Literature DB >> 23796204

Commentary on "Phase II trial of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with advanced urothelial tract carcinoma." Wong YN, Litwin S, Vaughn D, Cohen S, Plimack ER, Lee J, Song W, Dabrow M, Brody M, Tuttle H, Hudes G, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: J Clin Oncol 2012;30(28):3545-51 [Epub 2012 Aug 27].

Ashish M Kamat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The benefit of salvage chemotherapy is modest in metastatic urothelial cancer. We conducted a randomized, noncomparative phase II study to measure the efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with previously treated urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who received one line of chemotherapy in the perioperative or metastatic setting were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) per week. We used early progression as an indicator of futility. Either arm would close if seven of the initial 15 patients in that arm progressed at the first disease evaluation at 8 weeks.
RESULTS: We enrolled 39 evaluable patients. The single-agent cetuximab arm closed after nine of the first 11 patients progressed by 8 weeks. The combination arm completed the full accrual of 28 patients, of whom 22 patients (78.5%) had visceral disease. Twelve of 28 patients had progression-free survival greater than 16 weeks. The overall response rate was 25% (95% CI, 11% to 45%; three complete responses and four partial responses). The median progression-free survival was 16.4 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 25.1 weeks), and the median overall survival was 42 weeks (95% CI, 30.4 to 78 weeks). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients were rash (six cases), fatigue (five cases), and low magnesium (three cases).
CONCLUSION: Although it had limited activity as a single agent, cetuximab appears to augment the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in previously treated urothelial cancers. The cetuximab and paclitaxel combination merits additional study to establish its role in the treatment of urothelial cancers.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23796204     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  4 in total

Review 1.  Emerging agents for the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Whi An Kwon; Ho Kyung Seo
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

2.  LSD1/KDM1 isoform LSD1+8a contributes to neural differentiation in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Takanobu Jotatsu; Shigehiro Yagishita; Ken Tajima; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Kaoru Mogushi; Moulid Hidayat; Aditya Wirawan; Ryo Ko; Ryota Kanemaru; Naoko Shimada; Keiko Mitani; Tsuyoshi Saito; Kazuya Takamochi; Kenji Suzuki; Shinji Kohsaka; Shinya Kojima; Hiroshi Mukae; Kazuhiro Yatera; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  siRNA-mediated knockdown of ID1 disrupts Nanog- and Oct-4-mediated cancer stem cell-likeness and resistance to chemotherapy in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Linlin Li; Xiaoyong Wei; Baofeng Wu; Yuanli Xiao; Mingzhu Yin; Qiaohong Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Postoperative Radiotherapy Improves Survival in Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma: a SEER Database Analysis.

Authors:  Feng Wei; Hongwei Lyu; Shuoer Wang; Yan Chu; Fengyuan Chen
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.720

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.