Literature DB >> 23798605

Reverse engineering of the selective agonist TBPB unveils both orthosteric and allosteric modes of action at the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Peter Keov1, Celine Valant, Shane M Devine, J Robert Lane, Peter J Scammells, Patrick M Sexton, Arthur Christopoulos.   

Abstract

Recent interest in the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (mAChR) has led to the discovery of various selective agonists for the receptor. The novel selective agonist 1-(1'-(2-methylbenzyl)-1,4'-bipiperidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2(3H)-1 (TBPB) displays unprecedented functional selectivity at the M₁ mAChR. This functional selectivity has been described to stem from sole interaction with an allosteric site, although the evidence for such a mechanism is equivocal. To delineate TBPB's mechanism of action, several truncated variants of TBPB were synthesized and characterized. Binding experiments with [³H]N-methylscopolamine at the M₁, M₂, M₃, and M₄ mAChRs revealed radioligand displacement in a manner consistent with a competitive binding mode at the orthosteric site by TBPB and fragment derivatives. Cell-based functional assays of fragment derivatives of TBPB identified both agonistic and antagonistic moieties, one of which, 1-(1-cyclohexylpiperidin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2(3H)-1 (VCP794), lost agonistic selectivity for the M₁ mAChR. Further interaction experiments between TBPB or its antagonist fragments with ACh also indicated a mechanism consistent with competitive binding at mAChRs. However, interaction with an allosteric site by an antagonist fragment of TBPB was demonstrated via its ability to retard radioligand dissociation. To reconcile this dual orthosteric/allosteric pharmacological behavior, we propose that TBPB is a bitopic ligand, interacting with both the orthosteric site and an allosteric site, at the M₁ mAChR. This mechanism may also be the case for other selective agonists for mAChRs, and should be taken into consideration in the profiling and classification of new novel selective agonists for this receptor family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23798605     DOI: 10.1124/mol.113.087320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  10 in total

1.  Molecular mechanisms of bitopic ligand engagement with the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Peter Keov; Laura López; Shane M Devine; Celine Valant; J Robert Lane; Peter J Scammells; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Brian K Kobilka; Dinesh Gautam; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Allosteric modulation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor internalization and subcellular trafficking.

Authors:  Holly R Yeatman; J Robert Lane; Kwok Ho Christopher Choy; Nevin A Lambert; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; Meritxell Canals
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Investigation of the binding and functional properties of extended length D3 dopamine receptor-selective antagonists.

Authors:  Cheryse A Furman; Rebecca A Roof; Amy E Moritz; Brittney N Miller; Trevor B Doyle; R Benjamin Free; Ashwini K Banala; Noel M Paul; Vivek Kumar; Christopher D Sibley; Amy Hauck Newman; David R Sibley
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.600

5.  Diverse Effects on M1 Signaling and Adverse Effect Liability within a Series of M1 Ago-PAMs.

Authors:  Jerri M Rook; Masahito Abe; Hyekyung P Cho; Kellie D Nance; Vincent B Luscombe; Jeffrey J Adams; Jonathan W Dickerson; Daniel H Remke; Pedro M Garcia-Barrantes; Darren W Engers; Julie L Engers; Sichen Chang; Jarrett J Foster; Anna L Blobaum; Colleen M Niswender; Carrie K Jones; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.418

6.  The unconventional activation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4R by diverse ligands.

Authors:  Jingjing Wang; Meng Wu; Zhangcheng Chen; Lijie Wu; Tian Wang; Dongmei Cao; Huan Wang; Shenhui Liu; Yueming Xu; Fei Li; Junlin Liu; Na Chen; Suwen Zhao; Jianjun Cheng; Sheng Wang; Tian Hua
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Live-cell microscopy or fluorescence anisotropy with budded baculoviruses-which way to go with measuring ligand binding to M4 muscarinic receptors?

Authors:  Maris-Johanna Tahk; Jane Torp; Mohammed A S Ali; Dmytro Fishman; Leopold Parts; Lukas Grätz; Christoph Müller; Max Keller; Santa Veiksina; Tõnis Laasfeld; Ago Rinken
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Heterodimerization of Dibenzodiazepinone-Type Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Ligands Leads to Increased M2R Affinity and Selectivity.

Authors:  Xueke She; Andrea Pegoli; Judith Mayr; Harald Hübner; Günther Bernhardt; Peter Gmeiner; Max Keller
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-10-16

9.  A new mechanism of allostery in a G protein-coupled receptor dimer.

Authors:  J Robert Lane; Prashant Donthamsetti; Jeremy Shonberg; Christopher J Draper-Joyce; Samuel Dentry; Mayako Michino; Lei Shi; Laura López; Peter J Scammells; Ben Capuano; Patrick M Sexton; Jonathan A Javitch; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Bitopic Binding Mode of an M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonist Associated with Adverse Clinical Trial Outcomes.

Authors:  Sophie J Bradley; Colin Molloy; Christoffer Bundgaard; Adrian J Mogg; Karen J Thompson; Louis Dwomoh; Helen E Sanger; Michael D Crabtree; Simon M Brooke; Patrick M Sexton; Christian C Felder; Arthur Christopoulos; Lisa M Broad; Andrew B Tobin; Christopher J Langmead
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.436

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.