OBJECTIVE: A brief speech expression protocol that can be administered and scored without special training would aid in the differential diagnosis of the 3 principal forms of primary progressive aphasia (PPA): nonfluent/agrammatic PPA, logopenic variant PPA, and semantic variant PPA. METHODS: We used a picture-description task to elicit a short speech sample, and we evaluated impairments in speech-sound production, speech rate, lexical retrieval, and grammaticality. We compared the results with those obtained by a longer, previously validated protocol and further validated performance with multimodal imaging to assess the neuroanatomical basis of the deficits. RESULTS: We found different patterns of impaired grammar in each PPA variant, and additional language production features were impaired in each: nonfluent/agrammatic PPA was characterized by speech-sound errors; logopenic variant PPA by dysfluencies (false starts and hesitations); and semantic variant PPA by poor retrieval of nouns. Strong correlations were found between this brief speech sample and a lengthier narrative speech sample. A composite measure of grammaticality and other measures of speech production were correlated with distinct regions of gray matter atrophy and reduced white matter fractional anisotropy in each PPA variant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that large-scale networks are required for fluent, grammatical expression; that these networks can be selectively disrupted in PPA syndromes; and that quantitative analysis of a brief speech sample can reveal the corresponding distinct speech characteristics.
OBJECTIVE: A brief speech expression protocol that can be administered and scored without special training would aid in the differential diagnosis of the 3 principal forms of primary progressive aphasia (PPA): nonfluent/agrammatic PPA, logopenic variant PPA, and semantic variant PPA. METHODS: We used a picture-description task to elicit a short speech sample, and we evaluated impairments in speech-sound production, speech rate, lexical retrieval, and grammaticality. We compared the results with those obtained by a longer, previously validated protocol and further validated performance with multimodal imaging to assess the neuroanatomical basis of the deficits. RESULTS: We found different patterns of impaired grammar in each PPA variant, and additional language production features were impaired in each: nonfluent/agrammatic PPA was characterized by speech-sound errors; logopenic variant PPA by dysfluencies (false starts and hesitations); and semantic variant PPA by poor retrieval of nouns. Strong correlations were found between this brief speech sample and a lengthier narrative speech sample. A composite measure of grammaticality and other measures of speech production were correlated with distinct regions of gray matter atrophy and reduced white matter fractional anisotropy in each PPA variant. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that large-scale networks are required for fluent, grammatical expression; that these networks can be selectively disrupted in PPA syndromes; and that quantitative analysis of a brief speech sample can reveal the corresponding distinct speech characteristics.
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Arno Klein; Satrajit S Ghosh; Brian Avants; B T T Yeo; Bruce Fischl; Babak Ardekani; James C Gee; J J Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Felix Geser; Maria Martinez-Lage; John Robinson; Kunihiro Uryu; Manuela Neumann; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Sharon X Xie; Linda K Kwong; Lauren Elman; Leo McCluskey; Chris M Clark; Joe Malunda; Bruce L Miller; Earl A Zimmerman; Jiang Qian; Vivianna Van Deerlin; Murray Grossman; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-02
Authors: Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Nina F Dronkers; Katherine P Rankin; Jennifer M Ogar; La Phengrasamy; Howard J Rosen; Julene K Johnson; Michael W Weiner; Bruce L Miller Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: M Grossman; J Mickanin; K Onishi; E Hughes; M D'Esposito; X S Ding; A Alavi; M Reivich Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 1996 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Rene L Utianski; Hugo Botha; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Peter R Martin; Alissa M Butts; Mary M Machulda; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Alissa M Butts; Mary M Machulda; Joseph R Duffy; Edythe A Strand; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Sarah Grace Hudspeth Dalton; Christine Shultz; Maya L Henry; Argye E Hillis; Jessica D Richardson Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.408