| Literature DB >> 23805777 |
Juanhong Shen, Wenkui Yu, Jialiang Shi, Qiyi Chen, Yimin Hu, Juanjuan Zhang, Tao Gao, Fengchan Xi, Jianfeng Gong, Changsheng He, Ning Li, Jieshou Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac function is important for patients treated by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO), but data about the effect of VV ECMO on the heart in nonneonates is absent. We studied the effect of VV ECMO on cardiac performance, cardiomyocyte and mitochondria in an animal model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23805777 PMCID: PMC3706349 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1749-8090 Impact factor: 1.637
Time course of hemodynamics in the two groups
| HR (beats/min) | ||||||||
| Control group | 136 ± 10.1 | 130 ± 13.7 | 126 ± 10.3 | 123 ± 11.8 | 124 ± 14.5 | 128 ± 14.5 | 131 ± 10.4 | |
| ECMO group | 134 ± 4.9 | 140 ± 12.4 | 130 ± 12.5 | 133 ± 10.4 | 128 ± 10.9 | 124 ± 15.2 | 128 ± 10.4 | |
| MAP (mmHg) | ||||||||
| Control group | 70 ± 6.5 | 72 ± 8.5 | 76 ± 9.3 | 75 ± 8.5 | 70 ± 9.1 | 75 ± 9.9 | 75 ± 9.3 | |
| ECMO group | 67 ± 5.0 | 68 ± 9.5 | 73 ± 9.4 | 71 ± 9.1 | 77 ± 10.6 | 76 ± 8.5 | 73 ± 9.9 | |
| MPAP (mmHg) | ||||||||
| Control group | 17.7 ± 4.0 | 19.2 ± 4.0 | 18.2 ± 3.3 | 19.0 ± 3.6 | 18.8 ± 3.9 | 16.7 ± 4.0 | 18.3 ± 4.0 | |
| ECMO group | 18.5 ± 3.1 | 20.2 ± 4.4 | 19.5 ± 4.5 | 20.2 ± 4.6 | 19.3 ± 4.0 | 19.0 ± 3.1 | 18.7 ± 3.6 | |
| PAOP (mmHg) | ||||||||
| Control group | 12.0 ± 2.1 | 11.7 ± 1.2 | 11.3 ± 1.9 | 11.0 ± 0.9 | 11.2 ± 1.2 | 11.7 ± 1.9 | 11.5 ± 1.2 | |
| ECMO group | 11.2 ± 1.5 | 11.0 ± 1.1 | 11.8 ± 1.2 | 12.0 ± 0.9 | 12.0 ± 1.7 | 11.8 ± 1.6 | 12.0 ± 1.4 | |
Data are shown as mean ± SD. No significance was presented. HR heart rate, MAP mean arterial pressure, MPAP mean pulmonary artery pressure, PAOP pulmonary artery occlusion pressure.
Figure 1Volume of fluid intake of each group. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *P <0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 2Histology of myocardial with H and E staining under optical microscopy (magnification*400). Myocardial structure was normal in either group, but interstitial edema was observed in the ECMO group.
Figure 3Ultrastructure of cardiomyocyte under TEM (magnification*8000). Ultrastructure of cardiomyocyte was normal in the control group, and mildly disorderd of myofilament and dissolved of focal myofilament (pointed by arrow) were observed in the ECMO group.
Figure 4Ultrastructure of mitochondria under TEM (magnification*20000). The mitochondria was normal in the control group; morphological deformations characterized by mitochondrial swollen, decreased density of inner membrane cristae, along with vacuolation(pointed by arrow) were observed in the ECMO group.
Figure 5Enzymatic activities of mitochondrial complex I-V in left ventricular myocardium in each groups of animals. Box plots indicate median, interquartile range, 10th and 90th percentile. *P <0.05 vs. control group. Units are expressed as: complex I-μmoles of NADH oxidized/min/mg protein, complex II-μmoles of DCIP oxidized/min/mg protein, complex III-μmoles of decylubiquinol oxidized/min/mg protein, complex IV- μmoles of cytochrome c oxidized/min/mg protein, complex V -μmoles of NADH oxidized/min/mg protein.