Leanne Groban1, Hao Wang, Frederico S M Machado, Aaron J Trask, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Carlos M Ferrario, Debra I Diz. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA ; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA ; Hypertension and Vascular Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Long-term systemic blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either an angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 receptor antagonist or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor attenuates age-related cardiac remodeling and oxidative damage, and improves myocardial relaxation. However, the role of the brain RAS in mediating the development of diastolic dysfunction during aging is not known. We hypothesized that low brain RAS protects against the development of age-related diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular remodeling. METHODS: Sixty-week-old transgenic male ASrAOGEN rats (n =9), with normal circulating Ang II and functionally low brain Ang II, because of a GFAP promoter-linked angiotensinogen antisense targeted to glia, and age-matched and sex-matched Hannover Sprague-Dawley (SD; n= 9) rats, with normal levels of both circulating and brain Ang II, underwent echocardiograms to evaluate cardiac structure and function. Postmortem hearts were further compared for histological, molecular, and biochemical changes consistent with cardiac aging. RESULTS: ASrAOGEN rats showed preserved systolic and diastolic function at mid-life and this was associated with a lower, more favorable ratio of the phospholamban-SERCA2 ratio, reduced incidence of histological changes in the left ventricle, and increased cardiac Ang-(1-7) when compared with the in-vivo functional, and ex-vivo structural and biochemical indices from age-matched SD rats. Moreover, ASrAOGEN rats had lower percent body fat and a superior exercise tolerance when compared with SD rats of the same age. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the central RAS plays a role in the maintenance of diastolic function and exercise tolerance in mid-life and this may be related to effects on body habitus.
OBJECTIVES: Long-term systemic blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either an angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 receptor antagonist or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor attenuates age-related cardiac remodeling and oxidative damage, and improves myocardial relaxation. However, the role of the brain RAS in mediating the development of diastolic dysfunction during aging is not known. We hypothesized that low brain RAS protects against the development of age-related diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular remodeling. METHODS: Sixty-week-old transgenic male ASrAOGENrats (n =9), with normal circulating Ang II and functionally low brain Ang II, because of a GFAP promoter-linked angiotensinogen antisense targeted to glia, and age-matched and sex-matched Hannover Sprague-Dawley (SD; n= 9) rats, with normal levels of both circulating and brain Ang II, underwent echocardiograms to evaluate cardiac structure and function. Postmortem hearts were further compared for histological, molecular, and biochemical changes consistent with cardiac aging. RESULTS:ASrAOGENrats showed preserved systolic and diastolic function at mid-life and this was associated with a lower, more favorable ratio of the phospholamban-SERCA2 ratio, reduced incidence of histological changes in the left ventricle, and increased cardiac Ang-(1-7) when compared with the in-vivo functional, and ex-vivo structural and biochemical indices from age-matched SDrats. Moreover, ASrAOGENrats had lower percent body fat and a superior exercise tolerance when compared with SDrats of the same age. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the central RAS plays a role in the maintenance of diastolic function and exercise tolerance in mid-life and this may be related to effects on body habitus.
Authors: C Heymes; J S Silvestre; C Llorens-Cortes; B Chevalier; F Marotte; B I Levy; B Swynghedauw; J L Samuel Journal: Endocrinology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: M Schinke; O Baltatu; M Böhm; J Peters; W Rascher; G Bricca; A Lippoldt; D Ganten; M Bader Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter Gohlke; Sebastian Von Kügelgen; Thomas Jürgensen; Thomas Kox; Wolfgang Rascher; Juraj Culman; Thomas Unger Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Annemarieke E Loot; Anton J M Roks; Robert H Henning; René A Tio; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Frans Boomsma; Wiek H van Gilst Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-04-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wilfried Dinh; Mark Lankisch; Werner Nickl; Milvia Gies; Daniel Scheyer; Frank Kramer; Thomas Scheffold; Thomas Krahns; Armin Sause; Reiner Füth Journal: Acta Cardiol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: M A Alpert; C R Lambert; B E Terry; M V Cohen; V Mukerji; C V Massey; M W Hashimi; H Panayiotou Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Zhuo Zhao; Hao Wang; Jewell A Jessup; Sarah H Lindsey; Mark C Chappell; Leanne Groban Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Steven J Forrester; George W Booz; Curt D Sigmund; Thomas M Coffman; Tatsuo Kawai; Victor Rizzo; Rosario Scalia; Satoru Eguchi Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Martina Winkler; Johanna Schuchard; Ines Stölting; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen; Christoph Thorns; Michael Bader; Walter Raasch Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2016-03-27 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Jeffrey P Coble; Justin L Grobe; Alan Kim Johnson; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Allan K Alencar; Jaqueline S da Silva; Marina Lin; Ananssa M Silva; Xuming Sun; Carlos M Ferrario; Cheping Cheng; Roberto T Sudo; Gisele Zapata-Sudo; Hao Wang; Leanne Groban Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 6.053