Literature DB >> 23804529

Postconditioning in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis.

Lei Wang1, Jingping Wang, Huiyu Xu, Bao Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of present analysis was to evaluate the effect of postconditioning in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
BACKGROUND: Although postconditioning in pPCI has shown potential favorable effects on reperfusion injury, recent trials have yielded divergent results.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were identified using relevant databases published up to August 15, 2012. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated using meta-analysis through fixed- or random-effects models. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.17 and Stata 12.0.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies providing myocardial biomarkers, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or infarct size evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in a total of 725 ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients were identified. Compared with usual care, postconditioning significantly reduced myocardial injury biomarkers (SMD = -0.61; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): [-0.98, -0.23]; P = 0.001; I(2) = 78%). Univariate meta-regression analysis suggested potential source of heterogeneity were the type of biomarkers and the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (I(2) reg = 44.84% and 67.24%, respectively; R(2) = 91.53% and 49.46%, respectively). Secondary analysis showed statistical significant improvement of LVEF with postconditioning (WMD = 3.22%; 95%CI: [0.88%, 5.57%]; P = 0.007; I(2) = 60%) relative to usual care. The effect diminished during medium (<6 months) and long terms (≥6 months) (P = 0.86 and 0.15, respectively). There was no significant decrease in infarct size among patients treated with postconditioning compared to usual care (SMD = 0.20; 95%CI: [-0.03, 0.43]; P = 0.08; I(2) = 46%).
CONCLUSION: In STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, postconditioning is associated with significant lower level of myocardial injury biomarkers and a statistical significant improvement of LVEF relative to usual care. However, this adjunctive therapy may fails to reduce infarct size evaluated by CMR.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardioprotection; myocardial infarction; reperfusion injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804529     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Clinical effect of postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xian-qing Hu; Jian Cheng; Biao Tang; Zhong-heng Zhang; Ke Huang; Yi-ping Yang; Yan-yan Mao; Ming Zhong; Shen-wen Fu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 2.  Mechanical post-conditioning in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Marouane Boukhris; Radhouane Bousselmi; Salvatore Davide Tomasello; Zied Ibn Elhadj; Salvatore Azzarelli; Francesco Marzà; Alfredo R Galassi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Effect of ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A single-center cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Priyam Mukherjee; Mayank Jain
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.