Literature DB >> 23797410

Weak vertical canopy gradients of photosynthetic capacities and stomatal responses in a fertile Norway spruce stand.

Lasse Tarvainen, Göran Wallin, Johan Uddling.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of carbon (C) assimilation to within-canopy nitrogen (N) allocation and of stomatal conductance (g s) to environmental variables were investigated along a vertical canopy gradient in a fertile Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] stand. Maximum rates of ribulose bisphosphate-saturated carboxylation (V (cmax)) and electron transport (J (max)) exhibited weak relationships with needle N content. Using these relationships together with a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model, it was found that the sensitivity of C assimilation of 12 1-year old shoots to within-canopy N allocation pattern was very weak. Modelled C assimilation based on optimal compared to observed N allocation pattern increased by only 1-2 %, and altering total needle N content by ± 30 % resulted in a 2-4 % change in modelled C assimilation. C assimilation was more sensitive to water use and changed by 8-12 % in response to ± 30 % altered stomatal conductance. No indications of significant limitations of photosynthesis by other nutrients or non-optimal within-canopy allocation of water were detected. The sensitivity of g s to photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was found to be stronger in the lower canopy, while no significant within-canopy variation was observed in light-saturated g( s) or stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit (VPD). The results of this study show that, at this N rich site, photosynthesis integrated for shoots at different canopy positions is only marginally affected by N allocation pattern and that increased stand-scale N availability would only be truly beneficial to canopy photosynthesis if it resulted in increased leaf area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23797410     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2703-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  31 in total

1.  Optimality and nitrogen allocation in a tree canopy.

Authors:  D Y Hollinger
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Experimental evidence supporting the concept of light-mediated modulation of stem hydraulic conductance.

Authors:  Arne Sellin; Eele Õunapuu; Annika Karusion
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems.

Authors:  Todd E Dawson; Stephen S O Burgess; Kevin P Tu; Rafael S Oliveira; Louis S Santiago; Joshua B Fisher; Kevin A Simonin; Anthony R Ambrose
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 4.  Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests.

Authors:  Gordon B Bonan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Is analysing the nitrogen use at the plant canopy level a matter of choosing the right optimization criterion?

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Heinjo J During
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Why does leaf nitrogen decline within tree canopies less rapidly than light? An explanation from optimization subject to a lower bound on leaf mass per area.

Authors:  Roderick C Dewar; Lasse Tarvainen; Kathryn Parker; Göran Wallin; Ross E McMurtrie
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 7.  Leaf canopy as a dynamic system: ecophysiology and optimality in leaf turnover.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Contrasting effects of wood ash application on microbial community structure, biomass and processes in drained forested peatlands.

Authors:  Robert G Björk; Maria Ernfors; Ulf Sikström; Mats B Nilsson; Mats X Andersson; Tobias Rütting; Leif Klemedtsson
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  Within-canopy nitrogen and photosynthetic gradients are unaffected by soil fertility in field-grown Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  Tarryn L Turnbull; Natalie Kelly; Mark A Adams; Charles R Warren
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.

Authors:  S von Caemmerer; G D Farquhar
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Optimality of nitrogen distribution among leaves in plant canopies.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  A meta-analysis of leaf nitrogen distribution within plant canopies.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka; Niels P R Anten; Almaz Borjigidai; Chiho Kamiyama; Hidemitsu Sakai; Toshihiro Hasegawa; Shimpei Oikawa; Atsuhiro Iio; Makoto Watanabe; Takayoshi Koike; Kazuya Nishina; Akihiko Ito
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Increased Needle Nitrogen Contents Did Not Improve Shoot Photosynthetic Performance of Mature Nitrogen-Poor Scots Pine Trees.

Authors:  Lasse Tarvainen; Martina Lutz; Mats Räntfors; Torgny Näsholm; Göran Wallin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Dynamic spatial patterns of leaf traits affect total respiration on the crown scale.

Authors:  Xiaolin Wang; Hongxuan Zhou; Fengsen Han; Yuanzheng Li; Dan Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment.

Authors:  Nicholas G Smith; Trevor F Keenan; I Colin Prentice; Han Wang; Ian J Wright; Ülo Niinemets; Kristine Y Crous; Tomas F Domingues; Rossella Guerrieri; F Yoko Ishida; Jens Kattge; Eric L Kruger; Vincent Maire; Alistair Rogers; Shawn P Serbin; Lasse Tarvainen; Henrique F Togashi; Philip A Townsend; Meng Wang; Lasantha K Weerasinghe; Shuang-Xi Zhou
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 9.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.