Literature DB >> 23796293

Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.

Ken Deal1, Deborah Marshall, Dominika Dabrowski, Alina Charter, Margaret Bukoski, Paul Moayyedi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess patients' preferences and estimate willingness to pay (WTP) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatments.
METHOD: Patients were randomly selected from a multicenter clinical study to participate in the discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. Relevant treatment attributes were identified through literature review, clinical expert consultation, and focus groups. The DCE included 14 choice tasks composed of six attributes, three treatment profiles, and a "none"option considering orthogonality, D-efficiency, and level balance, while keeping patient response burden reasonable. Individual-level preferences and WTP were estimated by aggregate-level conditional logit and hierarchical Bayes analyses.
RESULTS: Our sample of 361, drawn from a clinical trial, had a mean age of 57 years, were primarily women (53%), and rated their GERD symptoms as mild/moderate (31%) and moderately severe/severe (7%). Most important attributes of GERD treatment were (in order) as follows: avoiding side effects, sleeping discomfort, daytime discomfort, dietary changes, medication cost, and treatment frequency. Simulations found that patients are willing to pay an additional US $36 to reduce susceptibility to side effects from moderate to mild or to decrease the frequency of sleeping discomfort. Patients 65 years or older were willing to pay less for daytime discomfort relief, while women would pay more to avoid sleeping discomfort.
CONCLUSIONS: Key factors concerning patients with GERD and their preference for treatment features to control GERD symptoms were confirmed. A DCE estimated WTP by GERD sufferers for relief from symptoms and avoidance of side effects using relevant treatment costs. These findings may help guide clinical treatment decisions for individual patients to improve GERD symptom control.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23796293     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  4 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Health-care Workers' Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccines in Eastern Ethiopia: Using Contingent Valuation Method.

Authors:  Bedasa Taye Merga; Galana Mamo Ayana; Belay Negash; Addisu Alemu; Mohammed Abdurke; Ahmedmenewer Abdu; Bikila Balis; Miressa Bekana; Gelana Fekadu; Temam Beshir Raru
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Patient trade-offs between continuity and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics in Canada: a cross-sectional survey using discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Doug Oliver; Ken Deal; Michelle Howard; Helen Qian; Gina Agarwal; Dale Guenter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.