| Literature DB >> 23802024 |
Teresa Sierpinska1, Joanna Kuc, Maria Golebiewska.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Advanced tooth wear often results in lost vertical dimension and impacts facial aesthetics. Complex restorative treatment can replace the lost tooth structure and improve functional occlusal and facial skeleton parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Cephalometric analysis; EMG; T-Scan.; occlusal vertical dimension; rehabilitation; tooth wear
Year: 2013 PMID: 23802024 PMCID: PMC3681002 DOI: 10.2174/1874210601307010055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Dent J ISSN: 1874-2106
The Comparison of Linear and Angular Parameters Describing Morphological Features of the Facial Skeleton before and after Treatment. Mean Values ± SD were given
| Feature | Before Treatment n=50 | After Treatment n=50 | P< |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length of anterior base | 73.3 ± 3.9 | 73.4±3.9 | |
| Length of maxilla | 57.5 ± 3.4 | 57.7± 3.6 | |
| Length of mandible | 79.5 ± 5.2 | 79.5± 4.9 | |
| Distance +1 from NA | 3.5 ± 3.5 | 3.9±3.6 | |
| Distance -1 from NB | 3.0 ± 1.9 | 3.5±2.8 | 0.05 |
| The anterior vertical dimension of the face | 118.7 ± 9.0 | 121.5± 10.2 | 0.001 |
| The posterior vertical dimension of the face | 76.9 ± 8.5 | 76.2 ± 8.6 | |
| SNA angle | 82.3 ± 4.4 | 82.4 ± 4.2 | |
| SNB angle | 80.9 ± 4.8 | 80.4 ± 4.4 | |
| ANB angle | 1.5 ± 2.0 | 2.6 ± 2.9 | 0.002 |
| N-Ba-S angle | 127.7 ± 5.7 | 127.4 ± 5.8 | |
| NSL/NL( maxillary inclination) | 7.0 ± 2.9 | 7.1 ± 3.2 | |
| NSL/ML( mandible inclination) | 23.6 ± 6.8 | 27.5 ± 6.1 | 0.001 |
| Inclination of upper incisors | 72.3 ± 11.4 | 72.6 ± 10.8 | |
| Inclination of lower incisors | 87.1 ± 8.1 | 86.4 ± 7.8 | |
| Inter-incisor angle | 141.1 ± 9.1 | 138.7 ± 13.3 | 0.002 |
| Ar-Go-N angle | 50.9 ± 3.6 | 49.5±3.7 | |
| N-Go-Me angle | 68.7 ± 4.9 | 71.3±4.5 | 0,001 |
| Basal angle | 18.8 ± 6.8 | 25.6±5.7 | 0.001 |
| Facial axis angle | 92.3 ± 4.7 | 89.7±9 | 0.001 |
P< statistically significant difference between the result before and after the treatment
The Comparison of Mean Value Activities (µV) of Masticatory Muscles During Maximal Teeth Clench and Mouth Opening before and after the Treatment. Mean Values ± SD were Given
| Before Treatment | The1st Day after Treatment | Three Months Later | |
|---|---|---|---|
| M.T. (µV) | 70.9 ± 29.3 | 56.6 ± 28.8 | 80.0 ± 34.4 |
| M. M. (µV) | 84.9 ± 31.8 | 74.7 ± 21.8 | 102.8 ± 34.8 |
| M. D. (µV) | 14.5 ± 6.2 | 12.9 ± 5.2 | 15.6 ± 6.4 |
| M. SCM. (µV) | 11.9 ± 5.8 | 20.1 ± 6.3 | 10.5 ± 4.7 |
| M. T. (µV) | 9.2 ± 3.9 | 11.3 ± 4.9 | 9.4 ± 3.1 |
| M. M. (µV) | 8.5 ± 3.9 | 12.0 ± 4.7 | 13.9 ± 2.5 |
| M. D. (µV) | 19.7 ± 8.9 | 18.1 ± 8.4 | 21.4 ± 9.8 |
| M. SCM. (µV) | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 7.2 ± 3.6 | 7.3 ± 3.0 |
M.T.- temporal muscles, M.M.- masseters, M.D.- digastric muscles, M.SCM- sternocleidomastoides
p< 0,05 in relation to the result before treatment
p<0,05 between the 1st day after treatment and 3 months later
The Comparison of Occlusal Parameters before the Treatment, on the First day after the Treatment and after Three Months after the Treatment. Mean Values ± SD were Given
| Before Treatment | The 1st Day after Treatment | Three Months Later | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TO (s) | 0.31 ± 0.15 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.04 |
| TDR (s) | 0.24 ± 0.06 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.07 |
| TDL (s) | 0.32 ± 0.15 | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 0.25 ± 0.06 |
TO- the time of occlusion , i.e. the time from the first tooth contact to the maximal intercuspation, TDR- the time of disclusion right, the time from the maximal intercuspation to complete disclusion during the right Lateran movement, TDL- the time of disclusion left, the time from the maximal intercuspation to complete disclusion during the left lateral movement
p<0,05 in relation to the result before treatment.