Literature DB >> 23795656

Impact of scheduled angiographic follow-up in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Catalin Mindrescu1, Sorin J Brener, Alejandra Guerchicoff, Martin Fahy, Helen Parise, Roxana Mehran, Gregg W Stone.   

Abstract

Routine scheduled angiographic follow-up (SAF) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a higher rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR). Its benefits are not known. SAF at 13 months after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was planned in the first 1,800 successfully stented patients enrolled in the Harmonizing Outcomes with RevascularIZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. We compared the outcomes of patients with and without SAF at 1 year (before SAF) and at 3 years (after SAF). There were 1,197 patients (66.5% of expected) with and 2,207 patients without SAF. Prior to SAF, the 1-year composite rate of death or myocardial infarction (MI) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (2.7% vs. 3.9%, respectively, P=0.06), although the rate of death was lower (0.1% vs. 2.2%, P<0.0001), nor were there differences in the 1-year rates of TVR, stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiac and cerebral events). At 3 years, death or MI rates were again similar between the groups (8.3% vs. 9.5%, P=0.22), but TVR was more common in the SAF group (17.0% vs. 8.6%, P<0.0001), due to an increase in TVR at time of SAF. In the SAF group, patients in whom TVR was performed before or after the 13-month SAF window had markedly higher 3-year rates of MI and stent thrombosis than patients in whom TVR was performed during SAF or not at all. In conclusion, SAF after primary PCI in STEMI is associated with doubling of the rate of revascularization without an improvement in death or MI, and therefore cannot be recommended.
© 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795656     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  3 in total

1.  Follow-up tests and outcomes for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis of a Japanese administrative database.

Authors:  Tomotsugu Seki; Masato Takeuchi; Ryusuke Miki; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Routine Angiographic Follow-Up After Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization: Is Seeing Believing?

Authors:  Harsh Agrawal; Mohamed Teleb; Saba Lahsaei; Luis Carbajal; Ruben Montanez; Joseph P Carrozza
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Routine Angiographic Follow-Up versus Clinical Follow-Up after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae Young Her; Seung Woon Rha; Byoung Geol Choi; Minsuk Shim; Se Yeon Choi; Jae Kyeong Byun; Hu Li; Woohyeun Kim; Jun Hyuk Kang; Jah Yeon Choi; Eun Jin Park; Sung Hun Park; Sunki Lee; Jin Oh Na; Cheol Ung Choi; Hong Euy Lim; Eung Ju Kim; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo; Dong Joo Oh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.759

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.