Literature DB >> 23802086

Naturally circulating dendritic cells to vaccinate cancer patients.

Kalijn F Bol1, Jurjen Tel, I Jolanda M de Vries, Carl G Figdor.   

Abstract

Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy is a promising strategy against cancer that appears to be feasible, safe and to induce potent tumor-specific immune responses. The use of naturally circulating dendritic cells (DCs), rather than cultured monocyte-derived DCs, might constitute the next logical step to translate anticancer immune responses into long-lasting clinical benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer immunotherapy; dendritic-cell targeting; dendritic-cell vaccination; myeloid dendritic cells; plasmacytoid dendritic cells

Year:  2013        PMID: 23802086      PMCID: PMC3661171          DOI: 10.4161/onci.23431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Monocyte- and CD34-Derived Dendritic Cells

How human CD34+ cell progenitors or monocytes can be differentiated in vitro into dendritic cells (DCs) by the combined administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) was first described in 1994. This boosted the enthusiasm for the use of DC vaccination in humans, resulting in the first clinical studies in which monocyte-derived DCs (moDC) were employed as a cellular anticancer vaccine. Since then, numerous—usually small—clinical trials have been performed to demonstrate the efficacy of this approach. After more than one decade, we nowadays know that moDCs can induce anticancer immune responses in a significant number of patients, in particular when both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are activated, as recently shown by our DC vaccination studies. Nevertheless, only a limited number of clinical responses have been observed, yet expectations are high as these responses often are long-lasting. It remains unclear whether DCs differentiated ex vivo from monocytes or CD34+ cell progenitors are optimal for the induction of potent immune responses. The extensive culture period and the agents that are required to differentiate them into DCs might negatively affect immune functions, in particular their capacity to migrate toward T-cell areas in lymph nodes. Therefore, the interest in naturally circulating DCs has risen, despite the fact that these cells are relatively scarce, constituting only about 0.2–1.5% of peripheral blood leukocytes.

Natural Dendritic-Cell Subsets

Two major populations of naturally circulating DCs can be distinguished in the peripheral blood of humans: myeloid (CD1c+) DCs (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). These DC subtypes differ in function, localization, and phenotype. On one hand, mDCs mainly migrate to, or reside in, the marginal zone of lymph nodes (a primary entry point for blood-borne antigens) and are thought to recognize and respond to bacterial and fungal antigens. On the other hand, pDCs mainly reside in the T-cell areas of lymph nodes and seem to be specialized for the recognition of viral antigens. Interestingly, we have recently observed that pDCs can take up small but significant amounts of antigens, efficiently cross-present them, and even exhibit a tumoricidal natural killer (NK) cell-like behavior. Taken together, these findings suggest that naturally circulating DCs such as pDCs may also be well suited for vaccination studies.

Clinical Studies with Natural Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells

We have embarked on exploiting pDCs that naturally circulate in the peripheral blood for cancer immunotherapy. Although it is well known that inactive intratumoral pDCs are associated with tumor progression, activated, interferon α (IFNα)-producing pDCs can stimulate NK cells and induce antigen-specific T- and B-cell responses. Our finding that vaccines commonly used for the prophylaxis of infectious diseases could simply be used as adjuvants for stimulating pDCs to secrete significant amounts of IFNα has certainly expedited the use of naturally circulating DCs in the clinic. About three years ago, we initiated the first human study exploiting pDCs to treat advanced (Stage IV) melanoma patients. Designed as a safety study, we treated 15 patients in three cohorts with dose escalating pDC-based vaccines, ranging from 0.3 to 3 million cells per injection. As the number of cells was low and no data existed on their migratory capacity in vivo, we decided to perform intranodal injections, in order to maximize the possibility to elicit an immune response. Although the trial was not designed to measure clinical efficacy, we obtained some surprising clinical results. We observed a consistent improvement in clinical responses when these freshly isolated, naturally circulating DCs were compared with conventional moDCs. Indeed, 7 out of 15 Stage IV melanoma patients are still alive two years after the initiation of treatment. Interestingly, we obtained similar results even with a 10-fold lower dose of cells, demonstrating the potency of natural pDCs. Interestingly, Celli et al. have recently demonstrated that as few as one hundred DCs are needed to elicit a T-cell response, suggesting that perhaps only small amounts of DCs are needed for the induction of antitumor responses in patients.

Conclusions

Altogether, our recent findings indicate that it is worthwhile to further explore the potential of pDCs and other naturally circulating DCs for cancer immunotherapy. It will be interesting to see if also other DC subsets, such as mDCs are equally, or even more, effective than pDCs in this setting. Another strategy of exploiting these cells for immunotherapy would be to target specific naturally circulating DC subsets in vivo. This would prevent isolation, laborious culturing, and antigen loading ex vivo (Fig. 1). Early studies have demonstrated that antigen-antibody conjugates can target DCs in vivo, resulting in efficient antigen presentation. However, if antibody-antigen conjugates are not accompanied by adjuvants, tolerance rather than immune responses might be induced. Therefore, several investigators have embarked on the development of nanoparticles that are coated with antibodies to target naturally circulating DCs and loaded with both antigens and adjuvant(s). Preliminary clinical studies based on the targeting of naturally circulating DCs are underway.

Figure 1. Induction of tumor antigen-specific T cells with naturally circulating dendritic cells. Exploiting naturally circulating dendritic cells (DCs) can either be performed by isolating plasmacytoid DCs or myeloid DCs and stimulating them ex vivo with adjuvant(s) and antigens or by targeting them in vivo, by means of nanoparticles that carry antigens and adjuvant(s) and are coated with antibodies against DC-specific cell surface receptors. Within lymph nodes, DCs present antigens to T cells and initiate immune responses. Activated tumor antigen-specific T cells proliferate and migrate out of the lymph node toward the tumor site (where the antigen is located). CD4, CD4+ T helper cell; CD8, CD8+ cytotoxic T cell; imDC, immature dendritic cell; mDC, myeloid dendritic cell; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cell; NK, natural killer cell.

Figure 1. Induction of tumor antigen-specific T cells with naturally circulating dendritic cells. Exploiting naturally circulating dendritic cells (DCs) can either be performed by isolating plasmacytoid DCs or myeloid DCs and stimulating them ex vivo with adjuvant(s) and antigens or by targeting them in vivo, by means of nanoparticles that carry antigens and adjuvant(s) and are coated with antibodies against DC-specific cell surface receptors. Within lymph nodes, DCs present antigens to T cells and initiate immune responses. Activated tumor antigen-specific T cells proliferate and migrate out of the lymph node toward the tumor site (where the antigen is located). CD4, CD4+ T helper cell; CD8, CD8+ cytotoxic T cell; imDC, immature dendritic cell; mDC, myeloid dendritic cell; pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cell; NK, natural killer cell.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Dendritic cell subsets and lineages, and their functions in innate and adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Y J Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Targeted delivery of TLR ligands to human and mouse dendritic cells strongly enhances adjuvanticity.

Authors:  Paul J Tacken; Ingrid S Zeelenberg; Luis J Cruz; Maaike A van Hout-Kuijer; Gerline van de Glind; Remco G Fokkink; Annechien J A Lambeck; Carl G Figdor
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Targeted antigen delivery and activation of dendritic cells in vivo: steps towards cost effective vaccines.

Authors:  Paul J Tacken; Carl G Figdor
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 4.  Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells.

Authors:  Karolina Palucka; Jacques Banchereau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  How many dendritic cells are required to initiate a T-cell response?

Authors:  Susanna Celli; Mark Day; Andreas J Müller; Carmen Molina-Paris; Grant Lythe; Philippe Bousso
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prophylactic vaccines mimic synthetic CpG oligonucleotides in their ability to modulate immune responses.

Authors:  I Jolanda M de Vries; Jurjen Tel; Daniel Benitez-Ribas; Ruurd Torensma; Carl G Figdor
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.407

7.  Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells are equipped with antigen-presenting and tumoricidal capacities.

Authors:  Jurjen Tel; Evelien L Smits; Sébastien Anguille; Rubin N Joshi; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Human plasmacytoid dendritic cells efficiently cross-present exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells despite lower Ag uptake than myeloid dendritic cell subsets.

Authors:  Jurjen Tel; Gerty Schreibelt; Simone P Sittig; Till S M Mathan; Sonja I Buschow; Luis J Cruz; Annechien J A Lambeck; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Natural human plasmacytoid dendritic cells induce antigen-specific T-cell responses in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Jurjen Tel; Erik H J G Aarntzen; Tetsuro Baba; Gerty Schreibelt; Barbara M Schulte; Daniel Benitez-Ribas; Otto C Boerman; Sandra Croockewit; Wim J G Oyen; Michelle van Rossum; Gregor Winkels; Pierre G Coulie; Cornelis J A Punt; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Targeting CD4(+) T-helper cells improves the induction of antitumor responses in dendritic cell-based vaccination.

Authors:  Erik H J G Aarntzen; I Jolanda M De Vries; W Joost Lesterhuis; Danita Schuurhuis; Joannes F M Jacobs; Kalijn Bol; Gerty Schreibelt; Roel Mus; Johannes H W De Wilt; John B A G Haanen; Dirk Schadendorf; Alexandra Croockewit; Willeke A M Blokx; Michelle M Van Rossum; William W Kwok; Gosse J Adema; Cornelis J A Punt; Carl G Figdor
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 12.701

  10 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Trial watch: Dendritic cell-based anticancer therapy.

Authors:  Norma Bloy; Jonathan Pol; Fernando Aranda; Alexander Eggermont; Isabelle Cremer; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jitka Fučíková; Jérôme Galon; Eric Tartour; Radek Spisek; Madhav V Dhodapkar; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 2.  Past, present and future targets for immunotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Carlton L Schwab; Diana P English; Dana M Roque; Monica Pasternak; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 3.  Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Erika Vacchelli; José-Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Aitziber Buqué; Laura Senovilla; Elisa Elena Baracco; Norma Bloy; Francesca Castoldi; Jean-Pierre Abastado; Patrizia Agostinis; Ron N Apte; Fernando Aranda; Maha Ayyoub; Philipp Beckhove; Jean-Yves Blay; Laura Bracci; Anne Caignard; Chiara Castelli; Federica Cavallo; Estaban Celis; Vincenzo Cerundolo; Aled Clayton; Mario P Colombo; Lisa Coussens; Madhav V Dhodapkar; Alexander M Eggermont; Douglas T Fearon; Wolf H Fridman; Jitka Fučíková; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Jérôme Galon; Abhishek Garg; François Ghiringhelli; Giuseppe Giaccone; Eli Gilboa; Sacha Gnjatic; Axel Hoos; Anne Hosmalin; Dirk Jäger; Pawel Kalinski; Klas Kärre; Oliver Kepp; Rolf Kiessling; John M Kirkwood; Eva Klein; Alexander Knuth; Claire E Lewis; Roland Liblau; Michael T Lotze; Enrico Lugli; Jean-Pierre Mach; Fabrizio Mattei; Domenico Mavilio; Ignacio Melero; Cornelis J Melief; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Lorenzo Moretta; Adekunke Odunsi; Hideho Okada; Anna Karolina Palucka; Marcus E Peter; Kenneth J Pienta; Angel Porgador; George C Prendergast; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Nicholas P Restifo; Naiyer Rizvi; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Hans Schreiber; Barbara Seliger; Hiroshi Shiku; Bruno Silva-Santos; Mark J Smyth; Daniel E Speiser; Radek Spisek; Pramod K Srivastava; James E Talmadge; Eric Tartour; Sjoerd H Van Der Burg; Benoît J Van Den Eynde; Richard Vile; Hermann Wagner; Jeffrey S Weber; Theresa L Whiteside; Jedd D Wolchok; Laurence Zitvogel; Weiping Zou; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-12-30

4.  Immune response, safety, and survival and quality of life outcomes for advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with dendritic cell vaccine and cytokine-induced killer cell therapy.

Authors:  Hui Zhu; Xuejing Yang; Jiali Li; Yanjie Ren; Tianyu Zhang; Chunze Zhang; Jintai Zhang; Jing Li; Yan Pang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Intranodal vaccination with mRNA-optimized dendritic cells in metastatic melanoma patients.

Authors:  Kalijn F Bol; Carl G Figdor; Erik Hjg Aarntzen; Marieke Eb Welzen; Michelle M van Rossum; Willeke Am Blokx; Mandy Wmm van de Rakt; Nicole M Scharenborg; Annemiek J de Boer; Jeanette M Pots; Michel Am Olde Nordkamp; Tom Gm van Oorschot; Roel Dm Mus; Sandra Aj Croockewit; Joannes Fm Jacobs; Gerold Schuler; Bart Neyns; Jonathan M Austyn; Cornelis Ja Punt; Gerty Schreibelt; I Jolanda M de Vries
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 6.  Pros and Cons of Antigen-Presenting Cell Targeted Tumor Vaccines.

Authors:  Cleo Goyvaerts; Karine Breckpot
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 7.  Trial watch: Dendritic cell-based interventions for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Ilio Vitale; Alexander Eggermont; Wolf Hervé Fridman; Jitka Fučíková; Isabelle Cremer; Jérôme Galon; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 8.  Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy for myeloid leukemias.

Authors:  Christian M Schürch; Carsten Riether; Adrian F Ochsenbein
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Preclinical exploration of combining plasmacytoid and myeloid dendritic cell vaccination with BRAF inhibition.

Authors:  Jurjen Tel; Rutger Koornstra; Nienke de Haas; Vincent van Deutekom; Harm Westdorp; Steve Boudewijns; Nielka van Erp; Stefania Di Blasio; Winald Gerritsen; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries; Stanleyson V Hato
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Ipilimumab administered to metastatic melanoma patients who progressed after dendritic cell vaccination.

Authors:  Steve Boudewijns; Rutger H T Koornstra; Harm Westdorp; Gerty Schreibelt; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Marnix H Geukes Foppen; John B Haanen; I Jolanda M de Vries; Carl G Figdor; Kalijn F Bol; Winald R Gerritsen
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 8.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.