AIMS/HYPOTHESES: Despite oral hypoglycaemic medications being the most commonly used pharmacological treatments for type 2 diabetes, research is limited on their comparative safety, particularly their effects on overall mortality. We compared mortality risk with monotherapy initiation of four oral hypoglycaemic medications in a nationwide cohort of US veterans with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We identified new users of oral hypoglycaemic medication monotherapy between 2004 and 2009 who received care for at least 1 year from the Veterans Health Administration.Patients were followed until initial monotherapy discontinuation,addition of another diabetes pharmacotherapy, death or end of follow-up. Mortality HRs were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Among new users of metformin, sulfonylureas and rosiglitazone (185,360 men, 7,812 women), 4,256 (2.2%) died during follow-up. Average duration of medication use ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 years. Significantly higher mortality risk was seen for glibenclamide (known as glyburide in the USA and Canada) (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27, 1.50) or glipizide (HR 1.55,95% CI 1.43, 1.67) compared with metformin monotherapy,and for glipizide compared with rosiglitazone (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01, 1.59) or glibenclamide monotherapy (HR 1.12, 95%CI 1.02, 1.23). A significant sex–rosiglitazone interaction was seen (p=0.034) compared with metformin monotherapy, with women having a higher HR (HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.34, 14.20)than men (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95, 1.49). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: Significantly higher mortality was associated with glibenclamide, glipizide and rosiglitazone use compared with metformin, and with glipizide use compared with rosiglitazone or glibenclamide. The potential for residual confounding by indication should be considered in interpreting these results.
AIMS/HYPOTHESES: Despite oral hypoglycaemic medications being the most commonly used pharmacological treatments for type 2 diabetes, research is limited on their comparative safety, particularly their effects on overall mortality. We compared mortality risk with monotherapy initiation of four oral hypoglycaemic medications in a nationwide cohort of US veterans with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We identified new users of oral hypoglycaemic medication monotherapy between 2004 and 2009 who received care for at least 1 year from the Veterans Health Administration.Patients were followed until initial monotherapy discontinuation,addition of another diabetes pharmacotherapy, death or end of follow-up. Mortality HRs were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Among new users of metformin, sulfonylureas and rosiglitazone (185,360 men, 7,812 women), 4,256 (2.2%) died during follow-up. Average duration of medication use ranged from 1.4 to 1.7 years. Significantly higher mortality risk was seen for glibenclamide (known as glyburide in the USA and Canada) (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.27, 1.50) or glipizide (HR 1.55,95% CI 1.43, 1.67) compared with metformin monotherapy,and for glipizide compared with rosiglitazone (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.01, 1.59) or glibenclamide monotherapy (HR 1.12, 95%CI 1.02, 1.23). A significant sex–rosiglitazone interaction was seen (p=0.034) compared with metformin monotherapy, with women having a higher HR (HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.34, 14.20)than men (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.95, 1.49). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS: Significantly higher mortality was associated with glibenclamide, glipizide and rosiglitazone use compared with metformin, and with glipizide use compared with rosiglitazone or glibenclamide. The potential for residual confounding by indication should be considered in interpreting these results.
Authors: Azim S Gangji; Tali Cukierman; Hertzel C Gerstein; Charles H Goldsmith; Catherine M Clase Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Alan J Garber; Daniel S Donovan; Paresh Dandona; Simon Bruce; Jong-Soon Park Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christianne L Roumie; Adriana M Hung; Robert A Greevy; Carlos G Grijalva; Xulei Liu; Harvey J Murff; Tom A Elasy; Marie R Griffin Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Philip D Home; Stuart J Pocock; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Paula S Curtis; Ramon Gomis; Markolf Hanefeld; Nigel P Jones; Michel Komajda; John J V McMurray Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Craig J Currie; Chris D Poole; Sara Jenkins-Jones; Edwin A M Gale; Jeffrey A Johnson; Christopher Ll Morgan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Zachary A Marcum; Christopher W Forsberg; Kathryn P Moore; Ian H de Boer; Nicholas L Smith; Edward J Boyko; James S Floyd Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Vijaya Kancherla; John L Elliott; Birju B Patel; N Wilson Holland; Theodore M Johnson; Anjali Khakharia; Lawrence S Phillips; Godfrey P Oakley; Camille P Vaughan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Monica C Serra; Vijaya Kancherla; Anjali Khakharia; Latricia L Allen; Lawrence S Phillips; Mary K Rhee; Peter W F Wilson; Camille P Vaughan Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: James S Floyd; Marc Blondon; Kathryn P Moore; Edward J Boyko; Nicholas L Smith Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 2.890