| Literature DB >> 23802003 |
Abstract
The pressure flow model of phloem transport envisaged by Münch (1930) has gained wide acceptance. Recently, however, the model has been questioned on structural and physiological grounds. For instance, sub-structures of sieve elements may reduce their hydraulic conductances to levels that impede flow rates of phloem sap and observed magnitudes of pressure gradients to drive flow along sieve tubes could be inadequate in tall trees. A variant of the Münch pressure flow model, the high-pressure manifold model of phloem transport introduced by Donald Fisher may serve to reconcile at least some of these questions. To this end, key predicted features of the high-pressure manifold model of phloem transport are evaluated against current knowledge of the physiology of phloem transport. These features include: (1) An absence of significant gradients in axial hydrostatic pressure in sieve elements from collection to release phloem accompanied by transport properties of sieve elements that underpin this outcome; (2) Symplasmic pathways of phloem unloading into sink organs impose a major constraint over bulk flow rates of resources translocated through the source-path-sink system; (3) Hydraulic conductances of plasmodesmata, linking sieve elements with surrounding phloem parenchyma cells, are sufficient to support and also regulate bulk flow rates exiting from sieve elements of release phloem. The review identifies strong circumstantial evidence that resource transport through the source-path-sink system is consistent with the high-pressure manifold model of phloem transport. The analysis then moves to exploring mechanisms that may link demand for resources, by cells of meristematic and expansion/storage sinks, with plasmodesmal conductances of release phloem. The review concludes with a brief discussion of how these mechanisms may offer novel opportunities to enhance crop biomass yields.Entities:
Keywords: Bulk flow; hydraulic conductance; hydrostatic pressure; phloem transport; plasmodesmata; resource partitioning; symplasmic phloem unloading
Year: 2013 PMID: 23802003 PMCID: PMC3685801 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1High-pressure manifold model that describes phloem transport from source to sink and partitioning of resources (water and dissolved solutes) between sinks. Sucrose is loaded (brown arrows) into the collection phloem (minor veins; yellow borders) of source leaves to high concentrations (dark purple) that drives an osmotic uptake of water (blue arrows). Walls of the collection phloem SEs resist the volume change with a consequent development of high hydrostatic pressures (example given, 1.4 MPa and see Table 1). STs form conduits interconnecting sources (dark green) to sinks (light purple) in a supercellular symplasm comprising collection, transport (dark green) and release (khaki) phloem. Hydrostatic pressures, generated in collection phloem SEs, are rapidly transmitted throughout the entire ST system and maintained by pressure-dependent retrieval of leaked sucrose and hence water (curved brown and blue arrows respectively). Thus STs are conceived to function as high-pressure conduits rendering resources equally available throughout a plant. Transported resources are unloaded from the release phloem SE/CC complexes as a bulk flow through high resistance (low conductance L and see Equation 2) plasmodesmal pathways into the sink cells. SE/CC unloading imposes the greatest constraint over resource flow through the source-transport-sink pathway. As a consequence, resource partitioning between sinks is finely regulated by their relative hydraulic conductances of plasmodesmata linking SE/CC complexes with the surrounding phloem parenchyma cells.
Measures of sieve tube hydrostatic pressures (MPa) using micromanometers glued to severed aphid stylets inserted into translocating sieve tubes, in specified plant organs and species.
| Leaf | 0.8–1.4 | Gould et al., | |
| (Barley) | Root | 1.62 ± 0.05 | Gould et al., |
| Leaf | 1.0–1.5 | Gould et al., | |
| (Sow thistle) | Stem | 0.7–1.0 | Gould et al., |
| Peduncle | 2.35 ± 0.56 | Fisher and Cash-Clark, | |
| (Wheat) | Grain | 1.16 ± 0.26 | |
| Leaf | 0.51–0.93 | Wright and Fisher, | |
| (Willow) | Bark strip | 0.47–1.2 | Wright and Fisher, |
Osmotic or hydrostatic pressures of sieve tubes and adjoining specified cells in root tips and developing wheat grains.
| Osmotic | −1.62 | −0.98 | −0.64 | Maize | Warmbrodt, |
| Osmotic | −1.42 | −0.71 | −0.71 | Barley | Prichard, |
| Turgor | |||||
| 1.62 | 0.33 | 1.29 | Barley | Gould et al., | |
| 1.32 | 0.32 | 1.0 | |||
| Turgor | Wheat | Fisher and Cash-Clark, | |||
| 1.11 | 0.12 | 1.0 | |||
| 1.30 | 0.08 | 1.12 | |||
Adapted from Patrick (2012).
Impact of differing plasmodesmal (pd) microchannel radii.
| 0.5 | 2.46 | 472,313 | 33 | 143,125 |
| 1.0 | 39.3 | 29,524 | 17 | 17,367 |
| 1.5 | 199 | 5832 | 11 | 5302 |
| 2.0 | 629 | 1845 | 8 | 2306 |
| 4.0 | 10,057 | 115 | 4 | 288 |
| 8.0 | 160,916 | 7 | 2 | 35.0 |
| 10.0 | 392,900 | 3 | 1 | 10.0 |
Plasmodesmal number estimates are compared with an observed value for developing wheat grains at the SE/CC complex and vascular parenchyma cell interface of 44,000 × 103 per grain (Wang et al., 1995).
Estimates of microchannel radii of plasmodesmata (for details, see Section Is Symplasmic Sieve Element Unloading Dominated by Bulk Flow?)
Observed by volume flow rate (Rv) of 11.6 × 1013 nm3 s−1 (Fisher, 1990).
Averaged phloem sap viscosity of 2 × 10−9 MPa s (Mullendore et al., 2010).
Cell wall thickness and hence plasmodesmatal length between SE/CC complexes and vascular parenchyma cells in developing wheat grains—500 nm (Fisher and Cash-Clark, 2000a).
Rv predicted using the nominated data sets in the Hagen-Poiseuille Law (Equation 1).
Microchannel numbers supporting observed Rv derived as the ratio of observed by volume flowa to predicted flow rate per microchannele.
Microchannel numbers per plasmodesmata were estimated assuming that their equators (diameters) are positioned on a circumference of half the internal radius (i.e., 10.5 nm—Wang et al., 1995) of plasmodesmata interconnecting SE/CC complexes to vascular parenchyma cells and that they occupy 50% of this circumference.
Plasmodesmal numbers supporting the observed Rv derived as the ratio of microchannel numbers supporting observed Rfv and microchannel numbers per plasmodesmatag.
Comparison of estimated transport rates of sucrose by diffusion and by bulk flow through a specified range of plasmodesmal microchannel radii each with a length of 500 nm for reported sucrose concentrations (C) in SEs.
| 0.5 | 1.64 | 3.28 | 0.22 | 0.14 |
| 1.0 | 6.53 | 13.1 | 1.77 | 2.36 |
| 1.5 | 14.7 | 29.4 | 8.95 | 11.9 |
| 2.0 | 26.2 | 52.3 | 28.2 | 37.7 |
| 4.0 | 105 | 209 | 453 | 603 |
| 8.0 | 418 | 837 | 7,241 | 9,655 |
Rates of sucrose diffusion were estimated using Fick's First Law (Equation 3) for two trans-plasmodesmal differences in sucrose concentration (ΔC). Bulk flow rates of sucrose were estimated as the product of estimated volume flow rates (see Table 3 and Equation 1) and SE sucrose concentrations (C).
Sucrose concentrations of SE sap collected from exuding pedicels of developing wheat grains ranged from 450 to 600 mM (Fisher and Gifford, 1986).
Sucrose concentrations detected in frozen tissue slices of developing wheat grains containing vascular parenchyma cells ranged from 200 to 260 mM (Fisher and Wang, 1995). These concentrations are assumed to be representative of cytosolic sucrose concentrations in vascular parenchyma cells abutting SE/CC complexes. This assumption is an approximation as it respectively accepts that cytosolic and vacuolar sucrose concentrations are in equilibrium and that the sucrose concentration in all vascular parenchyma cells is identical.
Dsucrose is 0.52 × 109 nm2 s−1 in water at 25 °C. ΔC values are derived from differences between SEa and vascular parenchymab sucrose concentrations.
Figure 2Model of a high resistance pathway encountered by resource flow from transport phloem (green) into meristematic sinks through protophloem SEs differentiating from provascular cells (khaki) arranged in series with symplasmic movement through plasmodesmata of meristematic cells (brown). One tier of sink control of resource import is mediated by phytohormones integrating hydraulic conductances of this transport pathway with sink demand as illustrated for indole-3-actic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3) and cytokinins (Cytks). During differentiation, each developing SE forms a large central vacuole (blue) and conspicuous protein bodies and plastids (red). Their vacuole and nucleus (purple) finally degrade to leave a parietal cytoplasm of protein bodies and plastids. Co-incidentally pit fields of plasmodemata coalesce into sieve pores.
Figure 3Turgor homeostasis model of phloem unloading in developing seeds of grain legumes. Sucrose uptake by, and storage, in cotyledons is coupled through a negative feedback transcriptional regulation of sucrose transporter activity mediated through intracellular sucrose levels. Activities of seed coat sucrose effluxers are coordinated with cotyledon demand by a turgor-homeostat mechanism that osmotically (π) detects alterations (error signal) in apoplasmic sucrose pool sizes as a deviation from a turgor (P) set point. Symplasmic unloading from release phloem SE/CC complexes by bulk flow is regulated by plasmodesmal hydraulic conductances (L) under control of the turgor homeostat functioning as a central control hub to regulate resource flow from SE/CC complexes to ultimate storage in cotyledons.