Literature DB >> 23804620

Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby.

Kai Lindström1, Topi K Lehtonen.   

Abstract

To date, mate choice studies have mostly focused on establishing which mates are chosen or how the choices are performed. Here, we combined these two approaches by empirically testing how latency to mate is affected by various search costs, variation in mate quality and female quality in the sand goby (Pomatoschistus minutus). Our results show that females adjust their mating behaviour according to the costs and benefits of the choice situation. Specifically, they mated sooner when access to males was delayed and when the presence of other females presented a mate sampling cost. We also found a positive link between size variation among potential mating partners and spawning delay in some (but not all) experimental conditions. By contrast, we did not find the number of available males or the females' own body size ('quality') to affect mating latency. Finally, female mating behaviour varied significantly between years. These findings are notable for demonstrating that (i) mate sampling time is particularly sensitive to costs and, to a lesser degree, to variation among mate candidates, (ii) females' mating behaviour is sensitive to qualitative rather than to quantitative variation in their environment, and (iii) a snapshot view may describe mate sampling behaviour unreliably.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mate choice; mate searching; mating strategy; sampling cost; sexual selection; time constraint

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804620      PMCID: PMC3712446          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Sequential search and the influence of male quality on female mating decisions.

Authors:  D D Wiegmann; K Mukhopadhyay; L A Real
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Context-dependent genetic benefits from mate choice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Mate choice when males are in patches: optimal strategies and good rules of thumb.

Authors:  John M C Hutchinson; Konrad Halupka
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.

Authors:  Alexis S Chaine; Bruce E Lyon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate.

Authors:  Marie-Jeanne Holveck; Katharina Riebel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The biology of speciation.

Authors:  James M Sobel; Grace F Chen; Lorna R Watt; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Measuring female mating preferences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  How is female mate choice affected by male competition?

Authors:  Bob B M Wong; Ulrika Candolin
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-11

10.  Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 2.  Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches.

Authors:  Klaus Reinhold; Holger Schielzeth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers.

Authors:  Naomi L Zweerus; Michiel van Wijk; Isabel M Smallegange; Astrid T Groot
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Effects of salinity on nest-building behaviour in a marine fish.

Authors:  Topi K Lehtonen; Bob B M Wong; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.964

5.  Dark eyes in female sand gobies indicate readiness to spawn.

Authors:  Karin H Olsson; Sandra Johansson; Eva-Lotta Blom; Kai Lindström; Ola Svensson; Helen Nilsson Sköld; Charlotta Kvarnemo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Female mating competition alters female mating preferences in common gobies.

Authors:  Katja Heubel
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Spatiotemporal and gender-specific parasitism in two species of gobiid fish.

Authors:  Anssi Karvonen; Kai Lindström
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Effects of temperature on mating behaviour and mating success: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natalie Pilakouta; Anaїs Baillet
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Females sample more males at high nesting densities, but ultimately obtain less attractive mates.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Chelsea Stehle; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.