Literature DB >> 23806525

Pathologic definition and number of lymphovascular emboli: impact on lymph node metastasis in endoscopically resected early gastric cancer.

Won-Young Park1, Nari Shin, Joo-Yeon Kim, Tae-Yong Jeon, Gwang Ha Kim, Hyunki Kim, Do Youn Park.   

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted as an appropriate treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC). Accepted indications for ESD are mostly based on the risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis in EGC. The presence of lymphovascular emboli (LVEs) is the most important risk factor for predicting LN metastasis, but the criteria for diagnosing LVEs are inconsistent and controversial. Here, we defined LVE as the presence of tumor cells within a space according to the following criteria: (1) red cells or lymphocytes surrounding the tumor cells, (2) an endothelial cell lining, and (3) attachment to the vascular wall. We reviewed a series of 102 patients with EGC who underwent gastrectomy after ESD, evaluated the definition of LVE, counted the number of LVEs in ESD specimens, and validated the significance of the definition and number of LVEs with regard to the presence of LN metastasis in gastrectomy specimens using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Overall, 13 instances (12.7%) of LN metastasis were identified among 102 patients with EGC who underwent gastrectomy after ESD. The LN metastasis-positive group showed higher numbers of definite (4.46 ± 2.45 versus 0.19 ± 0.07), suspicious (3.15 ± 0.76 versus 0.62 ± 0.14), and probable (1.62 ± 0.43 versus 0.43 ± 0.10) LVEs in ESD specimens than the LN metastasis-negative group. In ROC analysis, the area under the ROC curve was 0.851 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.711-0.991) for definite LVEs, compared with 0.82 (95% CI, 0.698-0.960) for suspicious LVEs and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.549-0.891) for probable LVEs. We recommend the use of strict LVE criteria to predict LN metastasis and determine the need for surgical intervention after ESD.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Definition; Early gastric cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Lymph node metastasis; Lymphovascular emboli

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23806525     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  11 in total

1.  Optimal management for patients not meeting the inclusion criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Toyokawa; Masaichi Ohira; Hiroaki Tanaka; Hiroaki Minamino; Katsunobu Sakurai; Yasuaki Nagami; Naoshi Kubo; Atsushi Yamamoto; Koji Sano; Kazuya Muguruma; Kazunari Tominaga; Hiroko Nebiki; Yoshito Yamashita; Tetsuo Arakawa; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Feasible endoscopic therapy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tian-Jiao Guo; Jin-Yu Qin; Lin-Lin Zhu; Jin Wang; Jin-Lin Yang; Yi-Ping Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for papillary adenocarcinoma of the stomach: is it really safe?

Authors:  Hyun Jung Lee; Gwang Ha Kim; Do Youn Park; Young Keum Kim; Hye Kyung Jeon; Bong Eun Lee; Geun Am Song
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Unveiling lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nari Shin; Tae-Yong Jeon; Gwang Ha Kim; Do Youn Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Endoscopic Resection for Early Gastric Cancer beyond Absolute Indication with Emphasis on Controversial Issues.

Authors:  Yang Won Min; Jun Haeng Lee
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Unavoidable human errors of tumor size measurement during specimen attachment after endoscopic resection: a clinical prospective study.

Authors:  Hirohito Mori; Hideki Kobara; Takaaki Tsushimi; Noriko Nishiyama; Shintaro Fujihara; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictors of lymph node metastasis and residual tumor in early gastric cancer patients after noncurative endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bolun Jiang; Li Zhou; Jun Lu; Yizhi Wang; Junchao Guo
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 8.  Additional gastrectomy in early-stage gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Run-Cong Nie; Shu-Qiang Yuan; Yuan-Fang Li; Shi Chen; Yong-Ming Chen; Xiao-Jiang Chen; Guo-Ming Chen; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-03-08

9.  Identification and external validation of a novel miRNA signature for lymph node metastasis prediction in submucosal-invasive gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Mingzhe Ma; Shixun Lu; Yinhua Liu; Pengfei Kong; Ziwen Long; Ping Wan; Yan Zhang; Yanong Wang; Dazhi Xu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  A nomogram to predict risk of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Miaoquan Zhang; Chao Ding; Lin Xu; Shoucheng Feng; Yudong Ling; Jianrong Guo; Yao Liang; Zhiwei Zhou; Yingbo Chen; Haibo Qiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.