Literature DB >> 23805397

Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy - attenuation of loop formation.

Joseph W Leung1, Anne Thai, Andrew Yen, Gregory Ward, Ovanes Abramyan, Jason Lee, Brandon Smith, Felix Leung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The explanation why water exchange colonoscopy produces a significant reduction of pain during colonoscopy is unknown. A recent editorial recommended use of magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) to elucidate the explanation.
OBJECTIVE: In unselected patients to show that MEI documents less frequent loop formation when water exchange is used.
DESIGN: Observational, performance improvement.
SETTING: Veterans Affairs outpatient endoscopy. PATIENTS: Routine colonoscopy cases.
INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy using air or water exchange method was performed as previously described. The MEI equipment (ScopeGuide, Olympus) with built-in magnetic sensors displays the configuration of the colonoscope inside the patient. During sedated colonoscopy the endoscopist was blinded to the ScopeGuide images which were recorded and subsequently reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Loop formation based on a visual guide provided by Olympus.
RESULTS: There were 41 and 32 cases in the water exchange and air group, respectively. The sigmoid N loop was most common, followed by the sigmoid alpha loop, and exaggeration of scope curvature at the splenic flexure/transverse colon. Of these, 20/32 vs. 9/41 patients (p=0.0007) had sigmoid looping, and 17/32 vs. 9/41 patients (p=0.0007) had sigmoid/splenic looping when the scope tip was in the transverse colon, in the air and water exchange group, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Colonoscopy method was not blinded and non randomized.
CONCLUSION: MEI data objectively demonstrated significantly fewer loops during water exchange colonoscopy, elucidating its mechanism of pain alleviation - attenuation of loop formation. Since MEI feedback enhances cecal intubation by trainees, the role of MEI combined water exchange in speeding up trainee learning curves deserves further evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer screening; magnetic endoscopic imaging; optical colonoscopy; water method

Year:  2012        PMID: 23805397      PMCID: PMC3655371          DOI: 10.4161/jig.23738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2154-1280


  20 in total

1.  A head-to-head comparison of the water vs. air method in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Francisco C Ramirez; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S G Shah; J C Brooker; C B Williams; C Thapar; B P Saunders
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: a pilot study in United States veterans.

Authors:  J W Leung; S Mann; F W Leung
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Interim report of a randomized cross-over study comparing clinical performance of novice trainee endoscopists using conventional air insufflation versus warm water infusion colonoscopy.

Authors:  Catherine Ngo; Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Cecilia Terrado; Christopher Bowlus; Drew Ingram; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  Water exchange may be superior to water immersion for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  The water method significantly enhances patient-centered outcomes in sedated and unsedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  F W Leung; J W Leung; S K Mann; S Friedland; F C Ramirez
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.

Authors:  S G Shah; J C Brooker; C Thapar; C B Williams; B P Saunders
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Geir Hoff; Michael Bretthauer; Stein Dahler; Gert Huppertz-Hauss; Jostein Sauar; Jørn Paulsen; Birgitte Seip; Volker Moritz
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H Y Cheung; C C Chung; S Y Kwok; W W Tsang; M K Li
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Joseph W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Rodelei Siao-Salera; Kanat Ransibrahmanakul; Brian Lim; Hazel Cabrera; Wilhemina Canete; Paul Barredo; Rebeck Gutierrez; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  10 in total

1.  Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hui Jia; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Lina Zhao; Xiangping Wang; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Hui Luo; Zhizheng Ge; Jun Liu; Jianyu Hao; Ping Yao; Yao Zhang; Hongyu Ren; Weizhen Zhou; Yujie Guo; Wei Zhang; Xiaolin Chen; Dayong Sun; Xiaoqiang Yang; Xiaoyu Kang; Na Liu; Zhiguo Liu; Felix Leung; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Water-Assisted Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sergio Cadoni; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

3.  A prospective RCT comparing combined chromoendoscopy with water exchange (CWE) vs water exchange (WE) vs air insufflation (AI) in adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  J W Leung; A W Yen; H Jia; C Opada; A Melnik; J Atkins; C Feller; M D Wilson; F W Leung
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Accuracy of polyp localization at colonoscopy.

Authors:  Sam A O'Connor; David G Hewett; Marcus O Watson; Bradley J Kendall; Luke F Hourigan; Gerald Holtmann
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05-19

5.  Difference in real-time magnetic image analysis of colonic looping patterns between males and females undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jacob Lam; James Wilkinson; Cecilia Brassett; Jonathan Brown
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-08

Review 6.  Is water exchange superior to water immersion for colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhihao Chen; Zhengqi Li; Xinying Yu; Guiqi Wang
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

7.  Accuracy of preoperative tumor localization in large bowel using 3D magnetic endoscopic imaging: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Miroslaw Szura; Artur Pasternak; Rafal Solecki; Maciej Matyja; Antoni Szczepanik; Andrzej Matyja
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cecal intubation rates in different eras of endoscopic technological development.

Authors:  Maciej Matyja; Artur Pasternak; Mirosław Szura; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major; Kazimierz Rembiasz
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?

Authors:  Alisha Chaubal; Vikas Pandey; Ruchir Patel; Prateik Poddar; Aniruddha Phadke; Meghraj Ingle; Prabha Sawant
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-04-30

10.  Systematic review of safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy including studies of radiation-free therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Stavros Nicholas Stavropoulos; David Friedel
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.