Literature DB >> 23806826

Resource-efficient mobilization programs in the intensive care unit: who stands to win?

John W Mah1, Ilene Staff, David Fichandler, Karyn L Butler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional outcomes can improve with early intensive care unit (ICU) mobilization programs but require additional resources. Details regarding resource allotment and methods to deliver therapy are lacking. We describe an effective team-based, resource-efficient mobility program (REMP).
METHODS: Consecutive admissions (November 2009 to March 2010) underwent an evaluation by a physical therapist and participation in the REMP. Sitting balance (SB), transfer from bed to chair, and ambulation were assessed on the initial evaluation and compared with ICU and hospital discharge using the Functional Independence Measure scale.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients entered the REMP, and 31 patients served as controls. There were no differences in baseline characteristics or initial Functional Independence Measure scores for ambulation or SB. Bed-to-chair evaluation was higher in the controls (P < .024). Both groups improved across the 3 time periods on all measures; however, more REMP patients had a significantly improved SB at ICU and hospital discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: A team-based, resource-efficient approach to early mobilization is feasible and effective in the ICU.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulation; Critical care; Mobility; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23806826     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

Review 1.  Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness.

Authors:  Bronwen Connolly; Lisa Salisbury; Brenda O'Neill; Louise Geneen; Abdel Douiri; Michael P W Grocott; Nicholas Hart; Timothy S Walsh; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-22

2.  Mechanical ventilation and mobilization: comparison between genders.

Authors:  Christiane Riedi Daniel; Carla Alessandra de Matos; Jessica Barbosa de Meneses; Suzane Chaves Machado Bucoski; Andersom Ricardo Fréz; Cintia Teixeira Rossato Mora; João Afonso Ruaro
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Physical rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit: a scoping review of 117 studies.

Authors:  Julie C Reid; Janelle Unger; Devin McCaskell; Laura Childerhose; David J Zorko; Michelle E Kho
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-12-07

4.  Improving Mobility in Critically Ill Patients in a Tertiary Care ICU: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Sneha Mohan; Sristi Patodia; Sudha Kumaravel; Ramesh Venkataraman; Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-01

Review 5.  Respiratory Support Adjustments and Monitoring of Mechanically Ventilated Patients Performing Early Mobilization: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Felipe González-Seguel; Agustín Camus-Molina; Anita Jasmén; Jorge Molina; Rodrigo Pérez-Araos; Jerónimo Graf
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 6.  Safety criteria to start early mobilization in intensive care units. Systematic review.

Authors:  Thais Martins Albanaz da Conceição; Ana Inês Gonzáles; Fernanda Cabral Xavier Sarmento de Figueiredo; Danielle Soares Rocha Vieira; Daiana Cristine Bündchen
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Mobility Programs for the Hospitalized Older Adult: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Denise A Smart; Gordana Dermody; Melany E Coronado; Marian Wilson
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2018-11-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.