Literature DB >> 23801744

Temporal and spatial dispersion of human body temperature during deep hypothermia.

O Opatz1, T Trippel, A Lochner, A Werner, A Stahn, M Steinach, J Lenk, H Kuppe, H C Gunga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical temperature management remains challenging. Choosing the right sensor location to determine the core body temperature is a particular matter of academic and clinical debate. This study aimed to investigate the relationship of measured temperatures at different sites during surgery in deep hypothermic patients.
METHODS: In this prospective single-centre study, we studied 24 patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery: 12 in normothermia, 3 in mild, and 9 in deep hypothermia. Temperature recordings of a non-invasive heat flux sensor at the forehead were compared with the arterial outlet temperature of a heart-lung machine, with the temperature on a conventional vesical bladder thermistor and, for patients undergoing deep hypothermia, with oesophageal temperature.
RESULTS: Using a linear model for sensor comparison, the arterial outlet sensor showed a difference among the other sensor positions between -0.54 and -1.12°C. The 95% confidence interval ranged between 7.06 and 8.82°C for the upper limit and -8.14 and -10.62°C for the lower limit. Because of the hysteretic shape, the curves were divided into phases and fitted into a non-linear model according to time and placement of the sensors. During cooling and warming phases, a quadratic relationship could be observed among arterial, oesophageal, vesical, and cranial temperature recordings, with coefficients of determination ranging between 0.95 and 0.98 (standard errors of the estimate 0.69-1.12°C).
CONCLUSION: We suggest that measured surrogate temperatures as indices of the cerebral temperature (e.g. vesical bladder temperature) should be interpreted with respect to the temporal and spatial dispersion during cooling and rewarming phases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body temperature; deep hypothermics circulatory arrest; intraoperative monitoring; mathematical model; non-linear model

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801744     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

1.  Increased core body temperature in astronauts during long-duration space missions.

Authors:  Alexander C Stahn; Andreas Werner; Oliver Opatz; Martina A Maggioni; Mathias Steinach; Victoria Weller von Ahlefeld; Alan Moore; Brian E Crucian; Scott M Smith; Sara R Zwart; Thomas Schlabs; Stefan Mendt; Tobias Trippel; Eberhard Koralewski; Jochim Koch; Alexander Choukèr; Günther Reitz; Peng Shang; Lothar Röcker; Karl A Kirsch; Hanns-Christian Gunga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Accidental Hypothermia: 2021 Update.

Authors:  Peter Paal; Mathieu Pasquier; Tomasz Darocha; Raimund Lechner; Sylweriusz Kosinski; Bernd Wallner; Ken Zafren; Hermann Brugger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Low Ambient Temperature Exposition Impairs the Accuracy of a Non-invasive Heat-Flux Thermometer.

Authors:  Michela Masè; Andreas Werner; Gabriel Putzer; Giovanni Avancini; Marika Falla; Hermann Brugger; Alessandro Micarelli; Giacomo Strapazzon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.