Literature DB >> 23796162

Test of an intervention to improve knowledge of women with intellectual disabilities about cervical and breast cancer screening.

J G Swaine1, S L Parish, K Luken, E Son, P Dickens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a critical need for evidence-based health education interventions for women with intellectual disabilities (IDs) to promote receipt of preventive health screenings. Previous research has established Women Be Healthy, an 8-week classroom-style intervention designed to teach women with IDs about breast and cervical cancer screenings, as a promising practice. However, additional research is needed to determine how to further improve screening-related knowledge gains. This study aimed to test a modified version of Women Be Healthy, Women Be Healthy 2, and compare its effectiveness in increasing knowledge gains to the original intervention.
METHOD: Women living in the community across one state in the United States were randomly assigned to a treatment (n = 98), delayed treatment, (n = 35), or no intervention group (n = 65). Women in the treatment group received Women Be Healthy, and women in the delayed treatment group received the modified Women Be Healthy 2. Baseline and post-intervention interviews were conducted to measure knowledge of cervical and breast cancer screening. Knowledge scores were compared across groups.
RESULTS: Among the nine knowledge items measured, one breast knowledge measure and one cervical knowledge measure showed statistically significant group differences; marginally significant differences were observed for two other knowledge measures. After adjusting for covariates, women who received Women Be Healthy 2 had increased knowledge overall compared with the women receiving no intervention.
CONCLUSION: Women Be Healthy 2 is promising, but additional efforts appear necessary to increase the knowledge women with IDs have about cervical and breast cancer screening.
© 2013 MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; intellectual disability; learning disability; methodology in research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23796162     DOI: 10.1111/jir.12062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  4 in total

1.  Global Outcome Trajectories After TBI Among Survivors and Nonsurvivors: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.

Authors:  Kristen Dams-OʼConnor; Christopher Pretz; Tausif Billah; Flora M Hammond; Cynthia Harrison-Felix
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.710

Review 2.  Are Researchers Addressing Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Among People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in the U.S.? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Grace Samtani; Tamsen L Bassford; Heather J Williamson; Julie S Armin
Journal:  Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2021-04-01

3.  Adapting a Cancer Screening Education Program for Native American Women with Disabilities.

Authors:  Julie S Armin; Heather J Williamson; Andria Begay; Jennifer Etcitty; Agnes Attakai; Kim Russell; Julie A Baldwin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Determining the need for a breast cancer awareness educational intervention for women with mild/moderate levels of intellectual disability: A qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Susan Walsh; Josephine Hegarty; Elaine Lehane; Dawn Farrell; Laurence Taggart; Louise Kelly; Laura Sahm; Maria Corrigan; Maria Caples; Anne Marie Martin; Sabin Tabirca; Mark A Corrigan; Mairin O'Mahony
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.328

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.