| Literature DB >> 23797386 |
T S McMillen1, E Minami, R C Leboeuf.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity has become an epidemic in many countries and is supporting a billion dollar industry involved in promoting weight loss through diet, exercise and surgical procedures. Because of difficulties in maintaining body weight reduction, a pattern of weight cycling often occurs (so called 'yo-yo' dieting) that may result in deleterious outcomes to health. There is controversy about cardiovascular benefits of yo-yo dieting, and an animal model is needed to better understand the contributions of major diet and body weight changes on heart and vascular functions. Our purpose is to determine the effects of weight cycling on cardiac function and atherosclerosis development in a mouse model.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23797386 PMCID: PMC3697407 DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2013.19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Diabetes ISSN: 2044-4052 Impact factor: 5.097
Figure 1Body weight and body composition. Mice were divided into three groups and either maintained on rodent chow (CHOW), a high-fat-high sucrose diet (HFHS) or fed alternately between the two diets (YOYO). Diet compositions are given in the text. (a) Body weight for mice fed test diets for a duration of 29 weeks. (b) Body composition in terms of actual (g) and relative (%) body weight and fat and lean mass at necropsy (29 weeks) as described in the text. For all panels, n=4–8 per group and data are presented as mean±s.e.m.; *P<0.05 between CHOW and YOYO groups; †P<0.05 between CHOW and HFHS; ‡P<0.05 between HFHS and YOYO.
Figure 2Glucose homeostasis for HFHS, YOYO and CHOW groups of mice. (a) Interperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) performed at 22 weeks of diet feeding and (b) data are compared as area under the curve (AUC) for the IPGTT results. (c) Insulin sensitivity test (IST) performed at 24 weeks of diet feeding and (d) IST results presented as AUC. Blood glucose levels were measured after a 4-h fast (n=4–8 per group) and data are presented as mean±s.e.m. Significant differences between groups are shown in the AUC curves.
Plasma lipids, glucose and insulin levels, as well as assessments of insulin resistance (glucose/insulin and HOMA-IR)
| Glucose (mg dl−1) | 187±6.4*,# | 151±12.0 | 122±3.9 |
| Insulin (ng ml−1) | 6.7±1.5*,# | 2.2±0.4 | 1.3±0.1 |
| G/I ratio | 36.1±7.5*,# | 75.7±12.5 | 97.6±13.0 |
| HOMA | 5.32±0.04*,# | 1.41±0.02 | 0.67±0.01 |
| Total cholesterol (mg dl−1) | 741±16.1*,# | 369±13.4† | 310±26.2 |
| Triglyceride (mg dl−1) | 262±29.6*,# | 105±7.3 | 98±13.4 |
Abbreviations: HFHS, high-fat/high-sucrose; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment scores of insulin resistance.
Plasma was taken from mice fasted for 4 h in the morning at time of necropsy (29 weeks).
*P<0.05 between HFHS and YOYO.
#P<0.05 between HFHS and CHOW.
†P<0.05 between YOYO and CHOW.
Data are presented as mean±s.e.m.
Figure 3Plasma lipoprotein profiles for HFHS, YOYO and CHOW groups of mice. Plasma was taken following a 4-h fast at necropsy (29 weeks of diet feeding) and processed as described in the text. Fast performance liquid chromatography (FPLC) was performed as described in the text. (a) HFHS feeding resulted in an elevated very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL cholesterol, with a reduction in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol as compared with YOYO and CHOW animals. (b) VLDL triglyceride levels were elevated in HFHS mice as compared with the other groups.
Figure 4Cardiac function measures for HFHS, YOYO and CHOW mice. (a) Systolic and diastolic left ventricular end diameters, (b) fractional shortening and (c) ejection fraction (EF) are shown for mice at 26 weeks of diet feeding. N=4–8 per group and significant changes are shown in the figure. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. For (a), *P<0.05 between YOYO and CHOW and †P<0.05 between HFHS and CHOW.
Figure 5Atherosclerosis quantification for the three groups of mice. (a) Hearts were collected at necropsy and processed for quantification of aortic root atherosclerosis as described in the text. (b) Aortas (thoracic and abdominal) were cleaned of adventitial tissue and processed for en face quantification of lesion sizes as described in the text. N=4–8 and *P<0.05 between groups. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m.