| Literature DB >> 23799182 |
Abbas Farahavar1, Abolfazl Shirazi, Hamid Kohram, Ahmad Zareh Shahneh, Ali Sarvari, Mohammad Mehdi Naderi, Sara Borjian Boroujeni, Mehdi Zhandi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The basal medium that supports Isolated Mouse Oviduct (IMO) is important for supporting embryo development and quality.Entities:
Keywords: Embryo; Mice; Organ culture technique; Ovine
Year: 2013 PMID: 23799182 PMCID: PMC3689557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Med Biotechnol ISSN: 2008-2835
Figure 1Ampulary segment of mouse oviduct containing ovine embryos 6 days after culture with, A) SOFaaciBSA; B) SOFaaBSA. Arrows show ovine blastocyst
Effect of post zygotic culture condition on ovine embryo development
| Culture medium | No. of zygotes | Cleaved no. ( | Blastocyst yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| D6 no. ( | D7 no. ( | D8 no. ( | Hatched no. ( | |||
|
| 150 | 133 (89.88±3.45) | 29 (21.89±1.07) | 48 (24.84±1.24) | 56 (38.5±1.82) | 26 (46.42)b |
|
| 78 | 64 (82.73±2.75) | 21 (29.83±1.43) | 28 (32.46±1.62) | 29 (40.63±1.91) | 21 (72.41)a |
|
| 94 | 75 (80.83±2.76) | 20 (22.4±1.1) | 26 (26.2±1.3) | 29 (30.8±1.49) | 22 (75.86)a |
IMO: Isolated mouse oviduct.Values in the same columns with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). Results were reported as Lsmeans±SD
Hatching rate analyzed by chi-square test
Post fertilization development of poor quality ovine oocytes cultured in IMO
| Culture medium | No. of zygotes | Cleaved no. ( | Blastocyst yield | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| D6 no. ( | D7 no. ( | |||
|
| 85 | 74 (88.3) | 10 (11.72) a | 12 (26.42) |
|
| 59 | 49 (82.55) | 15 (24.42) b | 18 (31.08) |
|
| 86 | 77 (87.4) | 21 (24.66) b | 16 (31.16) |
|
| 3.31 | 3.6 | 7.4 | |
IMO: Isolated mouse oviduct. Values in the same columns with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). Results were reported as Lsmeans±SE
Figure 2Morphological appearance of ovine blastocysts originated form, A) IMO with SOFaaciBSA; B & C) IMO with SOFaaBSA and D) SOFaaBSA alone. The integrity of the inner cell mass and more regular distribution of therphoctoderm cells in IMO produced embryos were considered during morphological evaluation
Evaluation of blastocyst quality by morphologic methods in different post zygotic culture condition.
| Groups | No. of evaluated blastocyst | Excellent, no. ( | Good, no. ( | Fair and poor, no. | Blastocyst diameter at hatch ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 29 | 3 (10.34) a | 20 (68.9) a | 6 (20.7) | 257±6.42 b |
|
| 29 | 12 (51.72) b | 12 (41) b | 1 (4.7) | 240±8.1a,b |
|
| 21 | 15 (57.14) b | 8 (38.1) b | 2 (6.9) | 225±6.42 a |
Ovine blastocyst cell numbers derived from IVM/IVF zygotes cultured in different conditions
| No. blastocysts | SOFaaBSA alone | IMO with SOFaaciBSA | IMO with SOFaaBSA |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 21 | 17 | 15 | |
|
| 74.26±16.12 b | 136.48±33.88 a | 146.67±36.96 a |
|
| 14.07±1.87 | 28.56±4.81 | 29.76±5.07 |
|
| 59.25±24.36 b | 106.33±25.03 a | 114.36±27.35 a |
|
| 0.23±0.017 | 0.27±0.017 | 0.26±0.017 |
Values in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). Results were reported as Lsmeans±SD.
Figure 3Differential staining of ovine blastocyst which had been originated from different culture conditions. A) IMO with SOFaaBSA; B) IMO with SOFaaciBSA; C) SOFaaBSA alone. The normal allocation and integrity of inner cell mass between IMO produced blastocyst and SOFaaBSA alone was significantly different