Preventing diabetes blindness: cost effectiveness of a screening programme using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy in a primary health care setting in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: South Africa like many other developing countries is experiencing an epidemiologic transition with a marked increase in the non-communicable disease (NCD) burden. Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of incidental blindness in adults. A screening programme using a mobile fundal camera in a primary care setting has been shown to be effective in the country. Information on affordability and cost is essential for policymakers to consider its adoption.
METHODS: Economic evaluation is the comparative analysis of competing alternative interventions in terms of costs and consequences. A cost effectiveness analysis was done using actual costs from the primary care screening programme.
RESULTS: A total of 14,541 patients were screened in three primary healthcare facilities in the Western Cape. Photographs were taken by a trained technician with supervision by an ophthalmic nurse. The photographs were then read by a medical officer with ophthalmic experience. A cost effective ratio of $1206 per blindness case averted was obtained. This included costs for screening and treating an individual. The cost just to screen a patient for retinopathy was $22. The costs of screening and treating all incident cases of blindness due to diabetes in South Africa would be 168,000,000 ZAR ($19,310,344) per annum.
CONCLUSION: Non mydriatic digital fundoscopy is a cost effective measure in the screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting in South Africa. The major savings in the long term are a result of avoiding government disability grant for people who suffer loss of vision.