Literature DB >> 23800714

Regional experiences of tissue donation and forensic medicine in hamburg - results of a 5-year period.

Birgit Wulff1, Katja Müller, Axel Heinemann, Klaus Püschel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present the operational organization and daily workflow of our Hamburg model and the results of the years 2007-2011 concerning donation of corneas, musculoskeletal and, since 2010, cardiovascular tissues.
METHODS: Each of the about 3,600 deceased every year undergoes an evaluation process by two coordinators on duty, the tissue coordinator and the family coordinator. All donation connected issues are carried out within the standardized protocols of a quality management system and documented in a special data base. Two catamnestic surveys evaluated the satisfaction of donor families retrospectively. The inclusion rate for cornea donation was 23% and for musculoskeletal donation 10%, with a decrease after the 75 years age restriction of musculoskeletal donors in 2011 defined by the contracting tissue bank German Institute for Cell and Tissue Replacement gGmbH (DIZG), Berlin.
RESULTS: Since 2007 1,268 corneas were explanted altogether, reflecting an increasing explantation rate from 156 (University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UMC: 9) in 2007 up to 304 (UMC: 52) in 2011. Overall 173 musculoskeletal donors (5 years) and 11 cardiovascular donors (2 years) spent tissues. The consent rate was much higher. The evaluation of the families reflected a positive feedback for the guiding of the donation process.
CONCLUSION: Forensic institutes can act as an interface between donors and recipients without neglecting forensic investigations. They are uniquely positioned to recognize potential donors. In addition, the contact with a physician of the forensic institute may help families during the mourning phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic institute; Tissue donation; Tissue donation results; Tissue transplants

Year:  2012        PMID: 23800714      PMCID: PMC3678271          DOI: 10.1159/000345563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother        ISSN: 1660-3796            Impact factor:   3.747


  5 in total

1.  Questioning the relatives for organ and tissue donation.

Authors:  T Bredehorn; C Langer; A Eichhorst; D Bormke; C Wachsmuth
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  [Musculoskeletal tissue banks. Legal foundations and graft safety].

Authors:  A Prub; B-D Katthagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Informed consent to postmortem tissue donation: a catamnestic survey within a year of the donor's death].

Authors:  Birgit Wulff; Stephanie Meins; Axel Heinemann; Carolin Edler; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Arch Kriminol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

4.  Theoretic rates of potential tissue donation in a university hospital.

Authors:  T Pont; R M Gràcia; C Valdés; C Nieto; L Rodellar; I Arancibia; R Deulofeu Vilarnau
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Family, patients, and organ and tissue donation: who decides?

Authors:  J Schirmer; B de Aguiar Roza
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.066

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Current trends in tissue banking.

Authors:  Axel Pruss; Ulrich Kalus
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.747

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.