Literature DB >> 23802819

Critical care nurses' perception of time spent at rapid responses.

Janice Wang1, Viera Lakticova, Ann Marie McCabe, Bernadette Amitrano, Lisa Rosen, Rubin I Cohen.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Critical care nurses are an integral part of rapid response (RR) teams. The length of time they spend away from an intensive care unit (ICU) to attend RRs and how ICU nurses perceive the time away from the ICU has not been previously evaluated.
OBJECTIVES: To determine: (1) the time an ICU nurse spends at RRs; (2) ICU nurses' view of nursing absence; and (3) RR characteristics associated with longer nursing time.
METHODS: A prospective analysis of RRs in one 500-bed adult academic medical center over 1 year. Nurses' perception was assessed through surveys and semistructured interviews.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 536 RRs. An ICU nurse was present for 20 minutes or less in 54% of the RRs, 21-40 minutes in 26%, 41-60 minutes in 11%, and more than 60 minutes in 9% of RRs. Compared with nursing time required in RRs for neurologic instability (median [Q1 first quartile {25th percentile}, Q3 third quartile {75th percentile}] = 15.0 [10.0, 27.0] min), nursing time was longer in RRs for hemodynamic instability (30.0 [15.0, 45.0] min) and respiratory failure (25.0 [12.0, 45.0] min; P < 0.0001). Of the 85 nurses surveyed, 47% considered 41-60 minutes as a substantial amount of time at RRs; 99% perceived ICU workload as busier when a nurse attended RRs, and 87% believed ICU care was compromised, defined as reduction in the quality of care.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of one midsized academic medical center, about half of critical care nurse involvement in RRs takes them away from their ICU patients for less than 20 minutes. Nevertheless, nurses felt that ICU care was compromised when an ICU nurse responded to an RR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23802819     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201211-092OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  2 in total

1.  What's new with rapid response systems?

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Anne Lippert; Michael DeVita; Ken Hillman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Echo: A Large Display Interactive Visualization of ICU Data for Effective Care HandOffs.

Authors:  Manu Mathew Thomas; Thomas Kannampallil; Joanna Abraham; G Elisabeta Marai
Journal:  2017 IEEE Workshop Vis Anal Healthc VAHC (2017)       Date:  2017-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.