Literature DB >> 23806460

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy given by subcutaneous rapid push vs infusion pump: a retrospective analysis.

Ralph S Shapiro1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) via rapid push, an alternative to infusion pump delivery, can offer heightened simplicity and convenience for patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD).
OBJECTIVE: To assess dosing and administration patterns, serum IgG responses, safety, and tolerability of the subcutaneous (SC) rapid push technique.
METHODS: A retrospective medical record review captured data on 173 patients with PIDD (1,140 follow-up visits) who self-administered SCIG (16% or 20%) via infusion pump or SC rapid push.
RESULTS: Serum IgG levels increased from a mean (SD) trough of 903.8 (285.4) mg/dL during intravenous immunoglobulin use to a steady-state mean (SD) of 1,121.6 (257.6) mg/dL on SCIG. Mean frequency of weekly SCIG administration was 2.3 days per week with pump and 2.8 days per week with SC rapid push. Mean serum IgG levels were higher among push vs pump users (1,164 vs 1,048 mg/dL). Mean (SD) SCIG volume administered per infusion site with SC rapid push was 15.0 (7.3) mL (maximum, 60.0 mL). Most patients using SC rapid push infused in 9 minutes or less; median pump infusion duration was 49 minutes. Use of 20% SCIG was associated with smaller mean weekly product volumes vs 16% SCIG (41.7 vs 51.0 mL) and fewer mean dosing days per week (2.0 vs 2.8 days). Adverse events, primarily local, were reported on fewer visits with SC rapid push (15.6%) than with infusion pump (20.7%).
CONCLUSION: The SC rapid push technique is a safe, viable alternative to an infusion pump, seemingly preferred by patients and offering more rapid administration.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23806460     DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  12 in total

1.  Use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary immune deficiencies.

Authors:  Elif Karakoç Aydıner; Ayça Kıykım; Safa Barış; Ahmet Özen; Işıl Barlan
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2016-03-01

2.  Subcutaneous immunoglobulin: facilitated infusion and advances in administration.

Authors:  R L Wasserman
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Current treatment options with immunoglobulin G for the individualization of care in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease.

Authors:  S Jolles; J S Orange; A Gardulf; M R Stein; R Shapiro; M Borte; M Berger
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Long-Term Treatment and Transfusion of Normal Blood Components Following Tolerance Induction in Patients with Anti-IgA Anaphylactic Reactions.

Authors:  Abdulgabar Salama; Romina Kardashi; Olga Arbach
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Enhancing Patient Flexibility of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G Dosing: Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of Various Maintenance and Loading Regimens in the Treatment of Primary Immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Jagdev Sidhu; Mikhail Rojavin; Marc Pfister; Jonathan Edelman
Journal:  Biol Ther       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 6.  Is dosing of therapeutic immunoglobulins optimal? A review of a three-decade long debate in europe.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Isabella Quinti; Martha Eibl; Helen Chapel; Peter J Späth; W A Carrock Sewell; Abdulgabar Salama; Ivo N van Schaik; Taco W Kuijpers; Hans-Hartmut Peter
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  II Brazilian Consensus on the use of human immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Ekaterini Simões Goudouris; Almerinda Maria do Rego Silva; Aluce Loureiro Ouricuri; Anete Sevciovic Grumach; Antonio Condino-Neto; Beatriz Tavares Costa-Carvalho; Carolina Cardoso Prando; Cristina Maria Kokron; Dewton de Moraes Vasconcelos; Fabíola Scancetti Tavares; Gesmar Rodrigues Silva Segundo; Irma Cecília Barreto; Mayra de Barros Dorna; Myrthes Anna Barros; Wilma Carvalho Neves Forte
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017

8.  Delivery of subcutaneous immunoglobulin by rapid "push" infusion for primary immunodeficiency patients in Manitoba: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Graham Walter; Chrystyna Kalicinsky; Richard Warrington; Marianne Miguel; Jeannette Reyes; Tamar S Rubin
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.406

9.  Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous IgPro20 at High Infusion Parameters in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency: Findings from the Pump-Assisted Administration Cohorts of the HILO Study.

Authors:  John T Anderson; Vincent R Bonagura; Juthaporn Cowan; Connie Hsu; S Shahzad Mustafa; Niraj C Patel; John M Routes; Panida Sriaroon; Donald C Vinh; Jutta H Hofmann; Michaela Praus; Mikhail A Rojavin
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 8.317

10.  Safety and Tolerability of Manual Push Administration of Subcutaneous IgPro20 at High Infusion Rates in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency: Findings from the Manual Push Administration Cohort of the HILO Study.

Authors:  Juthaporn Cowan; Vincent R Bonagura; Patricia L Lugar; Paul J Maglione; Niraj C Patel; Donald C Vinh; Jutta H Hofmann; Michaela Praus; Mikhail A Rojavin
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 8.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.