OBJECTIVE: To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). METHODS: A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. RESULTS: Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the current state of electronic health record (EHR) use by ophthalmologists, including adoption rate, user satisfaction, functionality, benefits, barriers, and knowledge of meaningful use criteria. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 492 members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO). METHODS: A random sample of 1500 AAO members were selected on the basis of their practice location and solicited to participate in a study of EHR use, practice management, and image management system use. Participants completed the survey via the Internet, phone, or fax. The survey included questions about the adoption of EHRs, available functionality, benefits, barriers, satisfaction, and understanding of meaningful use criteria and health information technology concepts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current adoption rate of EHRs, user satisfaction, benefits and barriers, and availability of EHR functionality. RESULTS: Overall, 32% of the practices surveyed had already implemented an EHR, 15% had implemented an EHR for some of their physicians or were in the process of implementation, and another 31% had plans to do so within 2 years. Among those with an EHR in their practice, 49% were satisfied or extremely satisfied with their system, 42% reported increased or stable overall productivity, 19% reported decreased or stable overall costs, and 55% would recommend an EHR to a fellow ophthalmologist. For those with an electronic image management system, only 15% had all devices integrated, 33% had images directly uploaded into their system, and 12% had electronic association of patient demographics with the image. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of EHRs by ophthalmology practices more than doubled from 2007 to 2011. The satisfaction of ophthalmologists with their EHR and their perception of beneficial effects on productivity and costs were all lower in 2011 than in 2007. Knowledge about meaningful use is high, but the percentage of physicians actually receiving incentive payments is relatively low. Given the importance of imaging in ophthalmology, the shortcomings in current image management systems need to be addressed. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Authors: Michelle R Hribar; David Biermann; Sarah Read-Brown; Leah Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston Chamberlain; Thomas R Yackel; Michael F Chiang Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2017-02-10
Authors: Joshua R Ehrlich; Monica Michelotti; Taylor S Blachley; Kai Zheng; Mick P Couper; Grant M Greenberg; Sharon Kileny; Greta L Branford; David A Hanauer; Jennifer S Weizer Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Leah Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Thomas R Yackel; Michael F Chiang Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2015-11-05
Authors: Michele C Lim; Michael V Boland; Colin A McCannel; Arvind Saini; Michael F Chiang; K David Epley; Flora Lum Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Isaac H Goldstein; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston Chamberlain; Michael F Chiang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Travis K Redd; Sarah Read-Brown; Dongseok Choi; Thomas R Yackel; Daniel C Tu; Michael F Chiang Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Monica Bonetto; Massimo Nicolò; Roberta Gazzarata; Paolo Fraccaro; Raffaella Rosa; Donatella Musetti; Maria Musolino; Carlo E Traverso; Mauro Giacomini Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 3.316