Babafemi Taiwo1, Edward P Acosta, Patrick Ryscavage, Baiba Berzins, Darlene Lu, Jay Lalezari, Jose Castro, Oluwatoyin Adeyemi, Daniel R Kuritzkes, Joseph J Eron, Athe Tsibris, Susan Swindells. 1. *Division of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; †Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; ‡University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; §Statistical and Data Analysis Section, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; ‖Quest Clinical Research, San Francisco, CA; ¶Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Miami, Miami, FL; #CORE Center, Chicago, IL; **Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; ††Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and ‡‡Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To address the need for nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens, we explored the virologic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of maraviroc plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir in a single-arm, open-label, 96-week study. METHODS: Twenty-four antiretroviral-naive R5 HIV-1-infected participants received maraviroc 150 mg and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg (MVC/DRV/r) once daily. The primary outcome was virologic failure (VF) = confirmed viral load (VL) >50 copies per milliliter at week 24 in the modified intent-to-treat population. To determine viral dynamics, participant-specific first- and second-phase empirical Bayes estimates were compared with decay rates from efavirenz (EFV) plus lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus 2NRTIs, and EFV plus 2NRTIs. Maraviroc plasma concentrations were determined at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48. RESULTS: Baseline median (Q1, Q3) CD4 count and VL were 455 (299, 607) cells per cubic millimeter and 4.62 (4.18, 4.80) log10 copies per milliliter, respectively. VF occurred in 3 of 24 participants {12.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7 to 32.4]} at week 24. One of these resuppressed, yielding a week 48 VF rate of 2/24 [8.3% (95% CI: 1.0 to 27.0)]. The week 48 failures were 2 of the 4 participants (50%) with baseline VL >100,000 copies per milliliter. Week 96 VF rate was 2/20 [10% (95% CI: 1.2 to 31.7)]. Phase 1 decay was faster with MVC/DRV/r than reported for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus 2NRTIs (P = 0.0063) and similar to EFV-based regimens. Individual maraviroc trough concentrations collected between 20 and 28 hours post dose (n = 59) was 13.7 to 130 ng/mL (Q1, 23.4 ng/mL; Q3, 46.5 ng/mL), and modeled steady-state concentration was 128 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: MVC/DRV/r 150/800/100 mg once daily has potential for treatment-naive patients with R5 HIV-1.
OBJECTIVE: To address the need for nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens, we explored the virologic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of maraviroc plus ritonavir-boosted darunavir in a single-arm, open-label, 96-week study. METHODS: Twenty-four antiretroviral-naive R5 HIV-1-infectedparticipants received maraviroc 150 mg and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg (MVC/DRV/r) once daily. The primary outcome was virologic failure (VF) = confirmed viral load (VL) >50 copies per milliliter at week 24 in the modified intent-to-treat population. To determine viral dynamics, participant-specific first- and second-phase empirical Bayes estimates were compared with decay rates from efavirenz (EFV) plus lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus 2NRTIs, and EFV plus 2NRTIs. Maraviroc plasma concentrations were determined at weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48. RESULTS: Baseline median (Q1, Q3) CD4 count and VL were 455 (299, 607) cells per cubic millimeter and 4.62 (4.18, 4.80) log10 copies per milliliter, respectively. VF occurred in 3 of 24 participants {12.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7 to 32.4]} at week 24. One of these resuppressed, yielding a week 48 VF rate of 2/24 [8.3% (95% CI: 1.0 to 27.0)]. The week 48 failures were 2 of the 4 participants (50%) with baseline VL >100,000 copies per milliliter. Week 96 VF rate was 2/20 [10% (95% CI: 1.2 to 31.7)]. Phase 1 decay was faster with MVC/DRV/r than reported for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir plus 2NRTIs (P = 0.0063) and similar to EFV-based regimens. Individual maraviroc trough concentrations collected between 20 and 28 hours post dose (n = 59) was 13.7 to 130 ng/mL (Q1, 23.4 ng/mL; Q3, 46.5 ng/mL), and modeled steady-state concentration was 128 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: MVC/DRV/r 150/800/100 mg once daily has potential for treatment-naive patients with R5 HIV-1.
Authors: M A Polis; I A Sidorov; C Yoder; S Jankelevich; J Metcalf; B U Mueller; M A Dimitrov; P Pizzo; R Yarchoan; D S Dimitrov Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-11-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Daniel R Kuritzkes; Heather J Ribaudo; Kathleen E Squires; Susan L Koletar; Jorge Santana; Sharon A Riddler; Richard Reichman; Cecilia Shikuma; William A Meyer; Karin L Klingman; Roy M Gulick Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Brookie M Best; Scott L Letendre; Eileen Brigid; David B Clifford; Ann C Collier; Benjamin B Gelman; Justin C McArthur; J Allen McCutchan; David M Simpson; Ronald Ellis; Edmund V Capparelli; Igor Grant Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Roberto Ortiz; Edwin Dejesus; Homayoon Khanlou; Evgeniy Voronin; Jan van Lunzen; Jaime Andrade-Villanueva; Jan Fourie; Sandra De Meyer; Martine De Pauw; Eric Lefebvre; Tony Vangeneugden; Sabrina Spinosa-Guzman Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Sharon A Riddler; Richard Haubrich; A Gregory DiRienzo; Lynne Peeples; William G Powderly; Karin L Klingman; Kevin W Garren; Tania George; James F Rooney; Barbara Brizz; Umesh G Lalloo; Robert L Murphy; Susan Swindells; Diane Havlir; John W Mellors Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Athe M N Tsibris; Manish Sagar; Roy M Gulick; Zhaohui Su; Michael Hughes; Wayne Greaves; Mani Subramanian; Charles Flexner; Françoise Giguel; Kay E Leopold; Eoin Coakley; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Roy M Gulick; Jacob Lalezari; James Goodrich; Nathan Clumeck; Edwin DeJesus; Andrzej Horban; Jeffrey Nadler; Bonaventura Clotet; Anders Karlsson; Michael Wohlfeiler; John B Montana; Mary McHale; John Sullivan; Caroline Ridgway; Steve Felstead; Michael W Dunne; Elna van der Ryst; Howard Mayer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Borja Mora-Peris; Adam Croucher; Laura J Else; Jaime H Vera; Saye Khoo; George Scullard; David Back; Alan Winston Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink; Eric Le Fevre; Andrew Carr; Michael S Saag; Geoffrey Mukwaya; Silvia Nozza; Srinivas Rao Valluri; Manoli Vourvahis; Alex R Rinehart; Lynn McFadyen; Carl Fichtenbaum; Andrew Clark; Charles Craig; Annie F Fang; Jayvant Heera Journal: AIDS Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Manoli Vourvahis; Lynn McFadyen; Sunil Nepal; Srinivas Rao Valluri; Annie Fang; Gwendolyn D Fate; Linda S Wood; Jean-Claude Marshall; Phylinda L S Chan; Angus Nedderman; Julian Haynes; Mark E Savage; Andrew Clark; Kimberly Y Smith; Jayvant Heera Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 3.126