Literature DB >> 2379569

An assessment of contraceptive need in the inner city.

S E Radecki1, G S Bernstein.   

Abstract

A survey of low-income areas of Los Angeles County indicates that 41 percent of nonsterile women in their childbearing years who had not made a family planning visit in three years were using some means of birth control, 21 percent were not, 25 percent were not sexually active and 13 percent were pregnant or trying to become pregnant. Given that approximately 10 percent of the respondents were using unreliable means of contraception, at least one-third of respondents were in need of effective contraception. This proportion corresponds roughly to the percentage of respondents who expressed a desire to receive family planning care from a doctor or clinic (34 percent). The percentage of women who were at risk of unwanted pregnancy but not using any method of contraception was greatest among those with incomes below poverty level and among black and Hispanic women. A comparison of survey respondents to a parallel sample of low-income women who had made a family planning visit shows that those who utilized formal family planning services were substantially more likely than those who did not to be married (40 percent vs. 32 percent) and to belong to a health maintenance organization (24 percent vs. 14 percent), whereas nonusers of formal family planning services were slightly older, on average (29.6 years vs. 28.0 years), and more likely to have other types of private health insurance (47 percent vs. 25 percent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Age Factors; Americas; California; Clinic Visits; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage; Cultural Background; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Economic Factors; Ethnic Groups; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; High Risk Women; Low Income Population; Needs; Nonacceptor Characteristics; Nonacceptors; North America; Northern America; Organization And Administration; Population; Population Characteristics; Program Acceptability; Program Activities; Program Evaluation; Programs; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; Service Statistics; Social Class; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2379569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  5 in total

1.  A racial and ethnic comparison of family formation and contraceptive practices among low-income women.

Authors:  S E Radecki
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Correlates of partner-specific condom use intentions among incarcerated women in Rhode Island.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosengard; Jennifer G Clarke; Kristen DaSilva; Megan Hebert; Jennifer Rose; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2005-03

3.  Improving birth control service utilization by offering services prerelease vs postincarceration.

Authors:  Jennifer G Clarke; Cynthia Rosengard; Jennifer S Rose; Megan R Hebert; Jeffrey Peipert; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women.

Authors:  Jennifer G Clarke; Megan R Hebert; Cynthia Rosengard; Jennifer S Rose; Kristen M DaSilva; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Motivational interviewing with computer assistance as an intervention to empower women to make contraceptive choices while incarcerated: study protocol for randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Clarke; Melanie A Gold; Rachel E Simon; Mary B Roberts; Lar Stein
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.