Literature DB >> 23800164

Reducing the length of stay for acute hospital patients needing admission into inpatient rehabilitation: a multicentre study of process barriers.

P W New1, N Andrianopoulos, P A Cameron, J H Olver, J U Stoelwinder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient flow is a major problem in hospitals. Delays in accessing inpatient rehabilitation have not been well studied. AIMS: Measure the time taken for key processes in the patient journey from acute hospital admission through to inpatient rehabilitation admission in order to identify opportunities for improvement.
METHODS: Retrospective open cohort study. All patients admitted over 8- and 10-month periods during 2008 into two inpatient rehabilitation units in Melbourne, Australia. Main outcome measures were the duration of the following key processes: acute hospital admission until referral for rehabilitation, referral until assessment by the rehabilitation service, assessment until deemed ready for transfer to rehabilitation, ready for transfer until rehabilitation admission.
RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty patients were in the study sample (females = 186; 51.7%); mean age = 58.4 (standard deviation = 15.0) years. There was a median of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-13) days from acute hospital admission till referral for rehabilitation, a median of 1 (IQR 0-1) day from referral till assessment, a median of 0 (IQR 0-2) days from assessment till deemed ready for transfer and a median of 1 (IQR 0-3) day from ready till admission into rehabilitation. Overall, patients spent 12.0% (804/6682) of their acute hospital admission waiting for a rehabilitation bed.
CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities to improve the efficiency of key processes in the acute hospital journey for patients subsequently admitted to inpatient rehabilitation; in particular, reducing the time from acute hospital admission till referral for rehabilitation and from being deemed ready for transfer to rehabilitation till admission.
© 2013 The Authors; Internal Medicine Journal © 2013 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery of healthcare; health service accessibility; outcome and process assessment (healthcare); patient discharge; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23800164     DOI: 10.1111/imj.12227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  8 in total

1.  Predicting discharge placement after elective surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis using machine learning methods.

Authors:  Paul T Ogink; Aditya V Karhade; Quirina C B S Thio; William B Gormley; Fetullah C Oner; Jorrit J Verlaan; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Emotional Consequences of Delays in Spinal Rehabilitation Unit Admission or Discharge: A Qualitative Study on the Importance of Communication.

Authors:  Narelle Warren; Karin Walford; Annisha Susilo; Peter Wayne New
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  Time-series analysis of the barriers for admission into a spinal rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  P W New; M Akram
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Development and internal validation of predictive models to assess risk of post-acute care facility discharge in adults undergoing multi-level instrumented fusions for lumbar degenerative pathology and spinal deformity.

Authors:  Ayush Arora; Joshua Demb; Daniel D Cummins; Vedat Deviren; Aaron J Clark; Christopher P Ames; Alekos A Theologis
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-09-20

5.  Inpatient Rehabilitation after Liver Transplantation Decreases Risk and Severity of 30-Day Readmissions.

Authors:  Anai N Kothari; Ryan M Yau; Robert H Blackwell; Colleen Schaidle-Blackburn; Talar Markossian; Matthew A C Zapf; Amy D Lu; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Prolonged patients' In-Hospital Waiting Period after discharge eligibility is associated with increased risk of infection, morbidity and mortality: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Maya Rosman; Orna Rachminov; Omer Segal; Gad Segal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Targeted rehabilitation may improve patient flow and outcomes: development and implementation of a novel Proactive Rehabilitation Screening (PReS) service.

Authors:  Jane Wu; Olivia Misa; Christine T Shiner; Steven G Faux
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-03

8.  Time to treatment initiation and outcomes in high-grade glioma patients in rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kwanza T Warren; Linxi Liu; Yang Liu; Myla S Strawderman; Ali H Hussain; Heather M Ma; Michael T Milano; Nimish A Mohile; Kevin A Walter
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2020-10-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.