Joshua Bauml1, Rosemarie Mick2, Yu Zhang3, Christopher D Watt4, Anil Vachani1, Charu Aggarwal1, Tracey Evans1, Corey Langer1. 1. Abramson Cancer Center, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Department of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 3. Department of Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mutations in EGFR and KRAS can impact treatment decisions for patients with NSCLC. The incidence of these mutations varies, and it is unclear whether there is a decreased frequency among African Americans (AfAs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 513 NSCLC patients undergoing EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between May 2008 and November 2011. Clinical and pathologic data were abstracted from the patients' electronic medical record. RESULTS: Of 497 patients with informative EGFR mutation analyses, the frequency of EGFR mutation was 13.9%. The frequency of EGFR mutations was associated with race (p < 0.001) and was lower in AfA patients compared to Caucasian (C) patients but did not reach statistical significance (4.8% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.06). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index and number of cigarette pack years were significantly lower in patients with EGFR mutations (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between race and EGFR mutation (p = 0.01), even after adjusting for smoking status (p < 0.001) and gender (p = 0.03). KRAS mutation (study frequency 28.1%) was not associated with race (p = 0.08; p=0.51 for Afa vs. C patients), but was more common among smokers (p < 0.001) and females (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on multivariable analysis, even after adjusting for smoking status and gender, we found that race was statistically significantly associated with EGFR mutation, but not KRAS mutational status. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single institution series to date evaluating racial differences in EGFR and KRAS mutational status among patients with NSCLC.
INTRODUCTION: Mutations in EGFR and KRAS can impact treatment decisions for patients with NSCLC. The incidence of these mutations varies, and it is unclear whether there is a decreased frequency among African Americans (AfAs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 513 NSCLCpatients undergoing EGFR and KRAS mutational analysis at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between May 2008 and November 2011. Clinical and pathologic data were abstracted from the patients' electronic medical record. RESULTS: Of 497 patients with informative EGFR mutation analyses, the frequency of EGFR mutation was 13.9%. The frequency of EGFR mutations was associated with race (p < 0.001) and was lower in AfApatients compared to Caucasian (C) patients but did not reach statistical significance (4.8% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.06). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index and number of cigarette pack years were significantly lower in patients with EGFR mutations (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between race and EGFR mutation (p = 0.01), even after adjusting for smoking status (p < 0.001) and gender (p = 0.03). KRAS mutation (study frequency 28.1%) was not associated with race (p = 0.08; p=0.51 for Afa vs. C patients), but was more common among smokers (p < 0.001) and females (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on multivariable analysis, even after adjusting for smoking status and gender, we found that race was statistically significantly associated with EGFR mutation, but not KRAS mutational status. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single institution series to date evaluating racial differences in EGFR and KRAS mutational status among patients with NSCLC.
Authors: D L Aisner; C Deshpande; Z Baloch; C D Watt; L A Litzky; B Malhotra; A R Sepulveda; C Langer; T Evans; V M Van Deerlin Journal: Diagn Cytopathol Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 1.582
Authors: Sei Hoon Yang; Leah E Mechanic; Ping Yang; Maria Teresa Landi; Elise D Bowman; Jason Wampfler; Daoud Meerzaman; Kyeong Man Hong; Felicia Mann; Tatiana Dracheva; Junya Fukuoka; William Travis; Neil E Caporaso; Curtis C Harris; Jin Jen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William Pao; Vincent Miller; Maureen Zakowski; Jennifer Doherty; Katerina Politi; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bhuvanesh Singh; Robert Heelan; Valerie Rusch; Lucinda Fulton; Elaine Mardis; Doris Kupfer; Richard Wilson; Mark Kris; Harold Varmus Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gregory J Riely; William Pao; Duykhanh Pham; Allan R Li; Naiyer Rizvi; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P Keohavong; M A DeMichele; A C Melacrinos; R J Landreneau; R J Weyant; J M Siegfried Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Haiying Cheng; H Dean Hosgood; Lei Deng; Kenny Ye; Christopher Su; Janaki Sharma; Yuanquan Yang; Balazs Halmos; Roman Perez-Soler Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Christine M Lusk; Donovan Watza; Greg Dyson; Douglas Craig; Valerie Ratliff; Angela S Wenzlaff; Fulvio Lonardo; Aliccia Bollig-Fischer; Gerold Bepler; Kristen Purrington; Shirish Gadgeel; Ann G Schwartz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Luiz H Araujo; Cynthia Timmers; Erica Hlavin Bell; Konstantin Shilo; Philip E Lammers; Weiqiang Zhao; Thanemozhi G Natarajan; Clinton J Miller; Jianying Zhang; Ayse S Yilmaz; Tom Liu; Kevin Coombes; Joseph Amann; David P Carbone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 44.544