Literature DB >> 23802799

Stable isotope tracer to determine uptake and efflux dynamics of ZnO Nano- and bulk particles and dissolved Zn to an estuarine snail.

Farhan R Khan1, Adam Laycock, Agnieszka Dybowska, Fiona Larner, Brian D Smith, Philip S Rainbow, Samuel N Luoma, Mark Rehkämper, Eugenia Valsami-Jones.   

Abstract

Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are among the most commercialized engineered nanomaterials. Their biological impact in aquatic organisms has been associated with dissolution, but there is also evidence of nanospecific effects. In this study the waterborne uptake and efflux kinetics of isotopically labeled (68)ZnO NPs (7.8 ± 1.2 nm), in comparison to aqueous (68)Zn and (68)ZnO bulk particles (up to 2 μm), were determined for the estuarine snail Peringia ulvae following a 7 d exposure (nominally 20 μg (68)Zn L(-1)) and 28 d depuration. Detection of the (68)Zn label was achieved by high precision multiple-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICP-MS). Previous characterization in artificial estuarine water revealed that the NPs underwent initial aggregation and solubilized up to 60% within 1-2 days. Bulk and aqueous forms were significantly more bioavailable than (68)ZnO NPs (p < 0.05), but after correcting for dissolution, aqueous (0.074 L(-1) g(-1) d(-1)) and NP (0.070 L(-1) g(-1) d(-1)) uptake rate constants were highly comparable. The rate constant of loss for (68)Zn aqueous (0.012 ± 0.005 d(-1)) and (68)ZnO NPs (0.012 ± 0.007 d(-1)) were identical. These results strongly suggest that in this exposure scenario the bioaccumulation of Zn from ZnO NPs is primarily dependent upon solubility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23802799     DOI: 10.1021/es4011465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

Review 1.  Analytical approaches to support current understanding of exposure, uptake and distributions of engineered nanoparticles by aquatic and terrestrial organisms.

Authors:  Carolin Schultz; Kate Powell; Alison Crossley; Kerstin Jurkschat; Peter Kille; A John Morgan; Daniel Read; William Tyne; Elma Lahive; Claus Svendsen; David J Spurgeon
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Considerations of Environmentally Relevant Test Conditions for Improved Evaluation of Ecological Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Patricia A Holden; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Fred Klaessig; Ronald F Turco; Monika Mortimer; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; David Avery; Damià Barceló; Renata Behra; Yoram Cohen; Laurence Deydier-Stephan; P Lee Ferguson; Teresa F Fernandes; Barbara Herr Harthorn; W Matthew Henderson; Robert A Hoke; Danail Hristozov; John M Johnston; Agnes B Kane; Larry Kapustka; Arturo A Keller; Hunter S Lenihan; Wess Lovell; Catherine J Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Elijah J Petersen; Edward R Salinas; Martin Scheringer; Monita Sharma; David E Speed; Yasir Sultan; Paul Westerhoff; Jason C White; Mark R Wiesner; Eva M Wong; Baoshan Xing; Meghan Steele Horan; Hilary A Godwin; André E Nel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Behavior and Potential Impacts of Metal-Based Engineered Nanoparticles in Aquatic Environments.

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Wen Zhang; Haiping Gao; Yang Li; Xin Tong; Kungang Li; Xiaoshan Zhu; Yixiang Wang; Yongsheng Chen
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  ZnO Nanomaterials and Ionic Zn Partition within Wastewater Sludge Investigated by Isotopic Labeling.

Authors:  Miguel A Gomez-Gonzalez; Mark Rehkämper; Zexiang Han; Mary P Ryan; Adam Laycock; Alexandra E Porter
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 5.  Insights on the Dynamics and Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Environmental Matrices.

Authors:  T Devasena; B Iffath; R Renjith Kumar; Natarajan Muninathan; Kuppusamy Baskaran; T Srinivasan; Shani T John
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.724

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.