Literature DB >> 23795728

Considerations on safety and treatment of patients with chronic heart failure at high altitude.

Piergiuseppe Agostoni1.   

Abstract

Prognosis and quality of life of chronic heart failure (HF) patients have greatly improved over the last decade. Consequently, many patients are willing to spend leisure time at altitude, usually <3500 m, but their safety in doing so is undefined. HF is a syndrome that often has relevant co-morbidities, such as pulmonary hypertension, COPD, unstable cardiac ischemia, and anemia. HF co-morbidities may per se impede a safe stay at altitude. Exercise at simulated altitude is associated with a reduction in performance, which is greater in HF patients than in normal subjects and greater in patients with most severe HF. In normal subjects, the reduction in performance is ∼2% every 1000 m altitude increase, whereas it is 4% and 10% in HF patients with normal or slightly diminished exercise capacity and in HF patients with markedly diminished exercise capacity. On-field experience with HF patients at altitude is limited to subjects driven to altitude (3454 m) for a few hours. The data showed a reduction in exercise capacity similar to that reported at simulated altitude. "Optimal" HF treatment in patients spending time at altitude is likely different from optimal treatment at sea level, particularly as regards β-blockers. Carvedilol, a β1-β2-α-blocker, reduces the hypoxic ventilatory response through a reduction of the chemoreflex response, and it reduces alveolar-capillary gas diffusion, which is under control by β2-receptors. These actions are not shared by selective β1-blockers such as bisoprolol and nebivolol, which should be preferred for treatment of HF patients willing to spend time at altitude. In conclusion, spending time at altitude (<3500 m) is safe for HF patients, provided that subjects are free of co-morbidities that may directly interfere with the adaptation to altitude. However, HF patients experience a reduction of exercise capacity in proportion to HF severity and altitude. Finally, HF patients should undergo a specific "altitude-tailored treatment" to avoid pharmacological interference with altitude adaptation mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795728     DOI: 10.1089/ham.2012.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Alt Med Biol        ISSN: 1527-0297            Impact factor:   1.981


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Implications for Exercise at Altitude Among Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Aaron L Baggish; Yadav Kumar Deo Bhatta; Maria Joan Brosnan; Christoph Dehnert; J Sawalla Guseh; Debra Hammer; Benjamin D Levine; Gianfranco Parati; Eugene E Wolfel
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 2.  Clinical recommendations for high altitude exposure of individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions: A joint statement by the European Society of Cardiology, the Council on Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Society of Hypertension, the International Society of Mountain Medicine, the Italian Society of Hypertension and the Italian Society of Mountain Medicine.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Buddha Basnyat; Grzegorz Bilo; Hermann Brugger; Antonio Coca; Luigi Festi; Guido Giardini; Alessandra Lironcurti; Andrew M Luks; Marco Maggiorini; Pietro A Modesti; Erik R Swenson; Bryan Williams; Peter Bärtsch; Camilla Torlasco
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Limitation of Maximal Heart Rate in Hypoxia: Mechanisms and Clinical Importance.

Authors:  Laurent Mourot
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.