2008-09).

METHODS

Data Sources

The NSWV, a cross-sectional national telephone survey of U.S. women Veterans, was conducted to support evidence-based VA strategic planning for programs and services. Administered in 2008-09, the NSWV enrolled a population-based, stratified random sample of women Veterans. Stratification was based on VA ambulatory care use (VA user and nonuser) and period of military service [ending date of military service prior to the Vietnam era; service in Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF); and all other military service periods combined] using previously described methods.6 Survey respondents represented all U.S. geographic regions. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, and the survey was also approved by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.

Sample

We cross-linked Veterans Health Administration, Veterans Benefits Administration, and Department of Defense databases that collectively identified more than 50 % of the 1.8 million U.S. women Veterans.6 Inclusion criteria were being a women Veteran of the regular Armed Forces, or a member of the National Guard or Reserves who had been called to active duty. To recruit participants, an advance information packet was mailed to each randomly sampled veteran. Study interviewers contacted potential respondents 10–14 days after packets were mailed, and screened them for study eligibility prior to obtaining consent and conducting a computer-assisted telephone interview. Potential respondents were offered study enrollment if they were not currently serving on active military duty, not employed by the VA, and not institutionalized. The NSWV enrolled 3,611 women Veterans (86 % of those screened and eligible), and included 1,993 VA users and 1,618 VA nonusers. All analyses applied weights to account for disproportional allocation of the population by strata, so that resulting estimates are representative of the U.S. women Veteran population.

Dependent Variables

We queried women Veterans about diagnosed medical conditions, personal health practices and the presence of cardiovascular risks factors, to identify five dependent variables: self-reported diabetes, hypertension, obesity, tobacco use and physical activity. Diabetes and hypertension were defined by affirmative responses to the following questions: “Please tell me if a doctor or nurse has ever told you that you had any of the following health problems: diabetes; hypertension or high blood pressure.” Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30, and calculated from self-reported height and weight. Daily smoking was derived from the following question: “Do you smoke every day, some days, or not at all?” with respondents who indicated they smoke every day designated as daily smokers. For physical activity, we asked, “On average, how many days per week do you exercise at least 30 min, enough to make you breathe hard and/or sweat?” If respondents indicated they did not exercise at least 1 day per week, they were indicated as physically inactive.

Independent Variables

We ascertained Hispanic or Latino ethnic origin, and then self-reported race to create four mutually exclusive categories: Hispanic, Non-Hispanic White (White), Non-Hispanic Black (Black), and all other. Respondents who did not indicate a race and/or ethnicity (< 3 %) were categorized as other. To be consistent with the American Heart Association recommendation that everyone know their risk factors by age 40 and reassess them every 5 years,7 we categorized self-reported age as 18–39 years and 40 or older.

Statistical Methods

To examine the association between race/ethnicity and each CVD risk factor, we performed chi-square tests to examine presence of racial/ethnic differences on the weighted sample. We then performed separate weighted logistic regressions for each CVD risk factor to compare each racial/ethnic group with White, controlling for age. We present age-adjusted differences, but do not adjust for socioeconomic status (SES), because we are examining the impact of race/ethnicity (and its associated characteristics) on CVD risk. The rationale is based on using provider-level and system-level perspectives on clinical care presentations (i.e., providers cannot adjust away the SES differences in their patient panels).

RESULTS

Table 1 reports demographic and CVD risk factors among women Veterans by racial/ethnic group. We found significant racial/ethnic differences in age, education, employment, health insurance, VA use and three of five CVD risk factors (hypertension, obesity and smoking). Racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of CVD risk factors were found after adjusting for age (Table 2). Black women Veterans, in comparison to White women Veterans, were more likely to report a diabetes (OR: 2.58, 95 % CI: 1.07, 6.21) or hypertension diagnosis (OR: 2.31, 95 % CI: 1.10, 4.83). In terms of lifestyle behaviors, Black women Veterans were more likely to be obese compared to White women Veterans (OR: 2.06, 95 % CI: 1.05, 3.91). Hispanic women Veterans, compared to White women Veterans, were more likely to report a diabetes diagnosis (OR: 4.20, 95 % CI: 1.15, 15.39) and daily smoking (OR: 3.38, 95 % CI: 1.01, 11.30), but they were less likely to report a hypertension diagnosis (OR: 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.07, 0.64) or to be obese (OR: 0.38, 95 % CI: 0.18, 0.81). Age (greater than 40 years) was positively associated with report of hypertension (OR: 6.51, 95 % CI: 3.08, 13.78) or diabetes diagnosis (OR: 3.71, 95 % CI: 1.12, 12.19). There were no racial/ethnic differences in reports of physical inactivity.
Table 1

Sample Description of Women Veterans by Race/Ethnicity

AllWhiteBlackHispanicOtherp-value
N = 3,611n = 2,575n = 477n = 213n = 346
Race/ethnicity77 %11 %5 %7 %
Age Group< 0.001
 18–39 years old19 %14 %42 %47 %20 %
 40 years old or older81 %86 %58 %53 %80 %
Education0.005
 College Graduate48 %48 %53 %12 %55 %
Marital status
 Married58 %57 %56 %68 %56 %
Employment0.005
 Working46 %41 %64 %66 %54 %
Health insurance coverage< 0.001
 Medicare32 %36 %14 %4 %26 %
 Health insurance (other)57 %54 %66 %82 %61 %
 No insurance11 %10 %20 %14 %13 %
Household income
 Less than $30,00023 %20 %38 %33 %24 %
 $30,001 to $50,00021 %22 %16 %15 %23 %
 Greater than $50,00056 %58 %46 %52 %53 %
Reported VA health care use in past 12 months
 VA user14 %12 %22 %16 %18 %0.004
Cardiovascular risk factors
 Diabetes10 %8 %15 %21 %15 %
 Hypertension40 %40 %47 %9 %46 %0.02
 Obese26 %25 %42 %12 %26 %0.02
 Smoke daily12 %12 %8 %32 %3 %0.005
 Physically inactive26 %26 %28 %34 %26 %
Table 2

Logistic Regression Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Women Veterans (n = 3,611)

DiabetesHypertensionObeseSmoke DailyPhysically Inactive
OR (95 % CI)OR (95 % CI)OR (95 % CI)OR (95 % CI)OR (95 % CI)
Race/Ethnicity
Black2.58 (1.07, 6.21)*2.31 (1.10, 4.83)*2.06 (1.05, 3.91)*0.61 (0.32, 1.18)1.18 (0.57, 2.43)
Hispanic4.20 (1.15, 15.39)*0.21 (0.07, 0.64)**0.38 (0.18, 0.81)*3.38 (1.01, 11.30)*1.59 (0.57, 4.46)
Other race2.09 (0.82, 5.32)1.44 (0.68, 3.05)1.04 (0.47, 2.30)0.24 (0.12, 0.49)***0.86 (0.78, 1.97)
WhiteReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Age (years)
Age 18–39ReferenceReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
Age 40 and older3.71 (1.12, 12.19)*6.51 (3.08, 13.78)***0.80 (0.46, 1.42)1.20 (0.48, 3.02)1.25 (0.69, 2.27)

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

Sample Description of Women Veterans by Race/Ethnicity Logistic Regression Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Factors among Women Veterans (n = 3,611) * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001

DISCUSSION

There are significant age-adjusted racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of four of five CVD risk factors among women Veterans. Black women Veterans had higher prevalence of three of five risk factors (diabetes, hypertension and obesity) compared to White women Veterans. The results for Hispanic women Veterans were mixed. Hispanic women Veterans had higher prevalence for two of five risk factors (diabetes and smoking), but lower prevalence for two other risk factors (hypertension and obesity) compared to White women Veterans. Prior research at one VA medical center found that 67 % of women Veterans were categorized as having an increased risk (e.g., moderate or high risk) of CVD based on a modified Framingham cardiovascular risk score.8 The current study adds to the evidence base about women Veterans’ CVD risk by being the first study to document racial/ethnic disparities in prevalence of CVD risk factors in a national sample of women Veterans not limited to VA users. While earlier studies have found racial/ethnic differences in reports of physical inactivity,2 we did not find such differences among women Veterans. The proportion of women Veterans reporting no physical activity was somewhat surprising, given the physical fitness levels required during military service. To mitigate CVD risk among women Veterans, further study may be needed to identify the determinants of sustained physical activity among women Veterans after separating from the military, and also to examine potential barriers to weight management. The substantial proportion of women Veterans with CVD risk factors will require focused effort to promote optimal health among White and minority women Veterans. Prior research has demonstrated the value of gender-specific approaches to risk factor reduction among women Veterans. For example, women Veterans have higher smoking rates compared to male Veterans,9 and previous studies have shown that women Veterans prefer women-only smoking cessation groups, which may mitigate gender disparities.10 Further study should also assess why these risk differences occur, e.g., why Hispanic women Veterans have higher smoking rates compared to White and Black women Veterans. It is also important to determine whether culturally tailored approaches to risk factor reduction would benefit Black and Hispanic women Veterans. Recent research has demonstrated, for example, the potential value of enhanced health literacy among minority male Veterans, but neither gender differences nor gender-sensitive adaptations have been studied. While the VA healthcare system has reduced many access barriers,11 and achieved substantial and widespread improvement in quality of care,12,13 persistent gender and racial/ethnic disparities present VA with a challenge and opportunity for quality improvement.14,15 Focused efforts to tackle these disparities in the VA have resulted in early successes in reducing gender disparities in some areas, but not CVD risk.16 To ensure that all veterans benefit from VA care equally, more research is needed on gender-sensitive and culturally appropriate approaches to risk reduction, supplementing current VA-wide interventions. Outside the VA, where the vast majority of 1.8 million women Veterans in the U.S. still obtain their care, these racial/ethnic differences also have salience for community providers. While the National Survey of Women Veterans offers a unique source of data to better understand the healthcare needs of the population of women Veterans, we lack data on high blood cholesterol (hyperlipidemia), which would have provided a more comprehensive profile of cardiovascular risk. The prevalence of risk factors are also based on self-report. While we used previously validated survey measures, future work would benefit from augmentation with chart review. The number of women Veterans seeking care in VA is dramatically increasing.5 The recently deployed [e.g., Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF)] cohort of women Veterans is much more racially and ethnically diverse than earlier cohorts of women Veterans.17 Given the evidence of racial/ethnic differences in prevalence of CVD risk factors, these findings have important policy and planning implications for disparities reduction. Tailored interventions focused on reducing mutable CVD risk factors (e.g., smoking, obesity) to minority women Veterans (e.g., Black and Hispanic women Veterans) are needed. While the VA has performance measures for smoking and diabetic hypertension and glycemic control, there are no measures prompting action on weight management and physical activity promotion. In addition, racial/ethnic-specific performance measurements linked to consequent quality improvement are needed.
  13 in total

1.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Systematic review: comparison of the quality of medical care in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs settings.

Authors:  Amal N Trivedi; Sierra Matula; Isomi Miake-Lye; Peter A Glassman; Paul Shekelle; Steven Asch
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Racial/ethnic variations in veterans' ambulatory care use.

Authors:  Donna L Washington; Valentine Villa; Arleen Brown; JoAnn Damron-Rodriguez; Nancy Harada
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Despite improved quality of care in the Veterans Affairs health system, racial disparity persists for important clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Amal N Trivedi; Regina C Grebla; Steven M Wright; Donna L Washington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Systematic review of women veterans' health: update on successes and gaps.

Authors:  Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Elizabeth M Yano; Donna L Washington; Caroline Goldzweig; Fatma Batuman; Christine Huang; Isomi Miake-Lye; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

6.  Gender differences in smoking and smoking cessation treatment: an examination of the organizational features related to care.

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Danielle E Rose; Deborah Riopelle; Andy B Lanto; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

7.  Gender disparities in lipid-lowering therapy among veterans with diabetes.

Authors:  Varsha G Vimalananda; Donald R Miller; Madhuri Palnati; Cindy L Christiansen; B Graeme Fincke
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

8.  Deaths: leading causes for 2008.

Authors:  Melonie Heron
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2012-06-06

9.  Combining women's preferences and expert advice to design a tailored smoking cessation program.

Authors:  Judith R Katzburg; Elizabeth M Yano; Donna L Washington; Melissa M Farmer; Ellen F T Yee; Steven Fu; Irene Trowell-Harris; Scott E Sherman
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.164

10.  Risk factor treatment in veteran women at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Debra L Canter; Marvin D Atkins; Catherine J McNeal; Ruth L Bush
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  13 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Knowledge of Personal and Target Levels of Cardiovascular Health Indicators.

Authors:  Mindy Ma; Alyson Ma
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-10

2.  Physiologic and psychosocial changes of the menopause transition in US Latinas: a narrative review.

Authors:  Y I Cortés; V Marginean; D Berry
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Race/Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation Disparities in Mental Health, Sexism, and Social Support among Women Veterans.

Authors:  Keren Lehavot; Kerry L Beckman; Jessica A Chen; Tracy L Simpson; Emily C Williams
Journal:  Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers       Date:  2019

4.  Setting the stage: Research to inform interventions, practice and policy to improve women veterans' health and health care.

Authors:  Lori A Bastian; Hayden B Bosworth; Donna L Washington; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Fractions in Marginalized Roma versus Majority Population.

Authors:  Beáta Hubková; Gabriel Bódy; Jana Mašlanková; Anna Birková; Eugen Frišman; Vladimír Kraus; Mária Mareková
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Relationship Between Obesity, Hypertension, and Aldosterone Production in Postmenopausal African American Women: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Luke J Laffin; Colleen Majewski; Chuanhong Liao; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Time Trends in Racial/Ethnic Differences in COVID-19 Infection and Mortality.

Authors:  Michelle S Wong; Taona P Haderlein; Anita H Yuan; Ernest Moy; Kenneth T Jones; Donna L Washington
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Veterans and risk of heart disease in the United States: a cohort with 20 years of follow up.

Authors:  Shervin Assari
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06

9.  Comparison of the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria to predict mortality in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Talita Machado Levi; Sérgio Pinto de Souza; Janine Garcia de Magalhães; Márcia Sampaio de Carvalho; André Luiz Barreto Cunha; João Gabriel Athayde de Oliveira Dantas; Marília Galvão Cruz; Yasmin Laryssa Moura Guimarães; Constança Margarida Sampaio Cruz
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

10.  Ethnic differences in prevalence and risk factors for hypertension in the Suriname Health Study: a cross sectional population study.

Authors:  Ingrid S K Krishnadath; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Lenny M Nahar-van Venrooij; Jerry R Toelsie
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2016-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.