Literature DB >> 23795874

Buprenorphine treatment outcomes among opioid-dependent cocaine users and non-users.

Chinazo O Cunningham1, Angela Giovanniello, Hillary V Kunins, Robert J Roose, Aaron D Fox, Nancy L Sohler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: National treatment guidelines state that polysubstance users, including cocaine users, may not be appropriate candidates for office-based buprenorphine treatment. However, data to support this recommendation are sparse and conflicting, and the implications of this recommendation may include limiting the usefulness of buprenorphine treatment, as cocaine use is common among opioid-dependent individuals seeking buprenorphine treatment. We compared buprenorphine treatment outcomes (6-month treatment retention and self-reported opioid use over 6 months) in opioid-dependent cocaine users versus non-users who initiated buprenorphine treatment at an urban community health center.
METHODS: We followed 87 participants over 6 months, collecting interview and medical record data. We used logistic regression models to test whether baseline cocaine use was associated with treatment retention and mixed effects nonlinear models to test whether baseline cocaine use was associated with self-reported opioid use.
RESULTS: At baseline, 39.1% reported cocaine use. In all participants, self-reported opioid use decreased from 89.7% to 27.4% over 6 months, and 6-month treatment retention was 54.5%. We found no significant difference in 6-month treatment retention (AOR = 1.56, 95% CI: .58-4.17, p = .38) or self-reported opioid use (AOR = .89, 95% CI: .26-3.07, p = .85) between cocaine users and non-users. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that buprenorphine treatment retention is not worse in cocaine users than non-users, with clinically meaningful improvements in self-reported opioid use. These findings suggest that opioid-dependent cocaine users attain considerable benefits from office-based buprenorphine treatment and argue for the inclusion of these patients in office-based buprenorphine treatment programs.
Copyright © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795874      PMCID: PMC3694744          DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.12032.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Addict        ISSN: 1055-0496


  29 in total

1.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The impact of cocaine use on outcomes in HIV-infected patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone.

Authors:  Lynn E Sullivan; Michael Botsko; Chinazo O Cunningham; Patrick G O'Connor; David Hersh; Jennifer Mitty; Paula J Lum; Richard S Schottenfeld; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  The BHIVES collaborative: organization and evaluation of a multisite demonstration of integrated buprenorphine/naloxone and HIV treatment.

Authors:  Linda Weiss; James E Egan; Michael Botsko; Julie Netherland; David A Fiellin; Ruth Finkelstein
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  Prognostic factors in Buprenorphine- versus methadone-maintained patients.

Authors:  R S Schottenfeld; J R Pakes; T R Kosten
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  A trial of integrated buprenorphine/naloxone and HIV clinical care.

Authors:  Lynn E Sullivan; Declan Barry; Brent A Moore; Marek C Chawarski; Jeanette M Tetrault; Michael V Pantalon; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid-dependent cocaine users.

Authors:  E C Strain; M L Stitzer; I A Liebson; G E Bigelow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Pre- and in-treatment predictors of retention in methadone treatment using survival analysis.

Authors:  S Magura; P C Nwakeze; S Y Demsky
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Buprenorphine treatment in an urban community health center: what to expect.

Authors:  Chinazo Cunningham; Angela Giovanniello; Galit Sacajiu; Susan Whitley; Pamela Mund; Robert Beil; Nancy Sohler
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Buprenorphine: dose-related effects on cocaine and opioid use in cocaine-abusing opioid-dependent humans.

Authors:  R S Schottenfeld; J Pakes; D Ziedonis; T R Kosten
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1993 Jul 1-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  15-Year survival and retention of patients in a general hospital-affiliated methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) center in Israel.

Authors:  Einat Peles; Shaul Schreiber; Miriam Adelson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  8 in total

1.  Buprenorphine requires concomitant activation of NOP and MOP receptors to reduce cocaine consumption.

Authors:  Marsida Kallupi; Qianwei Shen; Giordano de Guglielmo; Dennis Yasuda; V Blair Journigan; Nurulain T Zaveri; Roberto Ciccocioppo
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Opioids and HIV Infection: From Pain Management to Addiction Treatment.

Authors:  Chinazo O Cunningham
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2018-04

3.  Same-day vs. delayed buprenorphine prescribing and patient retention in an office-based buprenorphine treatment program.

Authors:  Andrea Jakubowski; Tiffany Lu; Frank DiRenno; Benjamin Jadow; Angela Giovanniello; Shadi Nahvi; Chinazo Cunningham; Aaron Fox
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-09-22

4.  Retention of Patients With Multiple Vulnerabilities in a Federally Qualified Health Center Buprenorphine Program: Pennsylvania, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Lara Carson Weinstein; Qais Iqbal; Amy Cunningham; Robin Debates; Greg Landistratis; Patrick Doggett; Alexis Silverio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Comparisons of Cocaine-Only, Opioid-Only, and Users of Both Substances in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

Authors:  Robert F Leeman; Qisi Sun; Devorah Bogart; Cheryl L Beseler; Mehmet Sofuoglu
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  Low barrier buprenorphine treatment for persons experiencing homelessness and injecting heroin in San Francisco.

Authors:  Jamie Carter; Barry Zevin; Paula J Lum
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2019-05-06

7.  Impact of reduced restrictions on buprenorphine prescribing during COVID-19 among patients in a community-based treatment program.

Authors:  Kathleen M Ward; Ayden Scheim; Jonathan Wang; Benjamin Cocchiaro; Katie Singley; Alexis M Roth
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend Rep       Date:  2022-04-26

8.  Description and outcomes of a buprenorphine maintenance treatment program integrated within Prevention Point Philadelphia, an urban syringe exchange program.

Authors:  Marcus A Bachhuber; Cole Thompson; Ann Prybylowski; José Benitez; Silvana Mazzella; David Barclay
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.