Literature DB >> 23796627

Quality and safety implications of emergency department information systems.

Heather L Farley1, Kevin M Baumlin, Azita G Hamedani, Dickson S Cheung, Michael R Edwards, Drew C Fuller, Nicholas Genes, Richard T Griffey, John J Kelly, James C McClay, Jeff Nielson, Michael P Phelan, Jason S Shapiro, Suzanne Stone-Griffith, Jesse M Pines.   

Abstract

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services "meaningful use" incentive programs, in tandem with the boundless additional requirements for detailed reporting of quality metrics, have galvanized hospital efforts to implement hospital-based electronic health records. As such, emergency department information systems (EDISs) are an important and unique component of most hospitals' electronic health records. System functionality varies greatly and affects physician decisionmaking, clinician workflow, communication, and, ultimately, the overall quality of care and patient safety. This article is a joint effort by members of the Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Section and the Informatics Section of the American College of Emergency Physicians. The aim of this effort is to examine the benefits and potential threats to quality and patient safety that could result from the choice of a particular EDIS, its implementation and optimization, and the hospital's or physician group's approach to continuous improvement of the EDIS. Specifically, we explored the following areas of potential EDIS safety concerns: communication failure, wrong order-wrong patient errors, poor data display, and alert fatigue. Case studies are presented that illustrate the potential harm that could befall patients from an inferior EDIS product or suboptimal execution of such a product in the clinical environment. The authors have developed 7 recommendations to improve patient safety with respect to the deployment of EDISs. These include ensuring that emergency providers actively participate in selection of the EDIS product, in the design of processes related to EDIS implementation and optimization, and in the monitoring of the system's ongoing success or failure. Our recommendations apply to emergency departments using any type of EDIS: custom-developed systems, best-of-breed vendor systems, or enterprise systems.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23796627      PMCID: PMC3880777          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  22 in total

1.  Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Brian L Strom; Rita Schinnar; Faten Aberra; Warren Bilker; Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Eric Pifer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-27

3.  Health care information technology vendors' "hold harmless" clause: implications for patients and clinicians.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; David Kreda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Unintended errors with EHR-based result management: a case series.

Authors:  Thomas R Yackel; Peter J Embi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Transformation of Emergency Department processes of care with EHR, CPOE, and ER event tracking systems.

Authors:  Smruti Vartak; Donald K Crandall; Jane M Brokel; Douglas S Wakefield; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.185

6.  Health information system implementation: a qualitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bahlol Rahimi; Vivian Vimarlund; Toomas Timpka
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Using information technology to improve the quality and safety of emergency care.

Authors:  Daniel A Handel; Robert L Wears; Larry A Nathanson; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities.

Authors:  Ben-Tzion Karsh; Matthew B Weinger; Patricia A Abbott; Robert L Wears
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable measurement tools remain elusive.

Authors:  Emily S Patterson; Robert L Wears
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-02

10.  Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference.

Authors:  Meryl Bloomrosen; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  19 in total

1.  Electronic Health Record Documentation Times among Emergency Medicine Trainees.

Authors:  Scott Crawford; Igor Kushner; Radosveta Wells; Stormy Monks
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-01-01

2.  Clinical Informatics Training During Emergency Medicine Residency: The University of Michigan Experience.

Authors:  Robert W Turer; Miguel Arribas; Sarah M Balgord; Stephanie Brooks; Laura R Hopson; Benjamin S Bassin; Richard Medlin
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-09-14

3.  Emergency physicians' attitudes and preferences regarding computed tomography, radiation exposure, and imaging decision support.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Donna B Jeffe; Thomas Bailey
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Design and Evaluation of an Integrated, Patient-Focused Electronic Health Record Display for Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Xiaomei Wang; Tracy C Kim; Sudeep Hegde; Daniel J Hoffman; Natalie C Benda; Ella S Franklin; David Lavergne; Shawna J Perry; Rollin J Fairbanks; A Zachary Hettinger; Emilie M Roth; Ann M Bisantz
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  The Role of Clinical Pharmacists in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Brenna M Farmer; Bryan D Hayes; Rama Rao; Natalija Farrell; Lewis Nelson
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-10-26

6.  The Impact of a Location-Sensing Electronic Health Record on Clinician Efficiency and Accuracy: A Pilot Simulation Study.

Authors:  Kevin King; John Quarles; Vaishnavi Ravi; Tanvir Irfan Chowdhury; Donia Friday; Craig Sisson; Yusheng Feng
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Text message alerts to emergency physicians identifying potential study candidates increase clinical trial enrollment.

Authors:  Laura E Simon; Adina S Rauchwerger; Uli K Chettipally; Leon Babakhanian; David R Vinson; E Margaret Warton; Mary E Reed; Anupam B Kharbanda; Elyse O Kharbanda; Dustin W Ballard
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Varying rates of patient identity verification when using computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Emilie Fortman; A Zachary Hettinger; Jessica L Howe; Allan Fong; Zoe Pruitt; Kristen Miller; Raj M Ratwani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users.

Authors:  Sari Palojoki; Tuuli Pajunen; Kaija Saranto; Lasse Lehtonen
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-06

10.  Management of information within emergencies departments in developing countries: analysis at the National Emergency Department in Benin.

Authors:  Yolaine Glèlè Ahanhanzo; Alphonse Kpozehouen; Ghislain Sopoh; Charles Sossa-Jérôme; Laurent Ouedraogo; Michèle Wilmet-Dramaix
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.