Literature DB >> 23804558

Comparison of different cardiac risk scores for coronary artery disease in symptomatic women: do female-specific risk factors matter?

Anouk A E M Rademaker1, Ibrahim Danad1, Jan G J Groothuis1, Martijn W Heymans1, Constantin B Marcu1, Paul Knaapen1, Yolande E A Appelman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death in women and there is a need for more accurate risk assessment scores. The aims of our study were to compare the accuracy of several widely used cardiac risk assessment scores in predicting the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in symptomatic women and to explore which female-specific risk factors were independent predictors of obstructive CAD on CTCA and whether adding these risk factors to pre-test probability scores would improve their predictive value. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data were obtained from a cohort of 228 consecutively included symptomatic women undergoing evaluation for CAD and referred for CTCA. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% luminal stenosis on CTCA. Pre-test probability for CAD was calculated according to the Diamond and Forrester score, New score, Duke clinical score, and an updated Diamond and Forrester score. Female-specific factors were obtained by a written questionnaire. Pre-test probability scores were compared with ROC analysis and showed that only the New score and the updated Diamond and Forrester score were significant predictive scores for obstructive CAD on CTCA (area under the curve, AUC, 0.67, p < 0.01; AUC 0.61, p = 0.04, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and oestrogen status were independent predictors of obstructive CAD when adjusted for the pre-test probability scores. The updated Diamond and Forrester score was used for net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis, since the New score already accounts for oestrogen status. Adding GDM and oestrogen status to the updated Diamond and Forrester score resulted in a significant NRI (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variability in prediction of obstructive CAD using different pre-test probability risk scores in symptomatic women. Logistic regression analysis revealed that oestrogen status and GDM were independently associated with the occurrence of obstructive stenosis on CTCA. The predictive ability of cardiac pre-test probability scores improved significantly with the addition of oestrogen status and GDM. © The European Society of Cardiology 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; female-specific risk factors; pre-test probability scores

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804558     DOI: 10.1177/2047487313494571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  6 in total

1.  Some highlights of a 47 year career in research.

Authors:  Ferid Murad
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  [Diamond-Forrester and cardiac CT : Is there a need to redefine the pretest probability of coronary artery disease?].

Authors:  A Schuhbäck; J Kolwelter; S Achenbach
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Diagnostic models of the pre-test probability of stable coronary artery disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ting He; Xing Liu; Nana Xu; Ying Li; Qiaoyu Wu; Meilin Liu; Hong Yuan
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 4.  Association of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with subclinical atherosclerosis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Wei Li; Si-Yi He; Peng Liu; Lin Luo; Liang Zhao; Ying-Bin Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Impact of sex-specific differences in calculating the pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients: a coronary computed tomographic angiography study.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Yujie Liu; Hong Zhang; Jia Zhou
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  Discrimination capability of pretest probability of stable coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis suggesting how to improve validation procedures.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Mincarone; Antonella Bodini; Maria Rosaria Tumolo; Federico Vozzi; Silvia Rocchiccioli; Gualtiero Pelosi; Chiara Caselli; Saverio Sabina; Carlo Giacomo Leo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.