Literature DB >> 23800872

Venous angioarchitectural features of intracranial dural arteriovenous shunt and its relation to the clinical course.

Na-Young Shin1, Young Sub Kwon, Sam Yeol Ha, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Ik Kim, Dong Joon Kim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between the venous angioarchitectural features and the clinical course of intracranial dural arteriovenous shunt (DAVS) with cortical venous reflux (CVR).
METHODS: With institutional review board approval, 41 patients (M:F = 24:17; median age, 52 years (range, 1-72 years), median follow-up; 1.5 years; partial treatment, n = 36) with persistent CVR were included. We evaluated the initial presentation and the incidence of annual morbidity (hemorrhage or new/worsened nonhemorrhagic neurological deficit (NHND)) according to the venous angiographic patterns-isolated venous sinus, occlusion of the draining sinus, direct pial venous drainage, pseudophlebitic pattern, venous ectasia, brisk venous drainage, and length of pial vein reflux-on digital subtraction angiography. Cox regression was performed to identify independent factors for clinical course.
RESULTS: During 111.9 patient-years of follow-up, the overall annual morbidity rate was 11.6 % (mortality; n = 3, rate; 2.6 %/year). Hemorrhage occurred in five patients (12.2 %, rate; 4.5 %/year) and new/worsened NHND occurred in eight patients (19.5 %, rate; 7.2 %/year). Patients with isolated venous sinus, direct pial venous drainage, and pseudophlebitic pattern were associated with initial aggressive presentation. Venous ectasia was associated with initial hemorrhagic presentation. Brisk venous drainage was associated with initial benign presentation. Patients with isolated venous sinus showed a poor clinical course with a higher annual incidence of hemorrhage or new/worsened NHND (91.2 %/year vs 9.2 %/year; hazard ratio, 6.681; p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: Venous angioarchitectural features may be predictive of the clinical course of DAVSs. DAVS patients with isolated venous sinus may be especially at high risk for future aggressive clinical course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23800872     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-013-1222-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of cerebral venous blood flow: from experimental data in animals to normal function in humans.

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2004-11

2.  Asymptomatic spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: pathomechanical considerations.

Authors:  Kenichi Sato; Karel G Terbrugge; Timo Krings
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-02

3.  Direct packing of the isolated sinus in patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse-sigmoid sinus.

Authors:  S Endo; N Kuwayama; A Takaku; M Nishijima
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Tortuous, engorged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients.

Authors:  R Willinsky; M Goyal; K terBrugge; W Montanera
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Radiologic assessment of brain arteriovenous malformations: what clinicians need to know.

Authors:  Sasikhan Geibprasert; Sirintara Pongpech; Pakorn Jiarakongmun; Manohar M Shroff; Derek C Armstrong; Timo Krings
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Early rebleeding from intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: report of 20 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  H Duffau; M Lopes; V Janosevic; J P Sichez; T Faillot; L Capelle; M Ismaïl; A Bitar; F Arthuis; D Fohanno
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Natural history of dural arteriovenous shunts.

Authors:  Michael Söderman; Ladislav Pavic; Göran Edner; Staffan Holmin; Tommy Andersson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Grading venous restrictive disease in patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas of the transverse/sigmoid sinus.

Authors:  A K Lalwani; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  P Lasjaunias; M Chiu; K ter Brugge; A Tolia; M Hurth; M Bernstein
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage.

Authors:  C Cognard; Y P Gobin; L Pierot; A L Bailly; E Houdart; A Casasco; J Chiras; J J Merland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cranial dural arteriovenous shunts. Part 4. Clinical presentation of the shunts with leptomeningeal venous drainage.

Authors:  Gerasimos Baltsavias; Alex Spiessberger; Torsten Hothorn; Anton Valavanis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Are type I dural arteriovenous fistulas safe? Single-centre experience of endovascular treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Authors:  Krzysztof Brzozowski; Jerzy Narloch; Piotr Piasecki; Piotr Zięcina; Andrzej Koziarski
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-05

3.  Risk Factors of Aggressive Clinical Presentation in Patients with Angiographically Aggressive Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Wen; Hsien-Chung Chen; Shun-Tai Yang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.