OBJECTIVE: The recurrence rate of meningioma after surgery is high, and progression is often observed. The risk factors for recurrence and progression are not clear. We evaluated the risk factors for recurrence and progression in meningioma using (11)C-methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (mean follow-up, 80 months) with an intracranial meningioma were enrolled. MET PET was performed before treatment between 1995 and 2010, and patients were followed up in an out-patient clinic. Surgery was performed in 33 patients, and a wait-and-see approach was taken in four patients. We evaluated the extent of tumor resection, location, WHO grade, Ki-67 labeling index, and lesion to normal ratio (LN ratio) of MET uptake. RESULTS: Six of the surgical cases had a recurrence, and two of the observation-only patients had tumor progression. A high LN ratio of MET uptake was a significant risk factor for recurrence and progression with univariate analysis. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve for the LN ratio of MET uptake was 0.754, and the optimal cutoff value was 3.18 (sensitivity 63 %, specificity 79 %). With multivariate analysis, a high LN ratio of MET uptake, non-gross total resection, and a high WHO grade were significant risk factors for progression and recurrence. CONCLUSION: A high LN ratio of MET uptake was a risk factor for tumor progression and recurrence. The advantage of MET PET is that it is not invasive and can easily be used to evaluate the whole tumor.
OBJECTIVE: The recurrence rate of meningioma after surgery is high, and progression is often observed. The risk factors for recurrence and progression are not clear. We evaluated the risk factors for recurrence and progression in meningioma using (11)C-methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (mean follow-up, 80 months) with an intracranial meningioma were enrolled. MET PET was performed before treatment between 1995 and 2010, and patients were followed up in an out-patient clinic. Surgery was performed in 33 patients, and a wait-and-see approach was taken in four patients. We evaluated the extent of tumor resection, location, WHO grade, Ki-67 labeling index, and lesion to normal ratio (LN ratio) of MET uptake. RESULTS: Six of the surgical cases had a recurrence, and two of the observation-only patients had tumor progression. A high LN ratio of MET uptake was a significant risk factor for recurrence and progression with univariate analysis. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve for the LN ratio of MET uptake was 0.754, and the optimal cutoff value was 3.18 (sensitivity 63 %, specificity 79 %). With multivariate analysis, a high LN ratio of MET uptake, non-gross total resection, and a high WHO grade were significant risk factors for progression and recurrence. CONCLUSION: A high LN ratio of MET uptake was a risk factor for tumor progression and recurrence. The advantage of MET PET is that it is not invasive and can easily be used to evaluate the whole tumor.
Authors: Martha Nowosielski; Norbert Galldiks; Sarah Iglseder; Philipp Kickingereder; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Felix Sahm Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Edit Bosnyák; David O Kamson; Anthony R Guastella; Kaushik Varadarajan; Natasha L Robinette; William J Kupsky; Otto Muzik; Sharon K Michelhaugh; Sandeep Mittal; Csaba Juhász Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Nathalie L Albert; Michael Sommerauer; Anca L Grosu; Ute Ganswindt; Ian Law; Matthias Preusser; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gelareh Zadeh; Frédéric Dhermain; Michael Weller; Karl-Josef Langen; Jörg C Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Angela N Viaene; Bo Zhang; Maria Martinez-Lage; Chaomei Xiang; Umberto Tosi; Jayesh P Thawani; Busra Gungor; Yuankun Zhu; Laura Roccograndi; Logan Zhang; Robert L Bailey; Phillip B Storm; Donald M O'Rourke; Adam C Resnick; M Sean Grady; Nadia Dahmane Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: K Mariam Slot; Dagmar Verbaan; Dennis R Buis; Linda J Schoonmade; Bart N M Berckel; W Peter Vandertop Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Frank Angenstein; Jan-Michael Werner; Elena K Bauer; Robin Gutsche; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Philipp Lohmann Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2022-03 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Hanne-Rinck Jeltema; Marnix R Jansen; Adriaan R E Potgieser; Antoinette D I van Asselt; Mart A A M Heesters; Anouk van de Hoorn; Andor W J M Glaudemans; J Marc C van Dijk Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 2.804