Literature DB >> 23804436

Less morbidity after introduction of a new departmental policy for patients who undergo open distal pancreatectomy.

Rintaro Yui1, Sohei Satoi, Hideyoshi Toyokawa, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Tomohisa Yamamoto, Satoshi Hirooka, So Yamaki, Hironori Ryota, Taku Michiura, Kentaro Inoue, Yoichi Matsui, A-Hon Kwon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare morbidity and mortality before and after introduction of a new departmental policy for patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy.
METHODS: We have introduced the use of an ultrasonically-activated device in distal pancreatectomy, an "early removal of drains" policy and perioperative management using a clinical pathway since May 2006. Group A consisted of 52 consecutive patients from 2000 to February 2006. Group B consisted of 57 consecutive patients from May 2006 to 2010.
RESULTS: Although there was no difference in the fluid collection rate within 30 postoperative days (Group A, 44% vs. Group B, 35%), the rates of intra-abdominal abscess (A, 19% vs. B, 4%) and grade 3/4 of the Clavien classification (A, 23% vs. B, 9%) in Group B were significantly lower than in Group A (P < 0.05). Time of drain removal (median 3 days vs. 8 days) and length of in-hospital stay (median 8 days vs. 17 days) in Group B were significantly shorter than in Group A (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The implementation of new departmental guidelines for distal pancreatectomy was closely associated with a low frequency of intra-abdominal abscess and grade 3/4 Clavien score, resulting in a shorter in-hospital stay.
© 2013 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien-Dindo classification; Distal pancreatectomy; Intra-abdominal abscess; Pancreatic fistula

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23804436     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  6 in total

1.  Robotic distal pancreatectomy with selective closure of pancreatic duct: surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Luca Moraldi; Benedetta Pesi; Lapo Bencini; Marco Farsi; Mario Annecchiarico; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-11-14

2.  Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Filip Čečka; Martin Loveček; Bohumil Jon; Pavel Skalický; Zdeněk Šubrt; Čestmír Neoral; Alexander Ferko
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Treating Porcine Abscesses with Histotripsy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Thomas J Matula; Yak-Nam Wang; Tatiana Khokhlova; Daniel F Leotta; John Kucewicz; Andrew A Brayman; Matthew Bruce; Adam D Maxwell; Brian E MacConaghy; Gilles Thomas; Valery P Chernikov; Sergey V Buravkov; Vera A Khokhlova; Keith Richmond; Keith Chan; Wayne Monsky
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Bin Ji; Wen-Tao Zhu; Qiang Wei; Xiao-Xiao Wang; Hai-Bin Wang; Qiang-Pu Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Ultrasonic Dissection versus Conventional Dissection for Pancreatic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Haiming Lei; Dong Xu; Xinghua Shi; Koulan Han
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Clinical impact of developing better practices at the institutional level on surgical outcomes after distal pancreatectomy in 1515 patients: Domestic audit of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Ippei Matsumoto; Hideyuki Yoshitomi; Ryosuke Amano; Munenori Tahara; Yoshiaki Murakami; Hidehito Arimitsu; Seiko Hirono; Masayuki Sho; Hironori Ryota; Masayuki Ohtsuka; Michiaki Unno; Yoshifumi Takeyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-03-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.