Literature DB >> 23795785

Bone metastases in germ cell tumours: lessons learnt from a large retrospective study.

Mariam Jamal-Hanjani1, Anna Karpathakis, Amy Kwan, Danish Mazhar, Wendy Ansell, Jonathan Shamash, Peter Harper, Sarah Rudman, Thomas Powles, Simon Chowdhury.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of patients with germ cell cancer and bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The case records of patients with known germ cell tumours (GCTs) within the Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Group database between January 2005 and March 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected for histopathology, presence of bone metastases at diagnosis or relapse, site of bone metastases and imaging method used to confirm bone metastases, treatment received, response to treatment and overall survival. We present here the largest unselected cohort of bone metastases in patients with GCTs.
RESULTS: In all, 2550 cases of GCTs were reviewed and there was bone involvement in 19 cases. The primary site was either testicular (13/19), mediastinal (1/19) or unknown (5/19). Most cases were non-seminomatous GCTs (11/19, 58%) and only three cases of seminomatous GCTs (3/19, 16%) with five cases in which diagnosis was based on clinical history and significantly raised GCT markers (5/19, 26%). In all of these five cases β-human chorionic gonadotrophin was raised and in three α-fetoprotein was raised, consistent with non-seminomatous GCT. There were bone metastases at diagnosis (0.51%, 13/2550) or at relapse (0.24%, 6/2550). The sites of bone metastases were the vertebrae (15/19, 79%), pelvis (3/19, 16%), ribs (3/19, 16%) and femur (2/19, 11%). Ten patients (53%) had solitary, and nine patients (47%) had multiple, sites of bone metastases. In patients presenting with bone metastases at diagnosis compared with relapse, the mortality rate was 23% (3/13) and 50% (3/6), respectively. After receiving one line of chemotherapy, nine patients (47%) remained in remission not requiring further treatment, six (32%) required further chemotherapy due to subsequent relapse, three (16%) died after first-line chemotherapy and one was lost to follow-up. At the time of data collection and based on the last clinic follow-up, six patients (32%) had died with a median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up of 11.5 (4.3, 24.8) months and 10 (53%) remained alive with a median (IQR) follow-up of 26 (13.5, 48) months Three patients were lost to follow-up. Of the known patients alive, eight (42%) remained in remission and two (11%) had recurrent disease requiring further treatment.
CONCLUSION: Although bone disease in germ cell cancer is rare, awareness of this condition is important and there is a need for prospective evaluation of patient characteristics, treatment approaches and survival outcome in this group of patients.
© 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795785     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

1.  First salvage treatment of germ cell tumor patients with bone metastases: retrospective analysis of a large international database.

Authors:  Christoph Oing; Anja Lorch; Carsten Bokemeyer; Friedemann Honecker; Jörg Beyer; Lars Arne Berger; Karin Oechsle
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Site of extranodal metastasis impacts survival in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Nirmish Singla; Rashed A Ghandour; Yuval Freifeld; Joseph G Cheaib; Solomon L Woldu; Phillip M Pierorazio; Aditya Bagrodia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Postchemotherapy surgery for germ cell tumors--what have we learned in 35 years?

Authors:  Stephen B Riggs; Earl F Burgess; Kris E Gaston; Caroline A Merwarth; Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-09

4.  Mixed Germ Cell Tumor of Testis with Isolated Scapular Metastasis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dipti Rani Samanta; Chaitali Bose; Roopesh Krishnappa; Saumyaranjan Mishra; Sulagna Mohanty; Ashish Upadhyay; Surendra Nath Senapati
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2015-08-16

Review 5.  Impact of Non-Pulmonary Visceral Metastases in the Prognosis and Practice of Metastatic Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.

Authors:  Lorena Rossi; Filippo Martignano; Valentina Gallà; Antonio Maugeri; Giuseppe Schepisi
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2016-04-20

6.  18F-FDG PET/CT with unusual bone and CNS metastases from testicular seminoma.

Authors:  Francisco Javier García Gómez; Irene Acevedo Bánez; Roberto Lasso Vega González; Pedro Jiménez-Granero; Isabel Borrego Dorado
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Metastasis to the Jaw: An Imaging Case Report.

Authors:  Rita Olivia Siverino; Alessandra Uccello; Maria Luisa Giunta; Mario Uccello; Placido Amadio; Giuseppe Petrillo
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 0.212

8.  Non-seminomatous germ cell tumor with bone metastasis only at diagnosis: A rare clinical presentation.

Authors:  K C Biebighauser; Jianjun Gao; Priya Rao; Gene Landon; Lance Pagliaro; Colin P N Dinney; Jose Karam; Neema Navai
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-08-26

9.  A Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting the Risk of Developing to M1b Stage of Patients With Germ Cell Testicular Cancer.

Authors:  Li Ding; Kun Wang; Chi Zhang; Yang Zhang; Kanlirong Wang; Wang Li; Junqi Wang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29

10.  Development and validation of a nomogram to predict survival in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Dong-Dong Yu; Dong Hui; Wei-Kang Chen; Yun-Bei Xiao; Zhi-Gang Wu; Qin-Quan Wang; Chao-Feng Zhou; Zhi-Xia Chen; Cheng-Di Li; Jian Cai
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.