OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists surrounding the contribution of fitness and adiposity as determinants of the Metabolically Healthy Overweight(MHO) phenotype in youth. This study investigated the independent contribution of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity to the MHO phenotype among overweight and obese youth. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 108 overweight and obese youth classified as MHO (no cardiometabolic risk factors) or non-MHO (≥1 cardiometabolic risk factor), based on age- and gender specific cut-points for fasting glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and hepaticsteatosis. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of overweight and obese youth were classified as MHO. This phenotype was associated with lower BMIz-score (BMI z-score: 1.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.4, P = .02) and waist circumference (99.7 ± 13.2 vs 106.1 ± 13.7 cm, P = .04) compared with non-MHO youth. When matched for fitness level and stratified by BMI z-score (1.6 ± 0.3 vs 2.4 ± 0.2), the prevalence of MHO was four fold higher in the low BMI z-score group (27% vs 7%; P = .03).Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that the best predictor of MHO was the absence of hepatic steatosis even after adjusting for waist circumference (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40–0.80) or BMI z-score (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The MHO phenotype was present in 25% of overweight and obese youth and is strongly associated with lower levels of adiposity,and the absence of hepatic steatosis, but not with cardiorespiratory fitness.
OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists surrounding the contribution of fitness and adiposity as determinants of the Metabolically Healthy Overweight(MHO) phenotype in youth. This study investigated the independent contribution of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity to the MHO phenotype among overweight and obese youth. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 108 overweight and obese youth classified as MHO (no cardiometabolic risk factors) or non-MHO (≥1 cardiometabolic risk factor), based on age- and gender specific cut-points for fasting glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and hepaticsteatosis. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of overweight and obese youth were classified as MHO. This phenotype was associated with lower BMIz-score (BMI z-score: 1.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.4, P = .02) and waist circumference (99.7 ± 13.2 vs 106.1 ± 13.7 cm, P = .04) compared with non-MHO youth. When matched for fitness level and stratified by BMI z-score (1.6 ± 0.3 vs 2.4 ± 0.2), the prevalence of MHO was four fold higher in the low BMI z-score group (27% vs 7%; P = .03).Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that the best predictor of MHO was the absence of hepatic steatosis even after adjusting for waist circumference (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40–0.80) or BMI z-score (odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.43–0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The MHO phenotype was present in 25% of overweight and obese youth and is strongly associated with lower levels of adiposity,and the absence of hepatic steatosis, but not with cardiorespiratory fitness.
Authors: Jennifer A Woo Baidal; Erin E Elbel; Joel E Lavine; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Matthew W Gillman; Emily Oken; Elsie M Taveras Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Yang Du; Tao Zhang; Dianjianyi Sun; Changwei Li; Lydia Bazzano; Lu Qi; Marie Krousel-Wood; Jiang He; Paul K Whelton; Wei Chen; Shengxu Li Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jennifer A Woo Baidal; Erika R Cheng; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Emily Oken; Matthew W Gillman; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Nicholas Kuzik; Valerie Carson; Lars Bo Andersen; Luís B Sardinha; Anders Grøntved; Bjørge Herman Hansen; Ulf Ekelund Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Francisco Jesús Llorente-Cantarero; Rosaura Leis; Azahara I Rupérez; Augusto Anguita-Ruiz; Rocío Vázquez-Cobela; Katherine Flores-Rojas; Esther M González-Gil; Concepción M Aguilera; Luis A Moreno; Mercedes Gil-Campos; Gloria Bueno Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-04-12