PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To reduce workplace stress by developing a brief psychological skills training for nurses and to evaluate program feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in decreasing burnout and stress. DESIGN: Intervention development and evaluation. SETTING: Outpatient chemotherapy unit at a comprehensive cancer center. SAMPLE: 26 infusion nurses and oncology social workers. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with nurses. Results informed the development and evaluation of training for nurses. Participants completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Perceived Stress Scale post-training. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Burnout and stress. FINDINGS: Focus groups indicated strong commitment among nurses to psychosocial care and supported the idea that relationships with patients and families were sources of reward and stress. Stressors included factors that interfered with psychosocial care such as difficult family dynamics, patient behaviors and end-of-life care issues. Psychological skills training was developed to address these stressors. Evaluations suggested that the program was feasible and acceptable to nurses. At two months, participants showed reductions in emotional exhaustion (p = 0.02) and stress (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological skills training for managing difficult encounters showed feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefit in reducing emotional exhaustion and stress. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Brief training that targets sources of clinical stress may be useful for nurses in outpatient chemotherapy units. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: Specific stressors in relationships with patients and families present challenges to nurses' therapeutic use of self. Targeted psychological skills training may help nurses problem-solve difficult encounters while taking care of themselves. System-level strategies are needed to support and promote training participation.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To reduce workplace stress by developing a brief psychological skills training for nurses and to evaluate program feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in decreasing burnout and stress. DESIGN: Intervention development and evaluation. SETTING:Outpatient chemotherapy unit at a comprehensive cancer center. SAMPLE: 26 infusion nurses and oncology social workers. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with nurses. Results informed the development and evaluation of training for nurses. Participants completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Perceived Stress Scale post-training. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Burnout and stress. FINDINGS: Focus groups indicated strong commitment among nurses to psychosocial care and supported the idea that relationships with patients and families were sources of reward and stress. Stressors included factors that interfered with psychosocial care such as difficult family dynamics, patient behaviors and end-of-life care issues. Psychological skills training was developed to address these stressors. Evaluations suggested that the program was feasible and acceptable to nurses. At two months, participants showed reductions in emotional exhaustion (p = 0.02) and stress (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological skills training for managing difficult encounters showed feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefit in reducing emotional exhaustion and stress. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Brief training that targets sources of clinical stress may be useful for nurses in outpatient chemotherapy units. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: Specific stressors in relationships with patients and families present challenges to nurses' therapeutic use of self. Targeted psychological skills training may help nurses problem-solve difficult encounters while taking care of themselves. System-level strategies are needed to support and promote training participation.
Authors: Talia I Zaider; Smita C Banerjee; Ruth Manna; Nessa Coyle; Cassandra Pehrson; Stacey Hammonds; Carol A Krueger; Carma L Bylund Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Smita C Banerjee; Ruth Manna; Nessa Coyle; Stacey Penn; Tess E Gallegos; Talia Zaider; Carol A Krueger; Philip A Bialer; Carma L Bylund; Patricia A Parker Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: John R Scheel; Yamile Molina; Gloria Coronado; Sonia Bishop; Sarah Doty; Ricardo Jimenez; Beti Thompson; Constance D Lehman; Shirley A A Beresford Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Elyse R Park; Jan E Mutchler; Giselle Perez; Roberta E Goldman; Halsey Niles; Vivian Haime; Cheyenne Fox Tree-McGrath; Mai See Yang; Daniel Woolridge; July Suarez; Karen Donelan; William F Pirl Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Patricia Gray; Sipho Senabe; Nisha Naicker; Spo Kgalamono; Annalee Yassi; Jerry M Spiegel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390