BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are major causes of absence from work and underperformance in the workplace. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can be effective in treating such problems and online versions offer many practical advantages. The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of a computerized CBT intervention (MoodGYM) in a workplace context. METHOD: The study was a phase III two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial whose main outcome was total score on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). Depression, anxiety, psychological functioning, costs and acceptability of the online process were also measured. Most data were collected online for 637 participants at baseline, 359 at 6 weeks marking the end of the intervention and 251 participants at 12 weeks post-baseline. RESULTS: In both experimental and control groups depression scores improved over 6 weeks but attrition was high. There was no evidence for a difference in the average treatment effect of MoodGYM on the WSAS, nor for a difference in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence that MoodGYM was superior to informational websites in terms of psychological outcomes or service use, although improvement to subthreshold levels of depression was seen in nearly half the patients in both groups.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Depression and anxiety are major causes of absence from work and underperformance in the workplace. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can be effective in treating such problems and online versions offer many practical advantages. The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of a computerized CBT intervention (MoodGYM) in a workplace context. METHOD: The study was a phase III two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial whose main outcome was total score on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). Depression, anxiety, psychological functioning, costs and acceptability of the online process were also measured. Most data were collected online for 637 participants at baseline, 359 at 6 weeks marking the end of the intervention and 251 participants at 12 weeks post-baseline. RESULTS: In both experimental and control groups depression scores improved over 6 weeks but attrition was high. There was no evidence for a difference in the average treatment effect of MoodGYM on the WSAS, nor for a difference in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence that MoodGYM was superior to informational websites in terms of psychological outcomes or service use, although improvement to subthreshold levels of depression was seen in nearly half the patients in both groups.
Authors: Sarah Pittaway; Caroline Cupitt; David Palmer; Nike Arowobusoye; Ross Milne; Sue Holttum; Robert Pezet; Hannah Patrick Journal: Ment Health Fam Med Date: 2009-09
Authors: Judith Proudfoot; Clash Ryden; Brian Everitt; David A Shapiro; David Goldberg; Anthony Mann; Andre Tylee; Isaac Marks; Jeffrey A Gray Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Lina Gega; Dina Jankovic; Pedro Saramago; David Marshall; Sarah Dawson; Sally Brabyn; Georgios F Nikolaidis; Hollie Melton; Rachel Churchill; Laura Bojke Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Justine Schneider; Pooria Sarrami Foroushani; Paul Grime; Graham Thornicroft Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Eirini Karyotaki; Orestis Efthimiou; Clara Miguel; Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl; Toshi A Furukawa; Pim Cuijpers; Heleen Riper; Vikram Patel; Adriana Mira; Alan W Gemmil; Albert S Yeung; Alfred Lange; Alishia D Williams; Andrew Mackinnon; Anna Geraedts; Annemieke van Straten; Björn Meyer; Cecilia Björkelund; Christine Knaevelsrud; Christopher G Beevers; Cristina Botella; Daniel R Strunk; David C Mohr; David D Ebert; David Kessler; Derek Richards; Elizabeth Littlewood; Erik Forsell; Fan Feng; Fang Wang; Gerhard Andersson; Heather Hadjistavropoulos; Heleen Christensen; Iony D Ezawa; Isabella Choi; Isabelle M Rosso; Jan Philipp Klein; Jason Shumake; Javier Garcia-Campayo; Jeannette Milgrom; Jessica Smith; Jesus Montero-Marin; Jill M Newby; Juana Bretón-López; Justine Schneider; Kristofer Vernmark; Lara Bücker; Lisa B Sheeber; Lisanne Warmerdam; Louise Farrer; Manuel Heinrich; Marcus J H Huibers; Marie Kivi; Martin Kraepelien; Nicholas R Forand; Nicky Pugh; Nils Lindefors; Ove Lintvedt; Pavle Zagorscak; Per Carlbring; Rachel Phillips; Robert Johansson; Ronald C Kessler; Sally Brabyn; Sarah Perini; Scott L Rauch; Simon Gilbody; Steffen Moritz; Thomas Berger; Victor Pop; Viktor Kaldo; Viola Spek; Yvonne Forsell Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Anna S Geraedts; Annet M Kleiboer; Jos Twisk; Noortje M Wiezer; Willem van Mechelen; Pim Cuijpers Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 5.428