Literature DB >> 23804616

Social learning of predators in the dark: understanding the role of visual, chemical and mechanical information.

R P Manassa1, M I McCormick, D P Chivers, M C O Ferrari.   

Abstract

The ability of prey to observe and learn to recognize potential predators from the behaviour of nearby individuals can dramatically increase survival and, not surprisingly, is widespread across animal taxa. A range of sensory modalities are available for this learning, with visual and chemical cues being well-established modes of transmission in aquatic systems. The use of other sensory cues in mediating social learning in fishes, including mechano-sensory cues, remains unexplored. Here, we examine the role of different sensory cues in social learning of predator recognition, using juvenile damselfish (Amphiprion percula). Specifically, we show that a predator-naive observer can socially learn to recognize a novel predator when paired with a predator-experienced conspecific in total darkness. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that when threatened, individuals release chemical cues (known as disturbance cues) into the water. These cues induce an anti-predator response in nearby individuals; however, they do not facilitate learnt recognition of the predator. As such, another sensory modality, probably mechano-sensory in origin, is responsible for information transfer in the dark. This study highlights the diversity of sensory cues used by coral reef fishes in a social learning context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coral reef fishes; disturbance cues; predator recognition; social learning; visual cues

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804616      PMCID: PMC3712441          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by slimy sculpins (Cottus cognatus): responses to alarm, disturbance, and predator cues.

Authors:  P J Bryer; R S Mirza; D P Chivers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Homeward sound.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Mark Meekan; John Montgomery; Rob McCauley; Andrew Jeffs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ocean acidification erodes crucial auditory behaviour in a marine fish.

Authors:  Stephen D Simpson; Philip L Munday; Matthew L Wittenrich; Rachel Manassa; Danielle L Dixson; Monica Gagliano; Hong Y Yan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Social learning improves survivorship at a life-history transition.

Authors:  R P Manassa; M I McCormick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Tracking wakes: the nocturnal predatory strategy of piscivorous catfish.

Authors:  K Pohlmann; F W Grasso; T Breithaupt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Identification of a disturbance signal in larval red-legged frogs, Rana aurora.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Disturbance chemical cues determine changes in spatial occupation by the convict cichlid Archocentrus nigrofasciatus.

Authors:  L C Jordão
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Early warning in the predation sequence: A disturbance pheromone in Iowa darters (Etheostoma exile).

Authors:  B D Wisenden; D P Chivers; R J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Degraded environments alter prey risk assessment.

Authors:  Oona M Lönnstedt; Mark I McCormick; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The effect of turbidity on recognition and generalization of predators and non-predators in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Douglas P Chivers; Fawaz Al-Batati; Grant E Brown; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  8 in total

1.  Trust thy neighbour in times of trouble: background risk alters how tadpoles release and respond to disturbance cues.

Authors:  Kevin R Bairos-Novak; Matthew D Mitchell; Adam L Crane; Douglas P Chivers; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Long-term exposure to elevated carbon dioxide does not alter activity levels of a coral reef fish in response to predator chemical cues.

Authors:  Josefin Sundin; Mirjam Amcoff; Fernando Mateos-González; Graham D Raby; Fredrik Jutfelt; Timothy D Clark
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Algae associated with coral degradation affects risk assessment in coral reef fishes.

Authors:  Mark I McCormick; Randall P Barry; Bridie J M Allan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Learning from the mistakes of others: How female elk (Cervus elaphus) adjust behaviour with age to avoid hunters.

Authors:  Henrik Thurfjell; Simone Ciuti; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Boat noise impacts risk assessment in a coral reef fish but effects depend on engine type.

Authors:  Mark I McCormick; Bridie J M Allan; Harry Harding; Stephen D Simpson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues.

Authors:  Jack A Goldman; Laurence E A Feyten; Indar W Ramnarine; Grant E Brown
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Plasticity of Escape Responses: Prior Predator Experience Enhances Escape Performance in a Coral Reef Fish.

Authors:  Ryan A Ramasamy; Bridie J M Allan; Mark I McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Risk assessment and predator learning in a changing world: understanding the impacts of coral reef degradation.

Authors:  Douglas P Chivers; Mark I McCormick; Bridie J M Allan; Maud C O Ferrari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.