Literature DB >> 23800202

Estimating animal resource selection from telemetry data using point process models.

Devin S Johnson1, Mevin B Hooten, Carey E Kuhn.   

Abstract

1. Analyses of animal resource selection functions (RSF) using data collected from relocations of individuals via remote telemetry devices have become commonplace. Increasing technological advances, however, have produced statistical challenges in analysing such highly autocorrelated data. Weighted distribution methods have been proposed for analysing RSFs with telemetry data. However, they can be computationally challenging due to an intractable normalizing constant and cannot be aggregated (i.e. collapsed) over time to make space-only inference. 2. In this study, we take a conceptually different approach to modelling animal telemetry data for making RSF inference. We consider the telemetry data to be a realization of a space-time point process. Under the point process paradigm, the times of the relocations are also considered to be random rather than fixed. 3. We show the point process models we propose are a generalization of the weighted distribution telemetry models. By generalizing the weighted model, we can access several numerical techniques for evaluating point process likelihoods that make use of common statistical software. Thus, the analysis methods can be readily implemented by animal ecologists. 4. In addition to ease of computation, the point process models can be aggregated over time by marginalizing over the temporal component of the model. This allows a full range of models to be constructed for RSF analysis at the individual movement level up to the study area level. 5. To demonstrate the analysis of telemetry data with the point process approach, we analysed a data set of telemetry locations from northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) in the Pribilof Islands, Alaska. Both a space-time and an aggregated space-only model were fitted. At the individual level, the space-time analysis showed little selection relative to the habitat covariates. However, at the study area level, the space-only model showed strong selection relative to the covariates.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal telemetry; point process; resource selection; space–time; weighted distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23800202     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

Review 1.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

2.  Dynamical facilitation of the ideal free distribution in nonideal populations.

Authors:  Garrett M Street; Igor V Erovenko; Jonathan T Rowell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Modified home range kernel density estimators that take environmental interactions into account.

Authors:  Guillaume Péron
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.600

4.  Analysis of local habitat selection and large-scale attraction/avoidance based on animal tracking data: is there a single best method?

Authors:  Moritz Mercker; Philipp Schwemmer; Verena Peschko; Leonie Enners; Stefan Garthe
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.600

5.  Resource-Area-Dependence Analysis: Inferring animal resource needs from home-range and mapping data.

Authors:  Robert E Kenward; Eduardo M Arraut; Peter A Robertson; Sean S Walls; Nicholas M Casey; Nicholas J Aebischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Habitat selection of an endangered primate, the samango monkey (Cercopithecus albogularis schwarzi): Integrating scales to prioritize habitat for wildlife management.

Authors:  Edwin J Parker; Nicola F Koyama; Russell A Hill
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Habitat selection patterns are density dependent under the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  Tal Avgar; Gustavo S Betini; John M Fryxell
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.